String pattern vs. string gauge

Discussion in 'Strings' started by cyberg, Mar 12, 2008.

  1. cyberg

    cyberg New User

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2008
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    Sweden
    I have a somewhat hypothetical quiestion that I searched for on the forum but didn't find any relevant info on:

    Let's assume that we have 2 racquets that are identical except for the string pattern, e.g. Wilson K6.1 16X18 and 18X20. Many people argue that a tighter string pattern equals more control and less spin than an open string pattern. The argument for this would be that the open string pattern allows the ball to sink deeper into the pattern so to speak due to the greater distance between the srings. Also, the stringbed would be softer than on a racquet with a tight string pattern given that they both are strung with the same tension, which would also create more spin, assumeably. Here is the question: Thinner string generally create more spin than thicker strings, so how much difference in string gauge would create the same spin with a 18X20 racquet as with a 16X18?
     
    #1
  2. YULitle

    YULitle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,132
    Location:
    Guymon, OK
    The depends on more than just the pattern. You need to know the distance between the mains individually. If you add two mains to a 16X19 to make it a 18X19, but the two mains are really small and smashed up against the rim, that doesn't really open up the hitting surface now does it? That may seem extreme, but the slight changes matter too. Generally what is going to open up a hitting surface more is a change in pattern. This involves a much larger, even visible, change in distance between the mains in the hitting area. A change in gauge, for instance from 16 to 17, AT BEST changes the strings thickness from 1.33 mm to 1.20 mm (a difference of .13mm.) If you account for this change on both sides of any gap, you have .26mm, or roughly a fourth of a millimeter. This isn't even 20% of the original width of the string. So, we're talking small, almost imperceptible, differences. Where as a change in pattern is visually obvious.
     
    #2
  3. TennezSport

    TennezSport Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,885
    Location:
    Northern NJ, USA
    Yup!

    ^^^ What he said. :)

    TennezSport :cool:
     
    #3
  4. hyogen

    hyogen Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,951
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    so do thinner gauge strings lose their tension quicker?
     
    #4
  5. YULitle

    YULitle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,132
    Location:
    Guymon, OK
    relatively, yes
     
    #5
  6. topknocker

    topknocker Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    148
    hey if we're gonna' get high tech lets just go all the way. "thinner strings lose tension quicker" maybe, depends on some things. 16 gauge mutifilament may lose tension quicker than lets say a 17 gauge multicore with a double wrap. if we're gonna' talk about gauge let's make sure we include the makeup of the strings. wouldn't you think.
     
    #6
  7. YULitle

    YULitle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Messages:
    4,132
    Location:
    Guymon, OK
    That's why I said relatively ;)
     
    #7
  8. Pro_Tour_630

    Pro_Tour_630 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    5,154
    Location:
    Connecticut
    is NG better than Multi, well RELATIVELY yes:)
     
    #8

Share This Page