THE most consistent baseliner ever?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Steven87, Jul 19, 2006.

  1. Steven87

    Steven87 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    522
    Id say either Coria or JCF...man do Spanish players know how to rally
     
    #1
  2. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,611
    Michael Chang or Lleyton hewitt
     
    #2
  3. Jack the Hack

    Jack the Hack Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,802
    Only 1 slam between Coria and JCF...

    If you're talking about most consistant baseliner EVER, you gotta go with players like Bjorn Borg (11 Slams) or Mats Wilander (7 slams). Both could rally all day without seemingly getting tired, and both rarely made an unforced error. Their consistancy also carried over onto multiple surfaces as well. Borg won the French on clay, Wimbledon on grass, and made the US Open final on hard courts. Wilander won the French on clay, the Australian when it was played on grass, and the US and Australian Opens on hard court. (Wilander is one of only three players to win a slam on all three surfaces - the others being Connors and Agassi.)
     
    #3
  4. Ultra2HolyGrail

    Ultra2HolyGrail Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Messages:
    2,519
    Mats Willander.
     
    #4
  5. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    34,710
    Chrissie..........
     
    #5
  6. typingchamp

    typingchamp Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    103
    Kuerten. He also had offense though.

    Nadal can have stretches of almost ZERO unforced errors due to his high clearance over the net (I think he had five unforced errors total in set two and set three at the French Open finals . . . someone correct me please if I am wrong). With his high racquet head speed, he can shank and few though . . . plus he plays really aggressively which also leads to more errors than the other players.

    Hmm . . . I chose two fairly offensive-style defenders . . . but I think they were the best.
     
    #6
  7. acetennisman

    acetennisman Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Messages:
    156
    muster.. the man
     
    #7
  8. Dilettante

    Dilettante Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,108
    Location:
    Katy Perry's belly button
    Borg.

    Ten characters: Bjorn.
     
    #8
  9. 35ft6

    35ft6 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,557
    Nadal is probably the most consistent baseliner I've ever seen within the context of how relentlessly heavy, potent, and/or powerful his shots are. I was noticing during the Wimbledon final, I was surprised every time he missed. I realized that no matter what his positioning was, if he could touch the ball I expected him to get the ball in. And this on grass! There are certainly guys who are strictly more about consistency, and probably surpass Nadal on sheer consistency alone, but they're not nearly as impressive to me.
     
    #9
  10. Ano

    Ano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,572
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Man: Bjorn Borg, he kept the game simple and safe. He only aimed his groundstrokes two yards from the service line, and hit them sometimes down the line, sometimes crosscourt. He didn't use complex strategy, but he did use his heavy topspin, speed and endurance to wear down his opponents.

    Woman: Christ Evert. 125 match winning streak on clay. Enough said.
     
    #10
  11. scotus

    scotus Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,520
    Whether we agree or not, Andre Agassi deserves mention.
     
    #11
  12. rod99

    rod99 Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,197
    borg. noone else is close except maybe wilander.
     
    #12
  13. oscar_2424

    oscar_2424 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,239
    Location:
    Hallandale, Florida
    Thomas Muster
     
    #13
  14. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,611
    I would also add Roger Federer as one of the most consistent baseliners ever.
     
    #14
  15. looseswing

    looseswing Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,340
    Location:
    Garden State
    I second that.
     
    #15
  16. clayman2000

    clayman2000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,849
    cmonnnnnnnnn wat about lleyton hewitt...he can scramble forever
     
    #16
  17. Alexandros

    Alexandros Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,400
    Chris Evert overall and Lleyton Hewitt amongst the men.
     
    #17
  18. callitout

    callitout Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,303
    Greg Rusedski.
     
    #18
  19. sandiegotennisboy

    sandiegotennisboy Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    698
    i heard evert was a wall. in most recent times, hingis is the best i can think of.

    i agree with the vote on hewitt and i have to add nadal. their games are based on being "walls".
     
    #19
  20. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,611
    hahahahaha, ill second that, Ivo Karlovic
     
    #20
  21. tennisboy87

    tennisboy87 Guest

    Lleyton Hewitt. He is like a wall. He rarely makes an unforced error.
     
    #21
  22. zhan

    zhan Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,005
    another vote for nadal...
    :mrgreen:
     
    #22
  23. 35ft6

    35ft6 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,557
    I've never seen an elite player shank as many routine balls as Federer. His backhand is a brick machine.
     
    #23
  24. wimble10

    wimble10 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    590
    Mats Wilander
     
    #24
  25. zhan

    zhan Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,005
    Fed has been hitting LIGHTS OUT this year...
    even if he shanks a ball ... but then he comes back and hits 20 winners in a row to make up for it ...
     
    #25
  26. brucie

    brucie Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,318
    Another? Did anyone mention hi,?
    Well he deserves it a vote for nadal.

    JuanCF DESERVES RECOGNITION TOO. YET HE FAILS TO HIT WINNERS!


    I was tempted to mention Fed and then remembered :
     
    #26
  27. str33t

    str33t Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,334
    nadal because his shots have so much topspin and high clearance over the net.
     
    #27
  28. brucie

    brucie Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,318
    My reason exactly. ;)
     
    #28
  29. aramis

    aramis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    575
    They used to be the best...now they are just lazy.
     
    #29
  30. Mikael

    Mikael Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,037

    I know you're making fun of Greg "The Grin" Rusedski, but you'd be surprised... I remember Greg giving guys like Agassi and Enqvist a lot of trouble in baseline rallies by simply rallying patiently and not making any errors on his slice backhand. Rafter would use the same kind of tactic. Those guys were *supposed* to be so bad from the baseline, and they'd hold serve so often, that they didn't have much pressure at all during baseline rallies and all the pressure was on their opponents to come up with the goods.
     
