The Secret to Nadals...dare i say..defeat

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by darknight08, Jun 3, 2006.

  1. darknight08

    darknight08 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    122
    After I saw Nadal play against Federer and other people, especially today, i think i may have found out how to beat this guy. But first....

    Why is Nadal so good? Well, of course it takes about 4 capable winner shots to actually win a point. Nadal uses his speed.

    But what would happen if Nadal looses that speed or even for a bit. What happens if he gets winded? Then, It might start taking about 2 or even 1 capable winning shot to seal the deal.


    So whats the secret?


    Drop Shots. PLay along with him hitting deep balls, hit a dropshot and watch him sprint to the net. Finish it off with a volley or whatever. Now watch the next rally. I bet he wont be as fast, hes ofcourse not superman. It might not take a full effect early but what If the opponent continues doing this...imagine the full effect later on in the 3rd? 4th set? or 5th?

    I dont think Mathieu did enough drop shots against Nadal.

    You have to use his greatest weapon against him.
     
    #1
  2. malakas

    malakas Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,791
    Location:
    Greece
    Well if Federer watched this match,he must have drawn some interesting conclusions..;)
     
    #2
  3. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    OMG! Now I know how to beat Nadal!
    Is it too late to join RG? It is?
    Damn... heh, well... next year ;)
     
    #3
  4. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,949
    I thought Mathieu stayed back too much, come foward and smash the forehand.
     
    #4
  5. unjugon

    unjugon Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    332
    You donĀ“t think Mathieu attacked enough with this forehand? Wilander was saying how it was one of the best and most effective forehands he had ever seen, really hard to predict where he was going with the shot, going mid spin, heavy spin, opening up the court, flatenning it out down the line, etc etc
     
    #5
  6. MR. 81

    MR. 81 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    267
    And what if you have a bad draw and you don't play against him? Tell me Andres how will you win that one? :mrgreen:
     
    #6
  7. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    I'll ask to the tourney's director to play Nadal in 1st.

    He'll look at me like: "What? You wanna play Nadal on clay on 1st round!? That's suicide! Ok, deal!" Muehehe, Nadal won't ever see it coming... :twisted:
     
    #7
  8. MR. 81

    MR. 81 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    267
    I will call your tactic the "Banana Backstabbing" :mrgreen:
     
    #8
  9. siber222000

    siber222000 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    648
    nah.. i think nadal only did like 12 net play when mathieu did like 46 and more
     
    #9
  10. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    I prefer "Banana Impaling" ;)

    But... where is the DropShot in the name? :mrgreen:
     
    #10
  11. Max G.

    Max G. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    4,356
    You know, a drop shot is a pretty hard shot to pull off. You make it sound like it's that easy - "oh, all you have to do is hit a dropshot and then put away the easy volley, do that for two sets and then you'll tire him out". But Dropshots are VERY hard to pull off when you're not in good position. Especially when Nadal's hitting his incredible topspin.

    And since he's fast, it takes a damn good dropshot to win the point against him - if you screw up, you'll end up being passed if you come to net or, if you stay back, counter-dropshot.

    And of course, hitting a dropshot actually means the point is going to be SHORTER - the point is almost guaranteed to be over within 2-3 shots after the dropshot, whereas with a baseline rally it can go on for ages and ages. So by dropshotting, you're actually fatiguing Nadal LESS than you would by running him around from the baseline. Plus you're giving away lots of free points, since you're trying a difficult play way too often, making it pretty low-percentage. And giving away free points also makes the match shorter.
     
    #11
  12. MR. 81

    MR. 81 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    267
    You're right I completely messed it up :mad:
    Probably because I realised earlier on that the real strategy to beat him must involve a carefully placed banana (easier to make it look like an accident than vive le beau jeu's shotgun choice)
     
    #12
  13. LowProfile

    LowProfile Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,441
    Federer has more than enough touch for brilliant drop shots, as he occasionally shows us (they usually bounce back towards the net after they land) but he has stated over and over again that he hates the drop shot.

    He'd rather blast the opponent off the court.
     
    #13
  14. Rep. Timothy Calhoun

    Rep. Timothy Calhoun Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    196
    That's because he wants people to "think" so.

    I love to hit low shots, but my opponents think that I hate them. ;)
     
    #14
  15. LowProfile

    LowProfile Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,441
    Yes well Federer doesn't hit drop shots much. He reason he states that he hates them is because he is asked in post-match conferences why he doesn't drop shot more.
     
