Slams won by age

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Agassifan, Oct 28, 2009.

  1. Agassifan

    Agassifan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,562
    Age Fed Borg Pete Nadal
    18 = 00 = 01 = 00 = 00
    19 = 00 = 02 = 01 = 01
    20 = 00 = 03 = 01 = 02
    21 = 00 = 04 = 01 = 03
    22 = 01 = 06 = 03 = 05
    23 = 04 = 08 = 05 = 06
    24 = 06 = 10 = 07 = ??
    25 = 09 = 11 = 08 = ??
    26 = 12 = 11 = 10 = ??
    27 = 13 = 11 = 11 = ??
    28 = 15 = 11 = 12 = ??
    29 = ?? = 11 = 13 = ??
    30 = ?? = 11 = 13 = ??
    31 = ?? = 11 = 14 = ??

    NOTE: AGE = YEARS COMPLETED. 21 yrs 3 months = 22nd year
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2009
    #1
  2. Nice work!
    Nadals column is gonna stay on 6 whereas Feds will climb up to 17 or 18 :twisted:
     
    #2
  3. OddJack

    OddJack Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    9,672
    Location:
    South
    NICE stat buddy,

    I would not add them up though, as the age increased.
     
    #3
  4. msc886

    msc886 Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    961
    I think Nadal will slow down though as he typically wins 1 slam a year, where Fed had 3 years when he won 3 a year.
     
    #4
  5. Yes, thats a good prediction, Feds peak-years gave him more slams than Nadals peak-year did
     
    #5
  6. aleexxxxx

    aleexxxxx Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    184
    Wasn't fed 21 when he won wimbeldon 03?
     
    #6
  7. HollerOne5

    HollerOne5 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    644
    Nadal can still technically have 7 slams while he is 23, just a note.
     
    #7

Share This Page