Thanks to you guys...

Discussion in 'Strings' started by jcstennis, Oct 3, 2007.

  1. jcstennis

    jcstennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,472
    :) i bought a Gamma x-2, strung my first racquet tonight... it was awesome! I strung a Prince CTS Approach 110 with NRG2 17g. Seriously, i strung the racquet in 1 hour 25 minutes.. for the first time, not bad. No major mistakes... just a bit tricky with the first clamp, i learned the hard way. But i took my time, made sure tension was horizontal, strings were straight, etc... and weaving (push weave) is easier than i thought, and started to move quick... a little rough weaving the x's near the end... and knots were easier than i thought.

    Anyway... thanks for all that have been very helpful, informative and patient with us newbies! I will be stringing my personal racquets tomorrow... a bit nervous.;)
     
    #1
  2. shojun25

    shojun25 Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,492
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Gratz about your new stringer! By the way, did you receive like 6 packs of free strings with it?

    Multifilaments are really easy strings to string - let's see how you do with polyester ;)
     
    #2
  3. jcstennis

    jcstennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,472
    thanks!!! more than that...! i got if from another well known on-line site. The bonus pack was 12 packs of assorted Gamma string and different grips and dampeners. most of which i will never use, but hey...

    poly! i hope not! ;) i play with Pro Supex Big Ace and was going to experiment with other polys.

    what's the poly deal? ... too stiff? hard to move after tensioning? coil memory? stringing fatigue?
     
    #3
  4. shojun25

    shojun25 Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,492
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Big Ace shouldn't be too hard to string as its a soft polyester.

    Most polyester strings are not as flexible as syn gut or multifilament when you string (and when you play with it). You're just gonna start to dislike weaving because its a pain to do the push weave method. Also, make sure to adjust your clamp when your dealing with poly - just adjust it about 2 notch higher than regular.
     
    #4
  5. jcstennis

    jcstennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,472
    what weave... is less than a pain?:)

    Why tighten the clamp more with poly? it would seem that the string is stronger/stiffer and would stay true under pressure... or is it the opposite, it wants to keep strong and resists the clamps pressure?

    thanks for the insight!
     
    #5
  6. jcstennis

    jcstennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,472
    plus, i will mostly be stringing one piece... is that more difficult with poly (in general)?
     
    #6
  7. Steve Huff

    Steve Huff Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,280
    1 Piece??? Make sure you string the crosses from top to bottom. You may need to learn an Around-the-World pattern to do that 1 piece. If it's hard to clamp, you need to loosen the clamp, not tighten it. You'll crush the string if you have to force the clamp closed.
     
    #7
  8. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,741
    Why does one piece have to be strung top to bottom for the crosses? On a nCode 90, the last main puts the string at the bottom so I have no choice to string the crosses from bottom to top, right? I mean, what choice do I have?
     
    #8
  9. Pusher

    Pusher Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,282
    Location:
    South Carolina
    For me, I don't like the bottom to top cross stringing. Tying off that string at the top makes the tension a little inconsistent. I'd rather have that inconsistency at the bottom of the frame.
    Like Steve said, you can learn the ATW pattern or simply using the 2 piece method. I like the 2 piece method because you're dealing with less string and its necessary if you string hybrids.
     
    #9
  10. BurghKing

    BurghKing Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    275
    Location:
    At the Courts
    Some racquet manufacturers claim that tying off the crosses at the head puts too much strees on that part of racquet. They claim that tying off the crosses at the throat is better because there is more material to better handle the stress. I have never had a problem with my racquets, or my customers, by tying of at the head. However, I am sure some people will disagree with me and say you should not do it.
     
    #10
  11. jcstennis

    jcstennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,472
    that's what i figured, don't clamp too tight, never over-tighten!

    And yes, my string pattern is cross from top to bottom.;)

    Thanks Steve!
     
    #11
  12. Bubba

    Bubba Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,230
    Location:
    Baseline
    That is correct for the K/N 90's. Other frames differ. 18 Main patterns would *generally* result in a top to bottom pattern for the crosses due to where the mains finish. Likewise, a 14 main pattern would also provide for a top to bottom cross approach on a 1-piece pattern.

    HOWEVER - easy enough to solve. Just string as a two piece and you can start the crosses at the top on a 90... it's what I do (though I hybrid)
     
    #12
  13. samster

    samster Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,017
    Probably a non-issue unless you string your racket very tight.
     
    #13

Share This Page