    #30
  31. ShooterMcMarco

    ShooterMcMarco Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    3,017
    I'm goin with Nadal, Fed, Hewitt and Davydenko for the current men's game. Ultimately, I think Rafa edges the rest.
     
    #31
  32. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    If consistency is doing LESS Unforced Errors, and returning every ball back, and hit some winners, Guillermo CaƱas is another modern guy to pay attention to.
    Check his UE stats, like 15 per match only :)
     
    #32
  33. chrisplchs

    chrisplchs Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    879
    all time, borg and chang
     
    #33
  34. tpduke112

    tpduke112 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    350
    Nalbandian.
     
    #34
  35. Max G.

    Max G. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    4,355
    Who was it that once won a french open final with only three unforced errors all match long? I don't remember who that was.

    ...maybe I'm thinking of McEnroe at Wimbledon...
     
    #35
  36. rod99

    rod99 Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,197
    wilander missed like 3 or 4 first serves for the entire match in the french open 1988 final against leconte.
     
    #36
  37. Mike213

    Mike213 New User

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Messages:
    56
    I'd say Max Myrni takes this one...definately, no doubt...
     
    #37
  38. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,834
    Location:
    New York City
    Borg.

    If you don't say Borg, you're wrong. It's not really up to opinion. Six French Opens people. He hit with so much topspin. It always dropped in.

    If you didn't say Borg, then you haven't seen him play, and with a wood racquet no less.

    Honorable mentions: Wilander, Agassi, Muster, Chang.
     
    #38
  39. Jack the Hack

    Jack the Hack Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,802
    That is the problem... I don't think most people on this board have seen Borg play (or Wilander, Muster, and Chang for that matter). As I posted earlier, Borg gets my vote, with Wilander coming in second. Some of the modern guys like Coria, Canas, or JCF shouldn't even be in the discussion of most consistant EVER.
     
    #39
  40. VamosRafa

    VamosRafa Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,202
    ^^^ That's the problem with age -- it dates us.

    I admire what Rod Laver accomplished, but thankfully, I wasn't around to personally watch his many accomplishments. If I did, then I truly would be "Granny Nadal."

    And I don't think many fans here were either -- I suspect the folks that did watch him either don't own computers, or if they do, don't visit tennis websites. Otherwise, we'd have more threads about whether Laver in his prime would beat Pete in his. :D

    So, we really can't fault tennis supporters for not watching the game in the 70's, especially if they hadn't been born.

    We all take the experiences we have, and bring them to the board. And in some ways it would be nice if the folks who watched Laver could weigh in on it. But in the meantime, we do have folks around who can tell us about the rivalries in the 70's and the days of playing with wood racquets. And I think that's terrific. I did watch some of those "now classic" matches live, but at the time I didn't know they were going to be classics. I just thought they were fun to watch -- I especially liked the Connors/McEnroe clashes, because I hated Johnny Mac. Funny, because now I like him.

    There so much to admire as to each generation of players, IMO, and it's hard to compare and contrast the generations. Racquet technology has changed, along with player fitness standards.

    Who knows how those players would have adjusted to today's physical sport? Who knows if today's players could have had the touch and finesse to play with wood racquets and faster surfaces?

    We don't need to decide that, though. We just need to appreciate the accomplishments of past players, and recognize that when we discuss who is the best baseliner, volleyer or whatever, it's all relative.
     
    #40
  41. Crichton

    Crichton New User

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    78
    Chris Evert over everyone, male or female

    That said, men would be Wilander or Borg (maybe Nadal)
    Current women maybe Hingis
     
    #41
  42. omniexist

    omniexist Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Messages:
    560
    I pick Lendl.
     
    #42
  43. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    Chang wasn't that consistent. Let me put it this way: He always
    wanted to attack but did not get many actual chances.
    He had that mind-set. He was hard court specialist.
    When he won FO, he won it by selectively attacking..
     
    #43
  44. theace21

    theace21 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,263
    Old timers -
    Bjorn Borg

    Eddie Dibbs
    Harold Solomon

    Both two had no weapons but you had to stay all day to beat them...Remember the moon ball.
     
    #44
  45. vegasgt3

    vegasgt3 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    329
    Wow! Exactly!!!

    If you haven't seen Eddie Dibbs play Harold Solomon with a rally of over sixty strokes 15-0, then 45 strokes, 15-15, then over 55, 30-15 - -you get the idea. They would stay out there four hours for a 6-4, 4-6, 6-4 match.

    Borg was impatient in comparison.
     
    #45
  46. Roy

    Roy Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2006
    Messages:
    441
    Nadal
    Agassi
    Chang
     
    #46
  47. laurie

    laurie Guest

    Borg, Chris Evert.

    Players today? Tatiana Golovin has the potential to be a very consistent baseliner. She doesn't make many mistakes and surprisingly her forehand reminds me of Chris Evert. She's still young enough to make a breakthrough at the highest level.
     
    #47
  48. johnkidd

    johnkidd Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    725
    Borg...he would play matches against the backboard for practice and have to hit a certain amount of balls in the same spot to win the point. It was something crazy like 75-100 balls in a row. Wilander was basically a Borg clone. Lendl could also go out and grind because he was so mell conditoned, but he had the added dimension of the big forehand and serve. None of the guys nowadays can compare because very few of them know how to contruct a point.
     
    #48
  49. ironchef21

    ironchef21 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    126
    Borg, Lendl and Wilander
     
    #49
  50. 35ft6

    35ft6 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,557
    Maybe in the beginning, but didn't he go a stretch where he only hit slice backhands? And he was a legitimate all court player, by the end he was way beyond Borg.
     
    #50

Share This Page