The 2003 US Open semi "controversy"

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Arafel, Mar 25, 2009.

  1. Arafel

    Arafel Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,160
    So, in reading around these boards a lot, I often will see someone post about how David Nalbandian was robbed in the 2003 US Open semi by a bad call and would surely have beaten Andy Roddick in that match if not for a bad call that handed the match to Roddick. I stopped following tennis for a while when Connors retired, and didn't start playing again till 2004. The first match I saw was the 2004 Wimbledon final, and I've liked Roddick ever since.

    Point being, I hadn't seen the 2003 US Open. So, after reading all these posts about how Nalby was robbed, I decided to Google it, read a little about the supposed bad call, then watched the third set tiebreak on You Tube.

    Anybody who thinks Nalby was robbed is drinking serious Kool Aid. Admittedly, the fan screaming out may have been distracting, but frankly, they did that after the bounce and before Roddick hit it back. If that call should have affected anyone, it was Andy, but he kept playing. Nalby was the one who let it get to him.

    I used to see that happen a lot in the 80s in matches with Borg, Connors, Lendl and McEnroe at the US Open, and they knew enough to keep playing.

    Furthermore, Nalby didn't lose the tiebreak on that one point. The man was up 3-0 and 4-2 in that tiebreaker and played a couple of careless points that let Roddick get back in it. With his confidence bolstered, Roddick started firing aces and service winners. By the match point, it was clear Roddick was the aggressor and more in control. I think that is further proved because Roddick won the fourth set 6-1.

    Bottom line, Nalbandian wasn't robbed; he blew it, just like he blew the French in 2004 and has blown countless other Slam matches. The guy has talent, but he isn't a champion.
     
    #1
  2. ESP#1

    ESP#1 Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,093
    Ima big Nalby fan but the truth is he had plenty of chances to win that match, could that call have change the outcome? its possible, but regardless he was not robbed.
     
    #2
  3. FD3S

    FD3S Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,173
    This. How the hell people manage to spin this against Roddick is beyond me, b/c if anyone should have been distracted, it was him. Nalbandian really had no excuse.
     
    #3
  4. VivalaVida

    VivalaVida Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,958
    Agreed, Andy Roddick's win at the US open was 100 percent legit.
     
    #4
  5. Beasty54

    Beasty54 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    266
    Wholeheartedly agree. I think Djokovic may be the same way.
     
    #5
  6. MajinX

    MajinX Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Toronto
    i just watched it too coz of this thread and yea... u cant say that one call that wasnt even official while roddick was returning stole the 03 title...
     
    #6
  7. himynameisNIKE

    himynameisNIKE Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,429

    agreed.

    (10 char)
     
    #7
  8. 380pistol

    380pistol Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,903
    A lot of people here need to come to this thread, read and absorb.

    I'm not even a fan of Roddick but why isn't the overrule at 4-4 in the 5th set of the 2001 US Open QF ever mentioned??? Hhhhhhhmmmmmmm...........
     
    #8
  9. RCizzle65

    RCizzle65 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,932
    This one? It was 4-5 on Roddick's serve

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sr3A10qZkE
     
    #9
  10. Gen

    Gen Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    586
    No, Roddick didn't win that match fair and square. See the whole match rather than 1 set, and you'll find out that throughout the match the linesmen were playing together with Roddick, and the umpire was blind and deaf. Just another case when Americans wanted a win and bought it illegitimately. BTW I'm not Argentinian. Simply for me it is one of the two most disgraceful and dishonest matches in the current history of tennis.
     
    #10
  11. MajinX

    MajinX Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Toronto
    being argentinian shouldnt have anything to do with it.... but i didnt watch the match but did nalbandian not complain at all with all the bad line calls then? im sure in a 5 set match he woulda complained the hell out of umpire if sooo many bad line calls were made against him on purpose because its the uso..
     
    #11
  12. Feña14

    Feña14 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,423
    Location:
    England
    I saw the whole match live and some of the calls were shocking to be fair.
     
    #12
  13. iriraz

    iriraz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    3,973
    The best decision would have been in that tiebreak when that crazy guy yelled the ball out to stop the point and replay it.The third set was key for the match and Nalbandian lost not only the set but also the whole momentum with it.
     
