The last 2 great clay courters at Roland Garros: who would win?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by goldark, Jul 10, 2007.

  1. goldark

    goldark New User

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1
    #1
  2. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    I'll go with Guga in 4 or 5 sets. One of his biggest weapons, the heavy topspin crosscourt forehand, is absolutely negated by the heavy topspin crosscourt backhand of Kuerten.

    Kuerten doesn't have the wheels of Nadal, but he has a better serve, and punishing strokes. Nadal couldn't dictate the points from his forehand, the same as Kuerten couldn't do it with his backhand.

    It's a toss, but I'd like to say Kuerten in 4 or 5. But close as hell.
     
    #2
  3. baseliner87

    baseliner87 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Messages:
    347
    gee though one!

    haven't seen much of kuerten so i'll go with rafa
     
    #3
  4. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Shouldn't you say "haven't seen much of kuerten so I can't give an objetive opinion" ? :D
     
    #4
  5. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    hey Andres, Kuerten had an awesome power backhand drive.
     
    #5
  6. 8PAQ

    8PAQ Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,002
    Nadal at his best takes it in straights.
     
    #6
  7. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    I know, and he usually dictated the points going crosscourt against less solid backhands. I remember Kuerten punishing Kafelnikov, who had a great backhand.

    But in this case, Kuerten can't control the point off that wing, cause it goes right into Nadal's vicious forehand. And viceversa, Nadal's FH goes into Kuerten's BH
     
    #7
  8. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    I see but then Kuerten can easily hit down the line. It would certainly be a great match to watch.
     
    #8
  9. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,879
    Definitely Nadal. Hewitt beat Guga in 3 straight sets in Guga's prime on clay in Gugas home town ina huge Davis cup match. Hewitt hasnt been very close to beating Nadal in a best of 5 clay match yet. And that's because Nadal is a in another league to Guga.
     
    #9
  10. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Kuerten can hit DTL at will, but that opens the court for Nadal to hit his GREAT GREAT GREAT backhand crosscourt on the run.
     
    #10
  11. aramis

    aramis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    575
    Guga was never known for outright consistency. He was a pure, 100% shotmaker.
     
    #11
  12. ATXtennisaddict

    ATXtennisaddict Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,278
    Nadal no doubt. Three FO in a row, nuff said.
     
    #12
  13. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    I think Nadal would win. Nadal is the best clay court player in the history of Tennis. Nadal winning 81 straight clay court matches and 3 straight French opens are the reasons why hes better then Guga on clay. Case closed.
     
    #13
  14. dima

    dima Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    727
    I think Guga, but only because his game matches up well against Nadals.
     
    #14
  15. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Against relatively poor clay competition.
    Case back open.
     
    #15
  16. akv89

    akv89 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,587
    I thought about this recently. If it's between Rafa's forehand and Kuerten's backhand, I'll have to go with Nadal. It would be an amazing match though.
     
    #16
  17. hectornorton

    hectornorton New User

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    60
    i loved guga i thought he was great but i don't think the level of competitors he had were that good to be honest.. i mean he beat some good solid clay court players like corretja or bruguera (not to mention that guy norman) but he never really played against heavy weights ( federer, nadal or even djoker)...

    i mean i think guga would have an extremely hard time in beating federer...

    i don't think he had the level to beat nadal.. nadal has fun playing against big tall players he makes them run all over the court....
     
    #17
  18. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Guga beat Federer in 2004 when Fed was #1 at the FO. In straights.
    And since when Djokovic is a "heavy weight" on clay ??

    Another solid clay courters Kuerten faced? Ferrero, Costa, Moya, Agassi, Kafelnikov, Moya, Muster, the in-form Coria... just to name a few.

    Djokovic... PLEASE!
     
    #18
  19. herosol

    herosol Professional

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,184
    i think its quite funny how people even suspect nadal to lose.

    no matter how good of a forehand Guga has, no one is a better ball chaser then Nadal.

    he would reach it, out grind Guga or any person who thinks they can even try to play with him on clay.

    im no nadal fan, but seriously, no way.
    i won't say straight sets, but definetley in 4, with the one Guga wins to be tight.
     
    #19
  20. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    alright, now it's my(Kuerten) shot. Kuerten would then run it down and hit a down the line forehand or wrong foot Nadal by hitting cross court to where Nadal was standing 15-0.
     
