Something a little lighter thana 6.1 BLX 95?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by heninfan99, Jan 30, 2012.

  1. heninfan99

    heninfan99 Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,512
    Love my 6.1 BLX 95 but it's just a little too heavy. Anyone had the same problem? At what swing weight does plow through begin to happen?

    I'm demoing the Prestige mid & MP and also want to try the Prince Diablo 93.
    I need plow through but I also need to be able to whip the racquet around a bit.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks.
     
    #1
  2. cltennis21

    cltennis21 New User

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Try the new Wilson prostaff blx 6.1 95 a lot lighter and swings lighter so you can also add a good amount of lead tape too it of desired.
     
    #2
  3. heninfan99

    heninfan99 Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,512
    I'll try it out. I hit with this for like 5 minutes. It felt way too light but not enough time with it. Will try again and imagine lead. Thanks.

     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2012
    #3
  4. trilix

    trilix Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    129
    Location:
    Belgium
    If applicable you could try the following tips:

    - Remove grip and overgrip and only use a few light overgrips (example wilson pro overgrip, vs babolat). Make sure to put them on tight and cut off remains.
    - Remove the damper = saves 2g


    I removed a synthetic grip of my PS 85 and used 4 overgrips, and this was still much lighter. (p.s. First I tried 2 overgrips, but this was too small for me, when playing 2 matches on one day).

    grtz
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2012
    #4
  5. Power Player

    Power Player G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    19,939
    Location:
    On my iPhone
    Get the Tecnifibre Tfight 320. That is the best alternative option. There are just not many sticks like the 6.1 95 to be honest. The Tfight hits with massive spin, but you will lose a little raw crushing power.
     
    #5
  6. fuzz nation

    fuzz nation Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,629
    Do you have any familiarity with the balance that your prefer in your racquets? If you need that BLX to be more maneuverable, you can add some weight to the handle so that the balance of the frame is more head-light. Since the added weight is under your hand, it shouldn't give you anywhere near the impression of swinging a heavier racquet as you'd typically experience if you put some lead up on your hoop.

    Since the balance of the racquet shifts to a more HL layout by adding handle weight, the "plow-through" remains pretty much the same because you haven't removed any heft from up on the head. If the only problem you have with your racquet is its maneuverability, this tuning option could be all that you need.

    While I respect the idea behind listing swing-weights in different racquets, that number isn't much help to me on its own. I'm usually better off knowing the static weight and balance of a racquet so that I can better predict both its stability and maneuverability. If I put those spec's together with the flex rating of the racquet, I can get a very good picture of how it will handle and perform for me. If you don't pay much attention to those numbers in your own gear, I definitely recommend that you keep track of them to help with finding your best layout.
     
    #6
  7. tlm

    tlm Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,515
    Try finding the same racket in the asian version.
     
    #7
  8. Edo

    Edo Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    109
    yeah, try the asian version (which is available regularly in europe, it's called blx 6.1 95 limited edition 309 gr.)
     
    #8
  9. heninfan99

    heninfan99 Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,512
    Interestingly the static weight of the BLX 6.1 95 is lighter than the 90 but I found the 90 easier to swing. I'm assuming the balance is similar but maybe not. Good info. Thanks!

     
    #9
  10. Fed Kennedy

    Fed Kennedy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    4,786
    Location:
    With Roger
    Get the team version and customize to your taste.
     
    #10
  11. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,922
    Try strength and conditioning instead of switching to a racket that allows you to be weak and puny.
     
    #11
  12. Xizel

    Xizel Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,404
    Be realistic. Unless I'm competing, I'd rather enjoy the hit right now and here rather than train to even be able to do that.
     
    #12
  13. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,922
    Would you like us to make the court smaller, so you don't have to run as far? Or play a pro set instead of best of three? This is sports. You have to get the heart pumping and the muscles strong. Girls can swing the 6.1 95 (Carol of TW). Older men can swing the 6.1 95 (Granville).
     
    #13
  14. bluetrain4

    bluetrain4 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    8,836
    The updated BLX 6.1 95 is more headlight and the swing weight has come down from 335ish to 324ish. It really is easier swinging and more maneuverable. I play tested it and this was my first impression. So, if you really like the 6.1s but want something that is a bit more user friendly, this could be it.

    There's no new name. It's just the BLX 6.1 95 2012. It has been released in Europe, so if you want to look at the specs, check out Tennis Warehouse - Europe website.

    It's scheduled for U.S. release in the middle or end of February, I think.
     
    #14
  15. Xizel

    Xizel Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,404
    I'm a competing junior, so it's really not an issue for me, but honestly, each one of those pose very little a problem, but when together, it is a daunting task to do all of that and swing a 12+ oz racquet (which I do, with poly) in the heat if you live in more extreme weather conditions. Settle for the 11 oz range, which is still decent compared to the true weaklings of these days who swing 9-10 oz sticks.
     
