So which Grand Slam is the greatest after the two GREATEST - Wimby and FO ?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by ClubHoUno, Oct 31, 2009.

?

So which Grand Slam is the greatest after the two GREATEST - Wimby and FO ?

  1. US Open - The tennis Radio Dance show with LIVE AeroPlanes ?

    53.1%
  2. Aussie Open - The Hardcourt adventure in humid hot Auzzie Land ?

    37.5%
  3. I hate all 4 Grand Slams - The World Tour Finals is the GREATEST !

    9.4%
  1. ClubHoUno

    ClubHoUno Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,150
    Location:
    Scandinavia, Europe
    Please vote........ :twisted:
     
    #1
  2. Vermillion

    Vermillion Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,230
    Antarctica Open - Ice court
     
    #2
  3. TheFifthSet

    TheFifthSet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,301
    Well actually I'd rank USO slightly ahead of RG in terms of prestige, but I like watching both equally.
     
    #3
  4. ClubHoUno

    ClubHoUno Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,150
    Location:
    Scandinavia, Europe
    Keep the votes coming, I've started to really enjoy the loudness of the US open, a thing I hated 10 years ago.

    It's good fun to listen to big volume pop music during the breaks and you see a lot of other tournaments around the world trying to copy the US open atmosphere these days.

    Aussi open is also a great event and I love to see the green court flooded in the sunlight, while I sit at home in the middle of the winter longing for outdoor tennis - 3-4 months away :D
     
    #4
  5. soyizgood

    soyizgood G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,323
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    USO > FO.

    USO has only been won by folks that attained #1 (except for Orantes that made #2 and currently Del Potro at #5). FO (Gomez, Costa) and Wimbledon (Krajicek) both have their share of scrubs winning in the Open Era.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2009
    #5
  6. Agassifan

    Agassifan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,508
    USO > FO. Fact
     
    #6
  7. Agassifan

    Agassifan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,508
    #7
  8. bladepdb

    bladepdb Professional

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    870
    The FO-Wimby circuit winners are considered to have accomplished one of the toughest feats of any sport due to the opposite nature of the two slams. Therefore, the prestige associated with these two cannot be questioned.

    I rank AO third as "GREATEST." I think prestige-wise, USO is a correct choice. However, AO winners have to face the brutal day heat in Melbourne to progress through to the finals. Plus, the matches going on late into the night always create buzz. USO hasn't seen as many of those as AO.
     
    #8
  9. Baikalic

    Baikalic Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Messages:
    748
    How is it a fact?
     
    #9
  10. bladepdb

    bladepdb Professional

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Messages:
    870
    He's probably an American biased that all things American are great. USO draws bigger crowds, livelier atmosphere, etc. Can't look at the big picture probably.
     
    #10
  11. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    USO > FO. I'm not an American.
     
    #11
  12. BlakeGOAT

    BlakeGOAT Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    197
    US Open is definitely the lamest slam of all four.
     
    #12
  13. Anaconda

    Anaconda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,876
    US > FO

    im not american also.
     
    #13
  14. timnz

    timnz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,450
    Roland Garros number 3 after Wimbledon and US Open

    That's my opinion (again, I am not American either). HOWEVER, I do acknowledge that some Europeans may rate the French Open over the US Open because most of tennis on the continent is played on Clay - and the French Open is the biggest clay court tournament.

    Historically though the US Open has been regarded as second only to Wimbledon.
     
    #14
  15. Slaz

    Slaz Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    269
    You guys are always saying the same thing : Historically blablabla ...

    It's not about what WAS better, but what IS better.

    I think that (as of now) RG > US. Even the AO is (now) better than the US.

    Can't stand the noise, the music, the planes and the "super" saturday which basically screw the semi-finalist who plays the second semi-final.
     
    #15
  16. Polvorin

    Polvorin Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    817
    This logical fallacy is known as the complex question. Commonly known as a loaded question. The mechanics are simple. Just assume something is true even if it is disputable or false, and then base your question off of this presupposition. Here are some examples for you:

    "ClubHoUno, have you stopped trolling?"
    "ClubHoUno, do your friends know that you are a troll?"

    You get the idea.
     
    #16
  17. fed_rulz

    fed_rulz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,614
    That's a lame argument. I could turn it around and say that many #1's have never won the FO (Pete, McEnroe, Connors, Edberg, until recently Fed...). So perhaps that's the toughest tournament to win for #1's, which makes it unique, and more prestigious?