    #13
  14. 380pistol

    380pistol Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,903
    Stop it. Nalbandian was up 2 sets, even had a match point with all that "cheating". He had his chances but didn't capitalize. Even the OP stated that scream should have effected Roddick more than Nalbandian.
     
    #14
  15. grafselesfan

    grafselesfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    3,594
    I agree with Arafel completely here.
     
    #15
  16. woodrow1029

    woodrow1029 Guest

    Can't replay the point for spectator noises.
     
    #16
  17. deltox

    deltox Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,639
    Location:
    NC, USA
    bought a win??? are you serious. thats some harsh accusations. this isnt boxing or college sports my friend.
     
    #17
  18. edmondsm

    edmondsm Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,904
    Location:
    In an in between place.
    Also a big Nalbandian fan. THE MAN WAS ROBBED!!! Only joking. Roddick deserved that win. If you can't finish, then you don't deserve the win. As we saw in IW, Nalbandian has an issue with finishing.
     
    #18
  19. deltox

    deltox Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,639
    Location:
    NC, USA
    i think as represented by this match and the WS at IW. spectators who make loud noises on purpose should be handled more harshly to detour others from thinking its ok.

    im not sure what CAN be done but something needs to be done to these "fans", who obviously arent fans of the sport.


    that being said, heckling a player you dislike on practice courts is perfectly ok.

    *innocent whistle*
     
    #19
  20. gj011

    gj011 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,548
    Location:
    Back from prison
    Disagree with OP and agree with Gen. It was blatant daylight robbery. Roddick should be ashamed of this win. He never deserved a slam title.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2009
    #20
  21. woodrow1029

    woodrow1029 Guest

    you would..
     
    #21
  22. deltox

    deltox Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,639
    Location:
    NC, USA
    im gonna go out on a limb and guess that you,, gulp, dont like andy roddick? i know its a long shot guess but..
     
    #22
  23. FD3S

    FD3S Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,173
    Why? I'm honestly curious about your reasoning here, b/c part of me wonders whether you have solid logic (as in some of your posts defending Djokovic), or if this is just another crack against Andy made on principle because you think he's a classless jerk.
     
    #23
  24. tintin

    tintin Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,438
    Location:
    none of your damn business
    he was given that USO,that's all!
     
    #24
  25. FD3S

    FD3S Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,173
    Yeah. Thanks to Nalbandian and his UE's, not a screaming idiot in the crowd.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2009
    #25
  26. OJ ROD

    OJ ROD Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    506
    It was in Nalbandian's hands, if he would handled that moment better, he probably would've won the match right in that set. He's a much better player than Roddick, and he was playing pretty well that day. He just became distracted from the task at hand.

    I think people spin this as "stolen" because most people have more respect for Nalbandian than for Roddick. Granted, neither are exemplary people, but at least Nalbandian is not as, well, an *******.(sorry tried to find a more civil word but i'm running out of time). Yeah, Nalbandian can be in your face sometimes but it's more cultural than anything. To some people he might seem like he's overreacting but that's just his calm reaction, he's not trying to intimidate or harrass, if he really was, you'd know.
     
    #26
  27. abmk

    abmk G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    15,980
    Location:
    U.S
    totally agree with the OP
     
    #27
  28. roddickfan90

    roddickfan90 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2008
    Messages:
    235
    so wat if nalbandian was robbed

    wimbledon 2004 - roddick was robbed (rain)
    US open 2002 - idiotic call against hewitt

    things happen get over it
     
    #28
  29. BorisBeckerFan

    BorisBeckerFan Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,164
    I think it would have needed to far more blatant to constitute him being robbed of the match. That being said, some points maybe of higher significance but every point counts.
     
    #29
  30. tangerine

    tangerine Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,194
    100% correct. It's just like the USTA to hand Federer five USO titles in a row over homeboy Roddick.
     
    #30
  31. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    Have Hewitt hand back his 2001 US Open trophy than to Roddick there was robbery also stop hating Roddick so much and get over the fact that he won a slam.
     
    #31
  32. l_gonzalez

    l_gonzalez Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    915
    Location:
    London
    That's a little harsh. Djokovic stepped up and won the Aussie Open, has won several Masters Series titles and has kept himself in the top 3 for a while. Ok, he might not be a Federer or Nadal kind of champion but he is definitely on a higher level in terms of mentality than Nalbandian. Djokovic has hit a rough patch lately, and even so, he still manages to win the vast majority of the matches that he SHOULD win... something that certainly can't be said of Nalbandian's career so far.

