Theory of defeating Roger Federer

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by sliceroni, Feb 20, 2004.

  1. sliceroni

    sliceroni Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    865
    Many of us said that only attacking tennis can give Fedex trouble. Henman once again proves that theory. Federer can neutralize big serves, big groundstrokes, but when you have a solid s&v attacker or all-courter it matches well against his game. If Henman troubles Federer then Sampras, Becker, Stich and Edberg in my mind would give Federer more than he can handle.
     
    #1
  2. Nosoupforyou

    Nosoupforyou Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    246
    I'm not sure about his total match record vs Sampras, but i know Federer beat him in the U.S. open a couple of years ago
     
    #2
  3. PureCarlosMoyaDrive

    PureCarlosMoyaDrive Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,118
    Actually only one match ever between the two. Fed won at Wimbledon 2001, ending Sampras' 31 match win streak, 7-6 5-7 6-4 6-7 7-5. Must have been an INSANE MATCH!! But ya, attack Fed a lot and you can probably beat him, but still, not everytime.
     
    #3
  4. Nosoupforyou

    Nosoupforyou Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    246
    Yah your right, just knew that he beat him in one major match
     
    #4
  5. Markus Kaila

    Markus Kaila Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    199
    .......is very simple. Hold your serve, just hold your serve! You really need nothing else.... Oh, still one thing more: you need luck in tie-breaks.
     
    #5
  6. sliceroni

    sliceroni Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    865
    Yeah, that Federer/Sampras match was insane. I remember Sampras missed a crushing overhead on a crucial point. Federer was playing out of his mind, tight match to the end and it looked as if each were playing almost a mirrior image of each other. At that time Sampras was at the start of his decline, hadn't won a tournament since the Wimbledon before that.
     
    #6
  7. prince

    prince Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    752
    i have seen matches before where fed got blasted off the court by patrick trafter in a hardcourt . but this was before he got out of his shell .
     
    #7
  8. Ariel

    Ariel Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    128
    The postulate is true: You only can beat Federer with an attacking game. But you have to be REALLY extraordanary at it. Please look to the Safin-Federer AO final: Safin tried in his first 4 service games some S&V, and Roger nailed him every single time.
    Or when Roddick tries to do the same, Roger often makes him look silly at the net.

    So, hats off to Henman for that victory. Now Tim have to figure out how to win over his nemesis, Hewitt.
     
    #8
  9. emcee

    emcee Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    How does Federer return serve so well? He returns a lot better than the much-hyped returns of Hewitt and Agassi...Roddick can ace Agassi to death, but not Fed.
     
    #9
  10. Tim Tiger Henman

    Tim Tiger Henman Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    265
    Actually Tim's arch nemesis is called "Men's Semi-final day at Wimbledon". Its a tough opponent and one that he may never beat. But I have good news - an Englishman will finally win the mens single at Wimbledon this year. Trust me on this one - I have inside knowledge.
     
    #10
  11. Nosoupforyou

    Nosoupforyou Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    246
    Agassi's serve return is hyped up man you gotta be kidding me he returned roddick's 149mph serve and won the point i dont think even federer could do that
     
    #11
  12. g14

    g14 Guest

    Sliceroni, its what we have been saying all along. Its quite true. By the way, there were 4 breaks in the first set in the Aussie Open final. So it was more about holding nerve.
     
    #12
  13. @wright

    @wright Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,567
    Constantly attacking Federer can make you look very silly. I think it's being overanalyzed, you have to be VERY VERY good at attacking or VERY VERY good at counterpunching to beat him.
     
    #13
  14. Tim Tiger Henman

    Tim Tiger Henman Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    265
    Has anyone considered - just the possibility that Fed had an off day, and maybe Tim got lucky? After all if you execute a bad game-plan often enough it will pay off eventually.
     
    #14
  15. jun

    jun Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    548
    I think serve-volleyer with decent groundies with reasonably big serve can give Federer trouble. Federer gets a lot of return back, but they aren't as forcing as Hewitt's or Agassi's. It tends to float, i think. So s-v can take advantage of these returns.

    Henman's also very talented as far as eye-hand coordination and quickness. Just not as much fire power.

    Agassi and Hewitt and Federer all have different returns. Federer might have biggest wing span of all. He get a lot of return back. He wants to start the point as neutral as possible.

