grafselesfan
Banned
Roger has to win atleast 20 slams to be the greatest ever.
Yeah that is pretty sick. Your point? It's no limousine or something snobby like that.
Sampras was a giant ***** in many of his interviews. He had his moments were he referred to himself as superior to other tennis players. It is only fitting that federer can do the same.Buying an expensive car doesn't make you a snob but thinking your above other does which Federer has displayed many times.
It's the same Aston-Martin that James Bond drove in the past couple of movies. I heard that Rafa saw that movie and said - "I want that car!"Damn that's a nice car...
That is so cool! He probably paid for it up front. Must be nice being filthy rich.It's the same Aston-Martin that James Bond drove in the past couple of movies. I heard that Rafa saw that movie and said - "I want that car!"
Yeah, sure, and buying and driving around in a $250,000 Aston-Martin certainly doesn't give one a "snobby image", right? :roll:I didn't say Nadal doesn't buy expensive stuff. He just doesn't want that snobby image that Fed has.
Maybe he bought a dozen of them in every color they make with cash? I mean they're only a mere $250,000 a piece. That's pocket change for Rafa.That is so cool! He probably paid for it up front. Must be nice being filthy rich.
Um...maybe that's because he IS above others! How many others have won 14 Grand Slams, have a career Slam, and have 20 consecutive Slam semis and 16 of the last 17 Slam finals?Buying an expensive car doesn't make you a snob but thinking your above other does which Federer has displayed many times.
It's the same Aston-Martin that James Bond drove in the past couple of movies. I heard that Rafa saw that movie and said - "I want that car!"
Federer dresses up only for big formal events. If you look at him on normal days he is dressed in track jackets and Jeans made by Nike just like Rafa.Look at the clothes he is wearing just a simple tracksuit unlike the some of the stuff Federer wheres.
Buying an expensive car doesn't make you a snob but thinking your above other does which Federer has displayed many times.
Um...maybe that's because he IS above others! How many others have won 14 Grand Slams, have a career Slam, and have 20 consecutive Slam semis and 16 of the last 17 Slam finals?
Oh, yeah, NO ONE!!!!! So EVERYONE is below him, including YOU!
That doesnt make you above him in any way. You are a complete loser compared to him, no offense.I am above him I have had relationships with more attractive girls than he has.
That doesnt make you above him in any way. You are a complete loser compared to him, no offense.
Look at the clothes he is wearing just a simple tracksuit unlike the some of the stuff Federer wheres.
First of all, an Aston-Martin is FAR snobbier than a Rolex. For one thing, that car costs over $250,000 while a typical Rolex is around only $5,000. No comparison. How many people own Aston-Martins as compared to people who own a Rolex?It's no more or less snobby than a Rolex watch. I have no problem with Nadal driving an Aston Martin, but it's certainly no different than Federer liking a Rolex watch.
First of all, an Aston-Martin is FAR snobbier than a Rolex. For one thing, that car costs over $250,000 while a typical Rolex is around only $5,000. No comparison. How many people own Aston-Martins as compared to people who own a Rolex?
Second, Federer didn't buy his Rolex. He is sponsored by Rolex so they give him the watch for free so he can advertise it. He didn't pay a dime for it. In fact, he gets paid to wear it. Ever notice that he always puts on his watch right after a final and before the awards ceremony? That's because I'm sure it's in his contract to have to be wearing the watch when all the pictures of him are taken during the awards ceremony and when he's holding the trophy. BTW, Nadal does the same exact thing, so I'm sure he's sponsored by another watch company.
Only in your own distorted and pathetic little mind.I am above him I have had relationships with more attractive girls than he has.
First of all, an Aston-Martin is FAR snobbier than a Rolex. For one thing, that car costs over $250,000 while a typical Rolex is around only $5,000. No comparison. How many people own Aston-Martins as compared to people who own a Rolex?
Second, Federer didn't buy his Rolex. He is sponsored by Rolex so they give him the watch for free so he can advertise it. He didn't pay a dime for it. In fact, he gets paid to wear it. Ever notice that he always puts on his watch right after a final and before the awards ceremony? That's because I'm sure it's in his contract to have to be wearing the watch when all the pictures of him are taken during the awards ceremony and when he's holding the trophy. BTW, Nadal does the same exact thing, so I'm sure he's sponsored by another watch company.
Only in your own distorted and pathetic little mind.
You don't even have a measly $1 million dollars to bet. Federer has over $100 million to his name. Sorry, but he is WAY above you in EVERY way imaginable. Fame, fortune, career, tennis skills, achievements, fans, etc., etc.
Thanks for pointing out that Nadal is a lousy dresser and not GQ material. How very sad.Look at the clothes he is wearing just a simple tracksuit unlike the some of the stuff Federer wheres.
A surgeon would have way more than $1 million and wouldn't even have the time to make a single post on this board, let alone thousands.How do you know Im not a doctor or surgeon who saves peoples lives? Thats way above anything Federer does.
Federer is so far above you that you couldn't even see him if you had a Hubble telescope.Non taken but Federer is not above me.
And what makes you think that Federer doesn't find Mirka much more attractive than ANY girl you've ever dated?I am above him I have had relationships with more attractive girls than he has.
Federer is so far above you that you couldn't even see him if you had a Hubble telescope.
And what makes you think that Federer doesn't find Mirka much more attractive than ANY girl you've ever dated?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Compared to you, he's God. :shock:Federer is not a messiah.
Nobody finds Mirka attractive apart from Federer do you find her attractive?
In addition to being so far below Federer, thanks for also pointing out how shallow you are. :-?Nobody finds Mirka attractive apart from Federer do you find her attractive?
In addition to being so far below Federer, thanks for also pointing out how shallow you are. :-?
I think she looks good in some older pictures. Anyway, all that shows is that he isn't shallow. You talk about the "more attractive women you dated" as if they were trophies.
How can you date a women who you a woman who you don't find attractive?
By not being shallow.How can you date a women who you a woman who you don't find attractive?
How can you date a women who you a woman who you don't find attractive?
Cesc, I agree federer is not above you as a person. All people are equal. What i meant to say was in terms of accomplishments, fed is above you. Who knows, you could be a much nicer and better person than fed.Non taken but Federer is not above me.
Are all Federer fans racist idiots? Hopefully some his fanboys are no reflection on him. Or maybe so!
I wonder how many commercials Federer would have if his complexion was slightly more olive or tan. Guess we will never know.
I dare say Federer's relative dominance in the sport (even though a healthy Nadal is clearly #1) has brought out some hegemonic feelings among those of a certain persuasion. Old Europe's Great White Hope?
Though I must admit, the new Rolex commercial is hot. Quite impressive.
Nadal, Djoker and Murray have very attractive girlfriends you find them shallow?
Potito Starace.