    #20
  21. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    But you're taking credit away from Nadal's footspeed, compared to Kuerten's. Why is Kuerten running the entire court to the other corner (to hit his FH) faster than Nadal (who's faster) running to get back in position to the CENTER of the court?

    And of course, the backhand on the run to the other corner is usually a winner, unless you're Cañas, Hewitt or Coria.
     
    #21
  22. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    I should have put a smiley Face in my post.
     
    #22
  23. superman1

    superman1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    5,243
    Seems like most people have forgotten about Coria. Coria might have been the best claycourter Nadal ever faced, and they had one hell of a tough, long 5 set match. I have no doubt that another even greater claycourter would have given Nadal plenty of trouble.
     
    #23
  24. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,465
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Agreed. All things being equal on the ground, Kuertnen's serve would definitely give him a slight edge.

    Additionally, not taking anything away from Rafa, but his clay court competition is weak compared to Guga's.
     
    #24
  25. aramis

    aramis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    575
    True. I always felt an in form Coria was better equipped than Roger to take down Rafa. Even in 05 you can argue Coria wasn't at his absolute best like the year before. He doesn't seem to mind Nadal's topspin that much.
     
    #25
  26. iamke55

    iamke55 Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,084
    If the two greatest were to face each other head to head at their best, the more recent one always wins because the competition gets stronger every single year. Not just in tennis, but in anything involving technological advances.
     
    #26
  27. Tennis_Monk

    Tennis_Monk Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,476
    I am surpised at this discussion. IMO Rafael Will win the tie with less discomfort. Kuerten has a hell of backhand no doubt But that cant match up with Rafael. Rafa is used to playing Righties with huge ground strokes.
    I am not so sure about Kuerten against lefty Dirt ballers. May be someone in this forum can post some Guga's results.

    Guga wasnt as dominating as Rafael. The argument that his competition is weak is a weak argument. He is so good that it makes his competition look wimpy.
     
    #27
  28. Bassus

    Bassus Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    249

    Its all about matchups I guess. I think the Federer of 2005 to now would beat peak Coria on clay quite comfortably. Even in 2004, I think Federer would have beaten Coria had he managed to make it to the final.

    I will give Coria credit though for how he pushed Nadal in that 05 match. He certainly did better than Federer did against Nadal in the French semfinal. That was a poor showing by Federer.
     
    #28
  29. CyBorg

    CyBorg Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,544
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Nadal has two forehands. He would win.
     
    #29
  30. Bassus

    Bassus Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    249
    As to Kuerten vs Nadal;

    I think Kuerten would win his fair share. I think he would have handled the high/heavy forehand to his own bh better than Federer has.

    Still, overall I'd say its Nadal 60%, Kuerten 40%.
     
    #30
  31. Matt H.

    Matt H. Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,279
    how good is Kuerten hitting those backhands from above his shoulder?
     
    #31
  32. brolycjw

    brolycjw New User

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    97
    Kuerten has the upper hand if the match is short, but in a 5 set match, Nadal would have the advantage as hitting a shoulder-height one-handed backhand consistently is physically demanding.
     
    #32
  33. jackson vile

    jackson vile Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,827
    Consider the fact that Nadal has not even hit his peak yet so no one has seen that form.

    Nadal keeps getting better, I really can't even believe it, every time I doubt him he does the impossbile.

    In other words Nadal would absolutely destroy Guga, believe it!
     
    #33
  34. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    He eats them for breakfast. It was his money shot ;)
     
    #34
  35. naffi

    naffi Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Messages:
    192
    I think Guga's serve would barely get him out of that match, but if it went the distance, (which, of course, it would) Nadal would have a physical edge. I still fantasize about Guga coming back, though, so I'm thinking French Open next year ...

    http://www.tenniswithattitude.blogspot.com

     
    #35
  36. rod99

    rod99 Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,197
    a lot of ignorance (and very short memories) are being shown on this board, as usual. i am not sure who would win but anyone who says that either player would win in straight sets doesn't know a whole lot about tennis. most people seem to think nadal would win (most of these people are probably still in high school, as well). these people don't understand that kuerten in his prime could handle the high backhand (unlike federer or sampras) with ease, his backhand up the line was sick, and he had a huge serve (much bigger than nadal).
     
    #36
  37. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Nadal would win 8 times out of 10 atleast. Kuerten was inconsistent even on clay. Look at alot of the losses he had in his prime in 1999-2001, despite all his success on clay, and his near losses to players who cant hold Nadal's jockstrap at the 3 French Opens he won. On his best day he might have a 50/50 chance, but only on his best day would he have any chance to beat Nadal on clay.
     