    Agassi does get a lot of ball back, take them early, and puts a lot of pace on the ball. He wants to start the point in offensive position.

    Hewitt gets a lot of ball back, directs them very well, but not necessary hits hard..
     
    #15
  16. Max G.

    Max G. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    4,356
    That wasn't luck. Henman is 6-1 against Fed, with the 1 loss being a retirement because of injury.

    IMO - people that can give Federer trouble on a regular basis are those that can work the point. Those that don't go for any more than they need to on a given shot. Those that grind him to death in one way or another.

    Henman is an agressive player - but he's not a pure serve volleyer like Rafter or Edberg in the sense that he doesn't come in off everything and anything. He sets up his volleys with whatever else he needs to - his serve or his groundstrokes.

    Hewitt and Nalby - well, this has been discussed before. They just don't let Fed blast through them - or at least they try to.

    Agassi - well, he's Agassi. The paragon of controlled agression, nowadays.

    Who else has Federer's number? Anyone?
     
    #16
  17. pound cat

    pound cat G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    13,741
    The one who holds the secret is Timmy, now leading Federer 7-1. Perhaps it's the mere thought of seeing more of Tim's feeble fist pumps and little hops that makes Federer just want to get off the court ASAP, in any way possible.
     
    #17
  18. dozu

    dozu Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    4,546
    SV by nature is a high-risk game. Look at Dent, when he is on, he is hard to stop, when his serve isn't working, he crashes like a cheap car.

    Yes, an SVer like Henman can give Fed trouble, as can any decent SVer, but to consistently outlast Fed in majors, that's another story.

    Regarding Agassi's return, it was NOT overrated IMO, the era has just passed his game. Fed clearly has MUCH MUCH better return, Safin and Hewitt returns better than Agassi also.

    New balls please.
     
    #18
  19. g14

    g14 Guest

    Tim, why talk yourself down like this? You have such a good record against Roger! But seriously thats the whole point. Those guys mentioned at the top were very very good attackers. In fact, thats why they are legends!
     
    #19
  20. gofederer

    gofederer Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    140
    simply tim and roger are mirror images to each other with the small difference that henman comes forward to the net more. federer seems to me to feel a sort of little brother complex and getting good results in next couple meetings between the two will be crucial for him to get over his last nemesis.
     
    #20
  21. polakosaur

    polakosaur Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    258
    fed can lose all he wants now but when the time comes in a grand slam or year end event he's gonna go out beat the living crap out of anyone on the court he's proved various times over that past year
     
    #21
  22. The Franchise

    The Franchise Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    101
    Well, I didn't see him go out and beat the living crap out of Nalbandian at the USO.
     
    #22
  23. spinbalz

    spinbalz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,676
    Federer was injured - he has just pulled out of his next tournament.
     
    #23
  24. PureCarlosMoyaDrive

    PureCarlosMoyaDrive Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,118
    Whoa spinz, any more details on this?
     
    #24
  25. Verbal_Kint

    Verbal_Kint Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    366
    #25
  26. spinbalz

    spinbalz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,676
    The foot injury came during the match against henmann.
     
    #26
  27. PureCarlosMoyaDrive

    PureCarlosMoyaDrive Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,118
    He'll be better of course by IW time right? Are they just nagging injuries like all the little ones Ferrero got at the AUS?
     
    #27
  28. Anonymous

    Anonymous Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    878
    I would hit a dropshot then a lob.
     
    #28
  29. Max G.

    Max G. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    4,356
    I would hit a winner.
     
    #29
  30. Classic

    Classic New User

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22
    O GOD!!!! Just because Federer, the "almighty god" loses his loyal little chimpy fans have to make an excuse for it.

    O no, he had an injury

    He had an off day

    He wasn't taking it seriously

    Whatever. He isn't perfect but this board talks about him like he is. If he was all his matches would be made up of nothing but golden sets.
     
    #30
  31. yee

    yee Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    268
    Every so called "loyal little chimpy fans" does that.

    Fatigue, injuries for Ferreror loses; bad serves day, back injuries for Andy losses; to dedicate whole attention to Davis cup for Hewitt missing in action last year...don't you realise that??? It's not just Federer.

