Soderling

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Wilander Fan, Jan 12, 2011.

  1. Wilander Fan

    Wilander Fan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,548
    If I had to pick the next guy to occupy a top 2 ranking, it would be Soderling. Hes pretty good on all surfaces and has improved his game on fast surfaces (Paris Indoor). His first serve and forehand are huge weapons and his return is very underrated.

    Probably wont win the AO but he is my dark horse for RG. Knocking on the door 2 years in a row means he knows how to win there.
     
    #1
  2. dandelion_smiley

    dandelion_smiley Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    974
    True, Soderling is a way bigger threat than Murray or Djokovic. As long as Federer and Nadal are top 2 and playing well, I don't see it coming soon, tho.
     
    #2
  3. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,165
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Nadal, Federer, Djokovic and Murray all have better and more complete games. Soderling will stay around number five or lower the remainder of his career.

    Murray will once again supplant Soderling at number 4, soon.
     
    #3
  4. dandelion_smiley

    dandelion_smiley Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    974
    Bro, Murray is defending 1200 points at the Australian Open. Soderling, what, 10? Murray is going to have to win the whole thing if he is to climb back to no 4 after the tournament.
     
    #4
  5. Wilander Fan

    Wilander Fan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,548
    Its all part of Murray's strategy which he has been hatching since 2009. He is apparently some kind of misunderstood tennis genius.
     
    #5
  6. John_Doe

    John_Doe Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    171
    I think Soderling does not currently have a top 2 game and his game is probably somewhat inferior to Djokovic and Murray. However, whenever I see Soderling play his best, it appears as if his potential may be higher than the other two, and lets face it, the way things are right now it doesn't look like anybody will be unthroning either Federer or Nadal with their current level of play. But Soderling looks like he has what it takes to take his game to the next level. Also, this may be quite some time away, but I think Del Potro sure has what it takes as well, but he has this injury to recover first before we can start talking about it.
     
    #6
  7. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,165
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Doesn't matter. Murray is a better player with more natural talent. he will definitely end up ahead of Soderling once again. Didn't anyone ever teach you that cream rises to the top? Soderling isn't cream :)

    Agree. On any day, Soderling playing at his best has a shot against anybody. But a huge part of staying in the top 5 is consistency.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2011
    #7
  8. Wilander Fan

    Wilander Fan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,548
    But he has been rising consistently. I was sold when he won the Paris Indoor beating Llodra and Monfils, both red hot, in their own backyard. That was a really impressive win...and a 1000 event as well.
     
    #8
  9. Carolina Racquet

    Carolina Racquet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,505
     
    #9
  10. dandelion_smiley

    dandelion_smiley Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    974
    I'm starting to consider Soderling a bigger threat in Slams than Murray. At least he's CONSISTANTLY making quarters only to lose to either Federer or Nadal (beat both already). Aren't Slams considered "cream"?

    Murray on the other hand can show up to play, reach a final and then lose in the 3rd round of the next 3. If Slams were to decide who's where in the rankings, it would be Soderling>Murray
     
    #10
  11. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    I would bet against soderling making the final at RG this year. I would go with a QF or SF loss.
     
    #11
  12. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,959
    Location:
    New York
    Apart from RG, Sod hasn't shown much in slams. Went out meekly to Rafa at W and to Fed at USO.
    Murray is a 2 time finalist on hard court: a little bit of respect wouldn't hurt (including AO 2010: imo he's a major contender this year as well).
     
    #12
  13. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,571
    And a two time semi-finalist on grass. Remind me how Sod did against Murray at the WTF? Robin's doing well - just won his first MS. Murray has won 6 times that many of course - despite Robin being 3 years older.
     
    #13
  14. athiker

    athiker Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    1,656
    Movement seemed to be holding Soderling back and to me he recently looks just a touch trimmer and seemed to be moving better around the court. It will be tough to reach top 2, but I suppose anything could happen...

    #3 is well within reach. He trails Djokovic by less than 500 pts. In Australia 2010 Djokovic made it to the Quarterfinals and Soderling lost in the 1st round. Djokovic is defending 360 points and Soderling 10.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2011
    #14
  15. IvanAndreevich

    IvanAndreevich Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,493
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Soderling has a better forehand, second serve, and first serve than Murray. If he can keep it together mentally he's a better player than Murray. Murray has had the better career, but at this moment Sod is playing better tennis (as evident by the ranking).
     
    #15
  16. Bryan Swartz

    Bryan Swartz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,751
    2010 performance in Slams:

    AO: Soderling R128(l. Granollers), Murray F(l. Federer)
    FO: Soderling F(l. Nadal), Murray R16(l. Berdych)
    WM: Soderling Q(l. Nadal), Murray S(l. Nadal)
    USO: Soderling Q(l. Federer), Murray R32(l. Wawrinka)

    Points from Slams, 2010 --

    Soderling: 1,930
    Murray: 2,145

    Hrm, guess that didn't work for 2010 -- which btw was, by far, Soderling's best year in terms of Slam performance.
     