    #15
  16. BabolatFan

    BabolatFan Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    790
    Location:
    East Coast
    Well I have nothing against Nadal and I think that he's very very talented -- on clay. However, he's not an all-surface player. He was a bit vulnerable earlier against Mathieu. Nadal got smacked around deep. I'm sure Federer got his drawing board out during the match and jotted down some tactics. I don't want Hewitt to beat him in the next round coz out of respect, Nadal deserves to lose to Federer instead. This would make one of the most exciting finals...if Nadal doesn't lose in straight sets.:p
     
    #16
  17. brucie

    brucie Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,318
    I love it when this happens in mixed once in the first game i did some mint 2h backhands it continued and after 3 games the man said stop playing to his backhand hit everything on his forehand i heard thats why i know and they did that was fun forehand sitter 2nd serves from there on whoo! managed to lose still they were actually a really good pair but i got off the hook with a few decent bhs! Haha
     
    #17
  18. dandy2fast

    dandy2fast Rookie

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    191
    Anywhere else than on clay, P.H Mathieu would have won the match today against Nadal.
     
    #18
  19. HollerOne5

    HollerOne5 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    644
    Coulda shoulda woulda

    They certainly have met on hardcourts before, Nadal won those as well buddy
     
    #19
  20. superman1

    superman1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    5,243
    If Nadal was out of breath from getting a drop shot, he'd take 20 seconds, towel himself off, and be ready for the next point. That strategy doesn't really work. If you hit a drop shot off of every other point, sooner or later he'd get the hint and he'd be running forward before you even hit the dropper.
     
    #20
  21. Chadwixx

    Chadwixx Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,639
    Hitting a drop shot off a pro's ball is much harder than at the club lvl. Its like returning a serve with a drop shot. I prefer the mid court slice, not so do or die.
     
    #21
  22. darknight08

    darknight08 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    122
    All of yall are saying the drop shots are hard. Well, they are Pros for a reason. Most of them can do it.

    And about 20 second breaks, well that only go so far.
     
    #22
  23. Aykhan Mammadov

    Aykhan Mammadov Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,673
    Location:
    Baku, Azerbaijan
    To post 1.

    As some posters wrote already drop-shot is good but hard shot and risky enough. It is not possible to use it all-the time, so tactics can't be based on drop-shots only. After all even if u can imagine somebody using it against Nadal all the time why not to assume that Nadal can also use it against him and thus there are equal chances to fatigue each other to the 3-d set.

    Coria did use drop-shots against Nadal but lost. Coria's drop-shots are best in the world.

    Chances are more really if u can come to the net more often, and this tactics is being realised against Nadal, it is why he lose on hard and grass. Simply rushing to the net on the clay demands more preparation and more timing, it is why net tactics can't be used alone against Nadal on the clay.

    I think there is not simple tactics against him. Very diversified game as Fed has got, more sliced strokes, high speed and physical condition of a player, everything alltogether may win him.
     
    #23
  24. arosen

    arosen Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,101
    Beating Nadal by hitting a dropshot all the time is not an option, and it's unfair to Mathew to say he wasn't using it enough. Remember all the wonderful drop volleys Paul hit? Those are better than drops. He was coming in on good stuff, finishing off at the net with dropvolleys, and he was successful doing that. I think what kills a lot of Nadal's opponens is they overhit the ball a lot, and they miss or give Nadal pace he feeds off. To beat a guy like Rafa on clay, you have to go in feeling supremely fit and totally mentally prepared to stay out there and rally with him for 5 hours plus. With this mindset and some solid play Hewitt or Fed or Blake would have a shot at Rafa even on clay.
     
    #24
  25. Max G.

    Max G. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    4,356
    Nadal's also a pro for a reason. Because he can hit groundstrokes heavy enough to PREVENT his opponent from being able to hit a good dropshot, even if his opponent is a pro.

    It's like saying that all Mathieu has to do is hit aces - after all, he's a pro, he can hit aces! That ignores the fact that there's another pro on the other side of the net wanting to prevent him from hitting aces, and prevent him from getting any shots he could comfortably hit dropshots off of.
     
    #25
  26. Lindros13

    Lindros13 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    690
    Location:
    Northern New Jersey
    You stated that the drop shot technique will start to work in the 3rd 4th or 5th set but that implies that he doesn't wipe you off the court before then. To beat Nadal with high topspin and drop shots means to beat him at his own game. No one yet has yet shown they can really beat him (especially at his own game) on this surface.
     
    #26
  27. D-man

    D-man Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    752
    Yes, good point. (Wow, a balanced and reasonable opinion from Aykhan!! ;) )
     
    #27

Share This Page