    Yes he's not perfect and he still have many bad records vs lots of players, but he had played many amazing matches that had blown many fans away and left deep impression on lots.
     
    #31
  32. Verbal_Kint

    Verbal_Kint Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    366
    He DID pull out of his next tournament for a reason I think. I'm not saying he would have won against Henman, but it's just some extra info.

    Marnix
     
    #32
  33. BeHappy

    BeHappy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,789
    interesting in light of the STepanek match, went very like a Henman-Federer match, Federer STILL has no answer for perfectly executed S&V tennis
     
    #33
  34. HoVa

    HoVa Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Messages:
    296
    Only the powers of all three gods combined can beat federer.

    I call on the power of Triton! Zeus! and JEsus!
     
    #34
  35. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    Not really, he for the most part loses to the great defenders, very rarley (although more recently) have big servers and agressive attacking players troubled him during his dominance
     
    #35
  36. RestockingTues

    RestockingTues Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    771
    Location:
    Fremont, Ca
    Err, I believe when Roddick attacks the net, he makes himself look silly. Anyone remember the drinking game, "take a shot everytime Roddick approaches Xcourt and gets passed!" I'll be drunk off my ass by the end of the first set :p
     
    #36
  37. SempreSami

    SempreSami Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,627
    Location:
    UK
    Was he injured in this one as well? :roll:
     
    #37
  38. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    I agree and to go further only lefties with massive topspin give Fed consistent problems. ;)
     
    #38
  39. bangchu

    bangchu Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Messages:
    596
    A chump dig out a 4 year old thread to have another shot at bashing Federer. I am really amazed at how low these chumps can go.
     
    #39
  40. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    yeah for sure, there is that one guy.....
     
    #40
  41. thejackal

    thejackal Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,885
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    the match was decided in 2 tiebreaks. the law of averages suggest that fed will lost some sooner or later (like against roddick in miami). maybe the odds are in favor of the better player 60-40 in tiebreaks, but federer's record is a lot better than that as it is, so of course he will lose some at some point. there are almost no answers to perfect s/v due to logistics - much easier to hit a winner volley than a running passing shot.
     
    #41
  42. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    the law of averages only applies to independent events, tie breaks are not

    as for the volley, there is a perfect answer to the perfect serve and volley, its called the perfect return.....no chance for a volley there, just as the is no answer to the perfect serve and volley there is no answer to the perfect winner either, even considering the logistics of it, its a completely unreliable argument, there are so many other factors, actually the state of today's game suggests it is much harder to serve and volley than hit passing shot winners
     
    #42
  43. thejackal

    thejackal Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,885
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    in order to be a tiebreak the score has to be 6-6, which suggests that on that time of the day both players are at similar levels in terms of absolute effectiveness in their games.
     
    #43
  44. johnny ballgame

    johnny ballgame Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,230
    Eh? Fed has lost plenty of recent matches against more defensive type of players. Murray, Canas (twice), Nalbandian (twice), Nadal, Volandri, Ramirez Hidalgo (almost), etc. There is no specific type that works better over another against Fed. Whatever your type, you just have to come with your A+ game and hope Fed is off a little bit.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2008
    #44
  45. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,495
    Location:
    So Cal
    The flip side is the hysterical 'Fed is washed up' commentary from the other side. His year started off bad because of the mono and he's battling to regain his form. Nothing I've seen (barring more injuries) makes me think he won't remind everyone who is #1 once the grass and summer hard court seasons arrive.

    And your use of the word 'perfect' and the fact that Stepanek's ranking shows he doesn't play at that level too often... Nor would anyone who tried it against Fed. Look at Karlovic's record against him...

    I was thinking the same think. If Fed is off and someone is willing to grind out points, he can be had.

    And all this talk about S&V is just that, talk. There aren't a lot players who can magically switch to that style. As others have said, look what happens when Roddick tries it...



    http://www.angrybackhand.com
     
    #45
  46. flyer

    flyer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    2,065
    which means nothing because they are still not independent with from past tie breaks....the players have recolection of past tie breaks and maybe will base their strategy on that, may be confident due to past success, etc

    in order for the law of averages to apply the events have to be completely idependent of each other, because players have memory they are not, so the law of averages does not apply
     
    #46

Share This Page