    #16
  17. dandelion_smiley

    dandelion_smiley Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    974
    That's one way to look at it. Soderling showed up to play at the French Open, Wimbledon and the US Open, Murray was a factor in Australia and at Wimbledon.

    Same goes for 2009 - Murray underperformed in Australia and the US Open, played decent at the French Open and well at Wimbledon,
    Soderling lost in 2009 to Federer 3 times, at the French Open, Wimbledon and the US Open.

    Count the points from 2009 together with 2010 and see who's got more - Murray or Soderling.
     
    #17
  18. Bryan Swartz

    Bryan Swartz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,751
    First of all, adding 2009 does not address your point, which was that Soderling would be ranked ahead of Murray if you counted only Slams. He would not.

    If you add 2009 and 2010 together, you get this:

    Soderling: 3,715
    Murray: 3,585

    Soderling ahead by a hair. Again it's a mixed bag(as you might expect with two players so close in the rankings) -- Soderling's was more consistent at the last three Slams both years -- his AO was also worse both years than any Murray Slam over the period.

    So again, I see nothing to justify the point that Soderling > Murray in Slams.
     
    #18
  19. Lsmkenpo

    Lsmkenpo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,915

    Remind me how Murray did against Soderling the two previous meetings to the WTF?

    What was it again, maybe two straight set losses while being breadsticked a set in both matches. But lets not mention this, I hate to hijack a good Murray thread.
     
    #19
  20. dandelion_smiley

    dandelion_smiley Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    974
    My point is Soderling is MORE consistant than Murray in Slams, he is less prone to being knocked out by a lesser player, Murray has gone out early in his last 2 US Opens, in his forelast Australian Open and is not a threat to anyone at the French Open, even at 2009 Wimbledon he lost to Andy Roddick (doesn't matter Roddick was in great shape, turns out now it was an anomaly)
     
    #20
  21. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,571
    You would have beaten Murray at that point last year - he was still in his post AO 'pumped by Roger in slam final again' mega-slump. At the WTF on the other hand, Sod was on a high - new world number 4, first time MS winner - and yet Murray gubbed him.
     
    #21
  22. Bryan Swartz

    Bryan Swartz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,751
    This is only true if you ignore the AO. Soderlings last two he lost to Grannolers(113th) and Baghdatis(97th). In the last three years, Murray has only lost twice to players not ranked in the Top 20 at a Slam. Those guys are Wawrinka at the most recent USO(27th) and Tsonga at the 2008 Australian(38th).

    The last time Murray had a Slam loss even arguably as bad as the Grannollers one was when he was a teenager(vs. Clement at the 2005 USO).
     
    #22
  23. Lsmkenpo

    Lsmkenpo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,915
    Yes, the WTF should be the real measure, a court that plays like no other on tour, slow and low bouncing, perfect for a player like Soderling to play his attacking game against Murray the defensive player, huh?
     
    #23
  24. dandelion_smiley

    dandelion_smiley Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    974
    now we can argue whos considered a "lesser player", ok I ment top 10, you don't see Soderling losing to guys in Slams outside of the top 10 (except Australia), Murray indeed
     
    #24
  25. Sid_Vicious

    Sid_Vicious G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,683
    Location:
    In The City
    Soderling is a dumb ball basher.
     
    #25
  26. OrangePower

    OrangePower Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,054
    Location:
    NorCal Bay Area
    Sod will not occupy at top 2 ranking, simply because he is too old. By the time Rafa and Fed relinquish their deathgrip on 1 and 2, Sod will be past his prime.
     
    #26
  27. Lsmkenpo

    Lsmkenpo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,915
    What a disgrace for Soderling to lose to 97th ranked Marcos Baghdatis the man with a winning H2H record over Andy Murray and also the same man who knocked Murray out of Wimbledon a few years ago, Robin should feel ashamed.
     
    #27
  28. Bryan Swartz

    Bryan Swartz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,751
    Nah, I think we've safely beaten it to death. Depends on how you measure it. I don't think it makes sense to make a general point about Slams that fails when you exclude on of them.
     
    #28
  29. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,581
    Oh God, I hope not! He has the personality of a dead rat! Please, keep Nadal and Federer as 1 and 2 for at least a while so I can enjoy the game!
     
    #29
  30. cc0509

    cc0509 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    14,581
    Thank goodness! Let's hope and pray Nadal and Federer don't get injured or sick!
     
    #30
  31. KHSOLO

    KHSOLO Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2009
    Messages:
    672
    Delpo uninjured would be in the 2 spot over all those
     
    #31
  32. FedError

    FedError Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Messages:
    701
    Location:
    A park in Melbourne
    If I had to pick the next guy to occupy a top 2 ranking, it would be Donald Young.
     
    #32
  33. kishnabe

    kishnabe G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    17,111
    Location:
    Toronto
    Soderling would be top 2 but number 3 is defintly possibly and most likely if he win the Aussie!
     
    #33

Share This Page