the myth: S&V can beat Nadal on clay

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by tennis_hand, Jun 8, 2008.

  1. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427
    the proponents of net rushers say, S&V can take away time from Nadal and it's impossible Nadal can hit passing shots every time.

    I think it is time to say: it is impossible that the net rusher can hit a good volley every time. and if the volley is not good, then Nadal can pass you.

    Fed's net game was below his standard today. but we also see how Nadal can hit those passing shots.
     
    #1
  2. samster

    samster Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,017
    Not just against Nadal, pure S+V has little chance on clay against majority of ATP players.
     
    #2
  3. coloskier

    coloskier Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,487
    Tell that to Stepanek, who has beaten all but the top clay courters on clay using serve and volley.
     
    #3
  4. Legend of Borg

    Legend of Borg Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,932
    Location:
    Pazardjik, Bulgaria
    How can serve and volleyers thrive when the surfaces are being slowed down? Even grass, the fastest surface, has been ovetaken by the U.S. Open. What a sham.
     
    #4
  5. samster

    samster Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,017
    Oh, okay. Tell me how many clay court tournaments did Stepanek win so far in his career?

    (The Answer: Zero).
     
    #5
  6. cujays

    cujays Professional

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,195
    he stands so far behind the baseline that he has more time
     
    #6
  7. downthewall

    downthewall Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    227
    lol. you guys are just mad that nadal ownz everyone
     
    #7
  8. CyBorg

    CyBorg Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    5,544
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Yes and Stepanek isn't a huge talent.

    The serve and volley isn't being taught in tennis academies anymore which is why it is dying out.

    Sweden, for example, produced one successful server and volleyer in Stefan Edberg, which happened as a fluke. Edberg was trained as a baseliner, but decided to change his style.

    It might happen again, but it would have to be likewise a fluke.

    The serve and volley works, especially if you have a big serve. A big serve leaves the returner vulnerable, while a well-placed volley ensures against a big passing shot, because it limits the player's time for a windup, necessitating a quick flick shot or a volley.

    We had an Ivanisevic/Rafter final not that long ago. Both of these guys were experts at this.
     
    #8
  9. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    Coming to net on clay wins you nothing but an early handshake.
     
    #9
  10. alienhamster

    alienhamster Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,658
    It doesn't have to be serve and volley. I actually think it's the *correct* play to be looking to move forward after you've struck the first rally shot against Nadal. You're going to get passed a bunch, sure, but at this point I'd wager your winning percentage at net has got to be higher than from the back of the court. A short angled volley is far more effective against Nadal than a well-struck "winner" from the baseline.
     
    #10
  11. carlos djackal

    carlos djackal Professional

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,246
    Location:
    near a tennis court
    Nadal Can Retrieve The Ball From Anywhere In The Court And Can Pass Anyone With Precision(at Least On Clay) As We'd Seen Today, So It's Not The Solution To The Nadal Riddle..........the Problem Of How To Beat A Healthy Nadal On Clay Is Still Unsolved.....and Probably Will Remain For 3 More Yrs ....
     
    #11
  12. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,672
    I'll say it right here. Nadal is vulnerable to sharp crosscourt angle shots. If any player can hit the crosscourt shots with sharp angles consistently, they'll have a good chance against Nadal. Much like the way Nalbandian bageled Nadal last year in Paris Masters I think.
     
    #12
  13. Dilettante

    Dilettante Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,108
    Location:
    Katy Perry's belly button
    That was no clay.
     
    #13
  14. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,672
    It was not clay, but it is still a good strategy to utilize against Nadal. Much like the way Davydenko did against Nadal last year.
     
    #14
  15. dh003i

    dh003i Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,050
    S&V-ing every point, no. But you have to come in. Federer was most successful today when he came in to the net, even there he had to play perfectly.
     
    #15
  16. Dilettante

    Dilettante Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,108
    Location:
    Katy Perry's belly button
    At the moment, on clay, there's not any good strategy against Nadal.

    On other surfaces there are plenty. But on a claycourt... just forget it.
     
    #16
  17. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    Fed's performance today wasn't a good example of s&v net rushing tactics. Many of his volleys sat up which would give any half-decent player an easy pass.
     
    #17

Share This Page