Yes, I too cringe whenever I see a new thread claiming Roger is the best ever. but a recent article caught my attention and I wanted to get the opinion of the community At the end of the day; if Roger wins 14 - 15 Slams but still is owned by Rafael Nadal; which he is. Make no mistake, Rafa owns his arse despite Federer taking the last 2, can one be considered a GOAT if you couldn't beat one player in question during his reign ? Did anyone own Pete ? Borg ?