    #15
  16. UCSF2012

    UCSF2012 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,922
    Then you of all people should know the value of training. A tennis ball is best struck with a 12+ oz racket. It's also safest for your arm to hit with a heavier racket. Besides, you're not really "swinging" the racket as much as you're rotating your body/arm and blocking the ball.
     
    #16
  17. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,202
    Demo the Slazenger Pro Braided.
     
    #17
  18. ICanBeSerious

    ICanBeSerious Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    169
    Location:
    Snap City
    I agree with that. I own the old BLX 6.1 95 and i just bought the new 2012.
    Very noticeable difference in swingweight, easier swings and a tiny bit more flexibility.
     
    #18
  19. heninfan99

    heninfan99 Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,512
    Well, if the new BLX 95 (not the box beam one) is a little lighter I will demo that too. I held the Prestige MP yesterday and it felt great. Will hit with it tonight. If it has plow through it would be a winner though I prefer the Wilson grip shape.
     
    #19
  20. heninfan99

    heninfan99 Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,512
    When you get older and play many hours of doubles without hitting the weight room regularly an 11.9 stick just might be the sweet spot. I'll see tonight.

    But if you could make the court smaller that would be great too. Tanx.

     
    #20
  21. heninfan99

    heninfan99 Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,512
    I hit with the new Prestige MP tonight. It felt great but the plow through was right on the cusp, maybe a little low. I will continue to test it. I found it hard to get pace with it on serves but placement was good.. The volleys were pretty crisp. This could be a winner. I'm thinking this or the PS 90 Asian version.

    Interestingly someone had the last version of the Prestige MP and it felt noticeably heavier than the new version I'm demoing.
     
    #21
  22. Xizel

    Xizel Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,404
    The last generation had more mass in the head (TW shows the SW as 318 vs 310 for the new IG). I always thought Prestiges needed lead in the head (I prefer 340 SW, at the very least 325+), so consider a tiny amount of lead work.
     
    #22
  23. heninfan99

    heninfan99 Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,512
    Ahhh. Good info. Tanx.

     
    #23
  24. jgreen06

    jgreen06 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    125
    ^ Amen to that... Ive been trying to switch from my hps 6.1s for years and wilson keeps putting out these 6.1 battleaxes. Maybe these new 6.1s will be more like the old hps....

    As for recommendations, I would say tecnifibre 320 or 325, either new or old prince rebel, bab storm tour
     
    #24
  25. fuzz nation

    fuzz nation Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,629
    Unless you have some sort of funky Yonex allergy, you might want to get a look at their VCore 95 D (speaking of 11.9 oz. frames).

    Funny - I'm pretty big on heavier, more stable frames myself, but I also love having an alternative in my bag when I don't have all my mojo. I got back out with my doub's group last night after being laid up for a month and those "rust never sleeps" rumors apparently still hold true.

    My go-to racquets are my Volkl C10's, but after two sets of just clumsy, hot and cold playing, I swapped over to my mildly lighter Prince Hybrid Tour. It was plainly easier to get my racquet on the ball and the extra couple notches worth of stiffness were really nice for punching the ball around the court, too. Not that this proved anything, but for me it reinforced the popular advice of playing with the heaviest frame that you can use well. No shame in going leaner if that's where you find the best fit.
     
    #25
  26. Power Player

    Power Player G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    19,939
    Location:
    On my iPhone
    You have the new one already? Very interesting. This could be the goat stick if what you are saying is true.

    I did play the demo and loved it, but it has been a while so I can't A/B it to my BLX's.
     
    #26
  27. TennisCJC

    TennisCJC Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,361
    Try the new Volkl O10 line - either a stock 325 or a customized 295. They are 16x19, 20 mm thin beam, crisp like a Wilson, but no vibrations and good shaft flex like a volkl. Torsional stability is 2nd to none - look at TW stats on twist weight in TW Univerity power zone page - stock twist weight is 13.4 g - pretty high.

    I played the blx 6.1 95 16x18 for a year or so and transitioned to a customized Volkl o10 295. Customized to 12 oz, 335+SW, 5 HL and it plays as strong and stable as the wilson but it is .5 oz light - wilson blx 6.1 95 was 12.5 with vibration dampener and overgrip. I could take weight off the handle and probably get to 11.7 oz, sw 335+, 4 HL with overgrip and dampener. But, 12 oz seems quick enough for me.
     
    #27
  28. heninfan99

    heninfan99 Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,512
    Interesting. I do like Volkl, well, I liked the BB Pro when I demo'd it.
     
    #28

Share This Page