    To me, FO > USO because:

    - it's the only clay court slam of the year, while there are two hard court slams, which IMO dilutes the uniqueness of the USO

    - USO is heavily driven by commercial (TV/rating) interests, that sometimes it appears that tennis takes a back seat (case in point: super-saturday, CBS' embarrassing championship ceremony with JMDP, men's championship match start-time,....)

    now, revenue-wise, the USO may be the biggest, but that's a different story altogether

    To the OP: USO
     
    #17
  18. dropshot winner

    dropshot winner Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,852
    AO > Wimbledon, because I like Kangaroos.
     
    #18
  19. Anaconda

    Anaconda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,876
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
     
    #19
  20. fed_rulz

    fed_rulz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,614
    I agree... uhmmm... tasty meat :twisted:
     
    #20
  21. Q&M son

    Q&M son Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    925
    Location:
    Trenque Lauquen, BA, Argentina.
    Same thought on the topic.
     
    #21
  22. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,105
    Location:
    Toronto
    Yes and definetly good for the knees for Rafa.
     
    #22
  23. Baikalic

    Baikalic Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Messages:
    748
    That's too bad that we can't have a discussion instead of people claiming intangible measures of greatness and prestige as fact. Goes for the OP as well...although I think he was just making fun of the other Grand Slam ranking thread.
     
    #23
  24. Carsomyr

    Carsomyr Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,180
    Location:
    Winesburg, Ohio
    True about the FO-Wimby double, it is one of the most impressive feats in the sport of tennis. However, I think the whole is greater than the sum of its parts; while it's almost universally accepted that Wimbledon is the most prestigious, I think the USO is generally considered second.
     
    #24
  25. soyizgood

    soyizgood G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,323
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    I can also argue FO champions often tended to be non-existent at the other slams. Muster was a beast on clay, won a FO, but never got past the 1st round at Wimbledon and only won 3 non-clay titles for his career (iirc he won 43 titles overall). Kuerten never made it past the QF at any of the other slams. Gomez was pretty much a journeyman until he won the French somehow. Gaudio? Costa? Bruguera? FO has been arguably affirmative action for grinders and was the true mark of being one-dimensional. Lendl, Borg, Wilander, Nadal, Federer are pretty much exceptions to the rule. Nadal is lucky the slam surfaces are slower and bouncier now than they were in the '90s.
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2009
    #25
  26. big bang

    big bang Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,885
    Location:
    behind your curtain
    yep, that and aussie-girls in hotpants:)
     
    #26
  27. big bang

    big bang Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,885
    Location:
    behind your curtain
    and so what? FO is the only slam where the surface doesnt favour the big servers and power players. you always see the best matches at FO and it doesnt matter if its world #1 against #100, theres no easy matches at FO.
    its the toughest one to win, you see longer and better rallies than any other slam. FO should be above wimby followed by AO with the big tv-stunt popkoncert at flushing as #4..
     
    #27
  28. boredone3456

    boredone3456 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,934
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    If we are talking currently depending on your taste you could argue the US Open being behind the Australian but if you want to talk overall prestige historically putting the US Open behind the Australian is, sorry if this offends anyone, laughable. In terms of the open era I would rank the slams as

    Wimby
    US Open
    FO
    Australian

    Both Wimby and the US Open have pretty much always been big and never went through periods where they were diminished. The FO was cast aside for a time for WTT and the Australian was not considered important globally by most until the 1980's.

    As for what is the most difficult to win, to even try to argue that in any kind of universal way is practically impossible. For Power players its the French, for players with more spin and slice it could be the US Open (case in point Nadal). You can say well the French requires a different style so its harder, well for players raised on clay the US Open is maybe just as tough to win and in the 90's and earlier Wimbledon was probably extremely difficult for some of them as the grass was so much faster. Some players exceed on faster surfaces and some on slower ones so to try and make this decision by saying such and such is harder to win is purely speculation and is completely dependent on a players game and the relative competition at the slam during the time in question. The French cuts back on power shots, in Australia you have to deal with ungodly at times heat, at Wimbledon you get the possibility of mother nature going insane, getting your match delayed multiple times, and having to deal with all those implications, and at the US Open your near the end of a long hard year, have likely already played 3 slams and a but load of tournaments otherwise and you have the mental exhaustion and physical stress factor as a result of all that. Universally there is not a formula to say slam X is harder to win than Slam Y, its all relative.
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2009
    #28
  29. i love t3nn1s

    i love t3nn1s Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    194
    you guys are dumb. Wimbledon should be considered the LEAST prestigious. Wimbledon sucks. Australian open is the best, then US Open, and then French, and then the Tourny in Indian Wells.


    Wimbledon should not be considered Major. Replace that crap with Indian Wells.
     
    #29
  30. TheSubdude

    TheSubdude Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    132
    Location:
    Court 7
    Haven't the flight patterns of planes in NY been diverted during the USO for several years now?
     
    #30
  31. Gustavo Kuerten

    Gustavo Kuerten Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2009
    Messages:
    288
    Real men play on clay.
     
