Tennis needs a new good rivalry

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Oscar, Mar 4, 2005.

  1. Oscar

    Oscar New User

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    65
    I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday and remembered tennis in late 70s with Borg-McEnroe rivalry or Lendl-McEnroe in 80s. I mean, I missed the big good rivalries in tennis, it is good for sport and for the game of tennis. Right now the game is a little boring with such Federer dominance. I love Federer´s game but the sport would be more interesting with some player who can give Federer a really good rivalry, maybe Safin or Nadal, i don´t know, whoever. Do you think that could be possible nowadays?
     
    #1
  2. davey25

    davey25 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,059
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Anybody that says mens tennis is too boring because Federer is too dominant probably does not like and wants him to never win, since when you think about he is not that dominant. In the last 4 years, Hewitt has ended the year #1 twice, Roddick once, and Federer once. So somebody has been year-end #1 twice as many times, and somebody over a year younger did it before he did. Furthermore he has not won the one slam played this year, somebody else has. So he, up to now, been only the best player one out of the last five years and he is so dominant it is boring. Again obviously somebody who cant stand him and finds him winning any big titles torturesome since the "too dominant" argument does not fly for him of yet.
     
    #2
  3. Oscar

    Oscar New User

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    65
    Of course i want Federer to win as much as i want a really good competition. My point is: All the sports have been great when there are great rivalries and tennis needs a really one for the upcoming years.
     
    #3
  4. davey25

    davey25 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,059
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Safin and Federer have had very close matches the last two times they played. Federer needed a 20-18 tiebreaker to end a straight set win over Safin in the year-end Masters, and Safin beat Federer in the Australian Open semis denying him winning a slam title. So they already have a rivalry even if Federer wins 2 more slams and ends the year #1 again. I know how it works though, when it is Federer he needs to lose 5 in a row to somebody for it to be a satisfactory rivalry, when it is Serena or Venus they need to be taken to an occasional 6-3 set for it to be considered a good enough rivalry to please viewers.
     
    #4
  5. WW Volley

    WW Volley Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    229
    If Safin can keep his game to a high level for years, then we can assume him and Federer will be meeting a lot in big matches.
     
    #5
  6. davey25

    davey25 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,059
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    I wouldnt mind that at all. I like both of them, I prefer Roger but I also like Marat. I was happy he won the Aussie Open after losing two finals there, it is the one he deserved to win most given his tough luck there. If they meet in finals atleast it ensures Roddick or Hewitt will be the champion which is to the satisfaction of most I am sure. :p
     
    #6
  7. Kobble

    Kobble Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,365
    Safin and Federer are a great match-up. Now, an American and Federer rivalry is another story. I know I am stating the obvious, but the best talent is not on our soil right now. As far as young guns go, I have to say Nadal and Ancic are going to carry the torch. Actually, they are already producing against the best players.
     
    #7
  8. voltman

    voltman Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    150
    How about Serena versus the ball?
     
    #8
  9. USCfan

    USCfan Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2004
    Messages:
    815
    Maybe we'll see Nadal and Monfils in a couple years... that would be interesting.
     
    #9
  10. spinbalz

    spinbalz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,676
    If Safin can keep his Australian open mindset... but given Safin's match tanking history, it is a BIG IF !!!
     
    #10
  11. Gaurav Singh

    Gaurav Singh New User

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    23
    i think Safin will cherish every match he plays against federer from now on and vice versa........its a blockbuster..........millions will be watching..........safin beat him in AO......that hurt Federer........the next time they play its gonna be big......the whole tennis world will halt to watch the 2 of the games greatest talents battling..... BOTH WILL RISE TO THE OCCASION AND U'LL SEE DA BEST OF DEM BOTH.....A RIVALRY HAS STARTED!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    #11
  12. pound cat

    pound cat G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    13,743
    Safin will have to get over his "I really only bother playing my best when I'm playing someone who's really good'' mentaility, stop being knocked out of early rounds, and make sure he gets far in every tournament and has a chance to play Federer. Now that he's got some confidence in his ability, thanks to Lundgren, if/when he gets to Federer he should be able to beat him half the time.
     
    #12
  13. aj_m2009

    aj_m2009 Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,332
    That isn't true. IMO it just gets to a point where someone is so dominant in a certain period of time that it gets boring. Look at Venus and Serena in '02. Mary Carillo was always talking about how people were getting tired of seeing them in slam finals. And it even got that way with me and I am a pretty big fan of both Venus and Serena. Now back to the topic, I think a Nadal-Coria rivalry would be cool or two serve-and-volleyers like Henman and Dent or something to that effect.
     
    #13
  14. davey25

    davey25 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,059
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Yeah but then you are talking about rivalries that obviously are not for the #1 spot. Nadal, Coria, and Henman have outside chancers at being top-5ers this year but no way is there one of those fighting for #1 this year. Dent is even beneath that is his prospects.
     
    #14
  15. aj_m2009

    aj_m2009 Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,332
    I didn't realize that the rivalries had to be for the no. 1 spot.
     
    #15
  16. davey25

    davey25 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,059
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Good than Roger doesnt need a rival for the #1. :) There just needs to be alot of good rivalries for other spots.
     
    #16
  17. Haka Boy

    Haka Boy Guest

    Is that HER balls or the ones that you bounce around using a tennis racket.
     
    #17
  18. Kaptain Karl

    Kaptain Karl Hall Of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    5,236
    Location:
    The High Country of Colorado
    Part of what makes rivalries of the past so captivating is the clash of differing styles of play. The only "style" I can see giving Roger trouble is S/V ... only nobody's near enough to the top who plays that style (yet).

    Connors thought of Borg as "another topspinner."

    Borg, the baseliner -vs- Mac the attacker.

    Sampras' power -vs- Agassi's needle-threading passes.

    Hingis' artistry -vs- Williams' power.

    ... It's the differences which add to the intrigue.

    - KK
     
    #18

Share This Page