    Nalbandian: 27 years old, 10 titles from 20 finals. 2 Masters Series and a Tennis Masters Cup.

    Djokovic: 21 years old, 12 titles from 18 finals. 4 Masters Series, Tennis Masters Cup and Aussie Open.

    I'm not a fanboy or a hater, these are just facts.
     
    #32
  33. Joseph L. Barrow

    Joseph L. Barrow Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,255
    The audience-member shout thing is a ridiculous excuse. Some people go farther and claim that there was a systematic bias in Roddick's favor that gave him unfair line calls at crucial moments. I believe this, too, is highly exaggerated; there were instances where the ball was very close to the line and Nalbandian disagreed with the call, but we're not talking Williams-Capriati, here.
     
    #33
  34. Kaptain Karl

    Kaptain Karl Hall Of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    5,236
    Location:
    The High Country of Colorado
    I'm with Arafel.

    I think a lot of the "controversy" is rooted in how so many fans thought that was "Nalby's year." They allowed their hope and fanaticism to overcome their reason.

    Roddick won. Deal with it.

    - KK
     
    #34
  35. 380pistol

    380pistol Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,903
    Please explain this blatant robbery to me.
     
    #35
  36. tangerine

    tangerine Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,194
    Roddick/Nalbandian semi is on ESPN Classic right now. It pretty much proves the OP right on every point. :)
     
    #36
  37. clayman2000

    clayman2000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,849
    Like I said in another post, even if Nalby somehow wins that match.... it doesnt mean Roddick would be a 0 time slam winner. Nalby could gain momentum, take out Fed at the AO, and then JCF would win. Then Roddick stays no 1 and JCF is no 2. Then maybe Roddick wins Wimby 04, and maybe doesnt develop his paranoia with beating Fed in 04 - 05. Then maybe he losses less to the Mullers and Johansens.

    Either way the anti-Roddick argument is weak. Especially when people say Roddick is lucky to have won the USO. I mean he only won the 2 Masters before that
     
    #37
  38. Commando Tennis Shorts

    Commando Tennis Shorts Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,708
    Agreed. Just watched it on YouTube for the first time since it happened. If anything, the shouting should've screwed up Roddick, but it didn't. Instead, it screwed up Nalbandian. It was equal-opportunity screwage, but Roddick didn't blink. There's no way anyone can (a) blame Roddick for this, or (b) use it as an example of why Roddick's Slam title supposedly is not legitimate.
     
    #38
  39. AJK1

    AJK1 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,219
    Huh? It rained on Federer too !!

    Feds and Rods have played 3 wimby finals and Feds has won each time, he's just better, get over it!
     
    #39
  40. Michael Bluth

    Michael Bluth Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    758
    This is one of the most ridiculous complaints ever.

    Nalbandian was up a minibreak in the tiebreak and gave it back with his own unforced errors. I've also seen players play through yelling plenty of times in the pros.

    I just don't get him sometimes. Why did he lose in straights to Gaudio in 04? Why, in the 03 AO, after playing a great match to beat Fed, did he go out to Schuttler in the next round? He had a great chance to get to the final that year if he had won that match, since he would have been facing a Roddick who was tired from his epic against El Ayanoui.
     
    #40
  41. shawn1122

    shawn1122 Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,131
    I'm not really with the OP. The reason Andy was not screwed was because he was already prepared and committed to hit the ball, and thats what he did regardless of the call. Also, the linesperson calling that line would be directly behind him so he is in better position to hear if the call came from the crowd or not.

    For Nalbandian, if the call was made by a fan around where the line person is, it would be harder for him to tell the difference between a fan calling and the linesperson. still, even if he had a little doubt in his mind he should have kept playing. but perhaps he was quite certain that the call was legit.

    In all, I think Nalabandian was kind of screwed out of that set and that point. The rest of the match is completely his fault and something he has to live with.

    The guy who said that should have been kicked out immediately. I understand that while you watch live tennis you get the urge to call out sometimes when you think the ball is going out. I have said it out loud during matches too accidently. But there is no fricken need to yell it, that just makes no sense to me whatsoever, and there should be no tolerance for that. Send the guy home and let him watch the match on TV while he thinks about how stupid he was in that moment.
     
    #41

Share This Page