    #31
  32. Telepatic

    Telepatic Legend

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Messages:
    7,167
    Location:
    Serbia, Belgrade
    AO>USO>FO imo
    Wimbledon is greatest but I like AO more.
     
    #32
  33. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    French Open is third on the list.

    Wimbledon
    US Open
    French
    Aus Open
     
    #33
  34. THUNDERVOLLEY

    THUNDERVOLLEY G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    10,301
    My list reads as follows"

    Wimbledon
    US Open






















    FO
    AUS.
     
    #34
  35. stapler

    stapler Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    846
    My list is as follows:

    All 4 GS

    Why? Because I'm someone who can simply enjoy great tennis when it is shown, and the 4 2-week spans that each of these tournaments bring are the few times each year tennis is broadcast where I live. I don't have a preference for surface; I'll take what I can get. If I had to pick one, I guess I would have to say I have most enjoyed watching the AO because it is the only slam in an otherwise 7ish month dry spell for watching tennis, and because it has had the most unique winners in recent years (4 different winners in the past 5 tournaments, as opposed to the 2 different winners for FO, 2 different for Wimby, and 2 different for US Open.)
     
    #35
  36. THUNDERVOLLEY

    THUNDERVOLLEY G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    10,301
    All the slams are important--far above all else in the sport, however, some slams have more going for them than others.
     
    #36
  37. Lionheart392

    Lionheart392 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,336
    Location:
    England
    I think now all 4 slams are equally important, I don't think players seem to care more or less about any in particular as they all fight as hard as they can at all of them. Having said that, they're definitely not all the same in terms of prestige. So does it make a difference in today's game? Probably not.
     
    #37
  38. timnz

    timnz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,450
    Wimbledon

    Nadal certainly thought that Wimbledon has higher prestige than Roland Garros, even though he is the clay Master.
     
    #38
  39. Falloutjr

    Falloutjr Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,248
    Location:
    Akron, OH
    Option D: Cincinnati. It's what all true warriors strive for.
     
    #39
  40. Netspirit

    Netspirit Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,228
    Location:
    Snoqualmie, WA
    There should be 3 GS.

    FO on clay, Wimbledon on faster grass, and USO on slower hard. There is no need for tennis to be hardcourt-biased, having twice as many GS on that surface.

    The world championship should consist of top 4 playing on all the 3 surfaces.

    That would be the ultimate coolness. It will never happen, of course.
     
    #40
  41. Tomaz Bellucci

    Tomaz Bellucci Rookie

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    115
    Location:
    Sao Paulo, Brasil
    Uso >>>> Fo !!!!!!!!!!!
     
    #41
  42. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,299
    So which Grand Slam is the greatest after the two GREATEST - Wimby and FO ?

    Well, of course, it would have to be the Australian Open because that's the only other Grand Slam left.











    (The US Open, of course comes BEFORE Wimbledon and the French Open. ;) )
     
    #42
  43. Anaconda

    Anaconda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    3,876
    The only reason people are saying the US open is the worst slam is because JMDP beat Federer. If Federer would have won 6 in a row everyone would be marvelling how Federer won the 2nd best slam 6 times in a row.
     
    #43
  44. CMM

    CMM Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,713
    Australian Open.
    US Open has rain delays, noisy audience, a stadium that is too big for tennis and Super Saturday, so it's the worst.
     
    #44
  45. Badger

    Badger Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    450
    Location:
    Corcaigh, √Čire
    I think the point of this thread was to move away from the argument between French and U.S. Opens that is currently going on in a few other threads.

    Anyway, in terms of prestige, importance and value of winning I'd have to say the U.S. but from a spectators point of view I much prefer the Australian Open. Mainly for atmosphere.
     
    #45
  46. Cantankersore

    Cantankersore Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    513
    I'm going to have to go with Cincinnati.
     
    #46
  47. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,610
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Let's mention what specific criterion we are using when defining greatness. If you rank Wimbledon at #1 and the French at #2, I think in terms of prestige/notoriety/career impact, I think the US Open is #3, with the Australian Open at #4. In terms of watchability, due to conditions, etc., I think the Australian now has an edge, but there is something to be said for the largest tennis venue, and having a grand slam in the arguably the most famous city in the world, New York. If you asked the players what major they want the most now, I think it would be Wimbledon #1, the US Open #2, the French Open #3 (barely), and the Australian Open #4.
     
    #47
  48. dincuss

    dincuss Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,639
    Location:
    World
    Fo>uso
    Ao>uso
    Wb>fo
    Fo>ao

    Bam
     
    #48
  49. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,610
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    #49
  50. Mun

    Mun Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    664
    Australian Open is the answer!
     
    #50

Share This Page