SPPP vs CYBERFLASH

Discussion in 'Strings' started by lawlitssoo1n, Feb 15, 2009.

  1. lawlitssoo1n

    lawlitssoo1n Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,470
    I want to know which play better in 16G and i do not plan on using 17G

    which one has
    MORE SPIN
    MORE CONTROL
    MORE POWER
     
    #1
  2. hoodjem

    hoodjem G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    12,770
    Location:
    Bierlandt
    I'd have to say
    MORE SPIN = Definitely Cyberflash
    MORE CONTROL = Cyberflash
    MORE POWER = toss-up
    MORE FEEL = Definitely Cyberflash
     
    #2
  3. tennisfreak15347

    tennisfreak15347 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,655
    Location:
    NJ
    although you did not ask for it, tension maintenance= SPPP. it was specifically designed for that, and maybe just that.
     
    #3
  4. lawlitssoo1n

    lawlitssoo1n Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,470
    BOTH strings have pretty high stiffness range, higher than premier ace. and when i used premier ace i had a really hard time with my elbows(but first time using poly) i strung it up at 64 lbs. and i litterally died! i currently use BG/gosen micro at 64/63, so do you think i could use cyberflash or sppp at 64 lbs full?

    oh and another questions
    what is the benefit of string the crosses higher or lower?
     
    #4
  5. tennisfreak15347

    tennisfreak15347 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,655
    Location:
    NJ
    for anything besides poly, stringing crosses usually stops string movement, but string movement isn't a factor in polys. I would say one cause for stringing crosses higher or lower would be to alter the stiffness of the stringbend without drastically altering the power of the racquet.
     
    #5
  6. In)SpiRe

    In)SpiRe Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,025
    SPIN- CF
    CONTROL- CF
    POWER- CF
    FEEL- SPPP
    TM- SPPP

    But I have not tried the 16g for either. This is based on my 17 and 17L experiences, and they were a while ago.
     
    #6
  7. radical pro joe

    radical pro joe New User

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    72
    Spin-draw
    Control-CF
    Power-CF
    Feel-SPPP
    TM-SPPP

    I used to use SPPP but switched to CF because it is so much cheaper. The main difference is that SPPP plays softer and CF is crisper.
     
    #7

Share This Page