The Women seem uneasy. If the Men boycott around the Pay issue, organizers will face

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by DeShaun, Sep 9, 2012.

  1. DeShaun

    DeShaun Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,837
    a tough choice, cut their own pay and decrease their own slice of the pie, or cut the women's pay to appease the men on utilitarian value-added grounds, eschewing engineered artificial equality.

    If the men compel organizers to fork over more revenue and share it with the guys by striking in solidarity united as men, what other choice can the organizers make?

    I think we're going to see the men move to always three sets only as long as the women are making the same pay yet more of it by being objectively better aided in playing both doubles and singles which the men cannot do without running their bodies down.

    In the example below, A has more than doubled B's earnings in this year.
    A. http://legacy.tennis.com/players/player_stats.aspx?player_name=Sara+Errani
    B. http://legacy.tennis.com/players/player_stats.aspx?player_name=Philipp+Kohlschreiber
    Anyone objective who has watched B play knows this discrepancy is patently unjust.

    Before anyone says, "Well maybe B is just not good enough to hack in doubles," I will preempt with saying "maybe so--but next to the women, the men are treated like slaves in terms of the physical demands placed on them by having to deal with five sets."
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2012
    #1
  2. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,066
    Kohlschreiber can have a sex change and compete with the women if he wants to.
     
    #2
  3. tenniscasey

    tenniscasey Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    426
    ATP has stated it won't back a boycott, and a few ATP stars have said a boycott is unlikely.
     
    #3
  4. DRII

    DRII Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    6,446
    the proposed boycott has nothing to do with men's vs women's pay...
     
    #4
  5. Evan77

    Evan77 Banned

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,745
    boycott, shmocott... it's never gonna happen. I, personally couldn't care less how much money they get paid. I didn't even bother watching the women final this year as I would rather listen to some good music then listen to Azarenka screaming.

    As far as I'm concerned they can get rid of the whole WTA tour and that would be fine with me. boring, non inspiring. Serena can get away with anything , Russians are all boring screamers ...

    look at the stands, even at slams, when women are playing. EMPTY. nobody cares.
     
    #5
  6. Matt H.

    Matt H. Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,279
    i gotta be honest, there's a reason why the WTA wants more combined events with the men....because the women are an added bonus, not a stand alone attaction.
     
    #6
  7. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,599
    There's no boycott and there is more than enough room to increase prize monies for both competitions.

    Its the men doing the pushing, that's all.
     
    #7
  8. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,599
    Tournaments want women because they add considerably to the sporting package they can offer sponsors, even if the matches aren't as well supported at the gate.
     
    #8
  9. Govnor

    Govnor Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,333
    mixed events are easily the best deal for everyone involved. I don't personally think the Men can win the "pay us more than the women" debate, but they can most certainly win the "well then we're playing best of 3" debate. Which will suck for the fans, but there it is.

    I wonder how that would impact revenues too. Can't do anything but bring them down, right?
     
    #9
  10. Tcbtennis

    Tcbtennis Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,319
    This isn't even an issue. The women's prize money won't be touched. The extra money would come out of the enormous profits that the AO makes.
     
    #10
  11. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,503
    Location:
    So Cal
    The chances of getting all the ATP players to unite, even if the Oil Money Open in Dubai had been put together, were always nil. Quite a few of the top 50 would have gone to Melbourne for the shot at a major. They wouldn't care how many fans would put an asterisk beside it - their name would still be on the trophy.

    The players need to work with the ATP to grow the sport - bigger pie, more to go around.
     
    #11
  12. THUNDERVOLLEY

    THUNDERVOLLEY G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    10,528
    Not gonna happen.
     
    #12
  13. tennisMVP

    tennisMVP Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    507
    At least the Australian Open will still have Nadal (as he resigned from the ATP Player Council).
     
    #13
  14. Flat Top

    Flat Top New User

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    38
    Pay them according to the income they generate.
     
    #14
  15. Soianka

    Soianka Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,931
    This is my understanding
     
    #15
  16. nadalforum

    nadalforum New User

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2012
    Messages:
    11
    I'm all for women having equal pay. But they need more good looking women and less manly ones. Come on, i know we live in an OVER-POLITICALLY CORRECT era, but there's a reason why only the good looking women get CENTER COURT and the ugly ones who are better ranked don't get it.
     
    #16

Share This Page