    #37
  38. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Stick a fork in him. He is done. Fantasizing a return to serious level of tennis from Kuerten, you might as well fantasize winning the lottery too.
     
    #38
  39. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    While I definitely see Nadal having the overall edge with Kuerten on clay, atleast this is a serious thread worth discussion. Unlike the bogus Agassi vs Nadal on clay thread which was more a humour thread for the most ridiculous and shameless of the Agassi homers. Atleast this thread you can have some serious discussion over.
     
    #39
  40. aramis

    aramis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    575
    Guga's serve was probably the most underrated part of his game. When he is setting up for it, he doesn't seem like he'll hit a huge serve, but he ends up serving a bomb anyway. I remember he didn't really alter his ball toss so it was tough to read. Same with his groundstrokes; his technique is the same whether he hits dtl or cross court. I remember Roger having trouble with that in their 2004 match.
     
    #40
  41. Steven87

    Steven87 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    522
    Nadal, because it will ultimately come down to fitness and consistency.
     
    #41
  42. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916
    An injured Guga took out Roger Federer in straights at the FO in 2004 I believe. Nadal can't even do that at the FO. Imagine what a healthy Guga would do.
     
    #42
  43. rafa_prestige89

    rafa_prestige89 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    200
    Now you said everything!
     
    #43
  44. Volly master

    Volly master Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    656
    GUGA's ROAD IN 1997

    1st Sláva Doseděl (Czech Republic) 6-0, 7-5, 6-1
    2nd Jonas Björkman (Sweden) 6-4, 6-2, 4-6, 7-5
    3rd Thomas Muster (Austria) 6-7(3), 6-1, 6-3, 3-6, 6-4
    4th Andrei Medvedev (Ukraine) 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 1-6, 7-5
    QF Yevgeny Kafelnikov (Russia) 6-2, 5-7, 2-6, 6-0, 6-4
    SF Filip Dewulf (Belgium) 6-1, 3-6, 6-1, 7-6(4)
    Final Sergi Bruguera (Spain) 6-3, 6-4, 6-2

    Former Champions in Bold: Sergi Bruguera (1993 and 1994), Thomas Muster (1995) and Yevgeny Kafelnikov (1996).

    Yes, Guga played in weak draw. Nadal is good, no doubt, but this victory was magical in its own right.
     
    #44
  45. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    None of those players hit as hard as Nadal. Muster needs time to setup his shot unlike Nadal.
     
    #45
  46. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916

    Beg to differ, Kafel could outblast Nadal any day of the week on a hardcourt, he just can't keep up with the grinding part.
     
    #46
  47. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    That is just one match. One could turn around and say Federer beat Kuerten pretty easily in the final set in 2002 on a match on clay, when Kuerten was much higher ranked then a green Federer. So in 2 matches, Kuerten did better then Nadal ever did vs Federer in 1 of the 2, but much worse then Nadal ever did vs Federer in 6 of their 7 matches in the other 1 of those 2. Nadal on the other hand has only lost to Federer once on clay, and it was when he was too worn out to play normal.
     
    #47
  48. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Kuerten vs Federer on clay:

    2002 Hamburg quarters: Federer defeats Kuerten 6-0, 1-6, 6-2
    2004 French Open 3rd round: Kuerten defeats Federer 6-4, 6-4, 6-4


    Nadal vs Federer on clay:

    2005 French Open semis: Nadal defeats Federer 6-3 4-6 6-4 6-3
    2006 Monte Carlo final: Nadal defeats Federer 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(5)
    2006 Rome final: Nadal defeats Federer 6-7(0) 7-6(5) 6-4 2-6 7-6(5)
    2006 French Open final: Nadal defeats Federer 1-6 6-1 6-4 7-6(4)
    2006 Monte Carlo final: Nadal defeats Federer 6-4 6-4
    2006 Hamburg final: Federer defeats Nadal 2-6 6-2 6-0
    2006 French Open final: Nadal defeats Federer 7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(3) 2-6 6-2

    Also if Federer ever played as crummy a match vs Nadal on clay as he played that 3rd round vs Kuerten at the French Open that year, Nadal would smoke him much worse then Kuerten did. There would have been bagels and breaksticks if he played that lousy vs Nadal. Luckily for Federer he has never shown up play that kind of crap tennis vs Nadal on any surface.
     
    #48

Share This Page