To rest his knees, Nadal may not play Indian Wells...shocker?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by cluckcluck, Feb 17, 2013.

  1. cluckcluck

    cluckcluck Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,356
    Location:
    Between the baseline and netcord.
    #1
  2. Towser83

    Towser83 Legend

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    9,571
    makes more sense to play Miami if he does skip one of them I guess. Federer is not playing Miami, meaning Nadal would be 4th seed instead of 5. Imagine the crap he will get if he plays an exhibition match though? But it is only one match, not a whole tournament, and it would be a little warm up on HC, so maybe not a bad idea.
     
    #2
  3. Fearsome Forehand

    Fearsome Forehand Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,186
    Location:
    USA
    This is reminiscent of Muster. He avoided hard courts because they were so hard on his bad knee and racked up most of his points on clay.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2013
    #3
  4. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,936
    He should miss Miami as well, but he only has one free pass.
     
    #4
  5. mariecon

    mariecon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2013
    Messages:
    1,960
    Location:
    the Great White North
    He's only allowed to skip one Masters but he's already alluded to the fact that he might skip both so if he does, what kind of penalty will he face? I've never heard of a player actually being penalised for skipping a mandatory tournament without a valid excuse. It seems they say they're injured and that's all it takes.
     
    #5
  6. JSouza

    JSouza New User

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Messages:
    51
    As far as penalty for skipping one, or two in this case for Rafa, it just means that rather than 19 tournaments counting to your ranking, only 18 can. So if rafa played 19 tournaments this year for say 11500 points in total, then the win last week, as a non mandatory, may be the one that wouldnt count. so 11250 instead.
    is that right?
     
    #6
  7. Clay lover

    Clay lover Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,912
    Might as well skip IW and try to win Miami since he hasn't won there before.
     
    #7
  8. Clarky21

    Clarky21 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    12,686
    Good. The last thing he needs to do is grind his knees down even further running around on those slow as molasses hard courts.
     
    #8
  9. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,936
    I think if you claim illness or injury you still have to turn up to the event for the promotional activity and then you go home???
     
    #9
  10. Say Chi Sin Lo

    Say Chi Sin Lo Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    9,265
    Moo-point until we're actually at the event. We all know he's going to flip flop like 20x before committing to a decision.
     
    #10
  11. Murrayfan31

    Murrayfan31 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,056
    To rest his knees, he should avoid those slippery surfaces. Like in Brazil. lol
     
    #11
  12. Tony48

    Tony48 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2008
    Messages:
    6,899
    He already skipped a slam. Might as well go all out.
     
    #12
  13. Tennis_Hands

    Tennis_Hands Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,212
    Location:
    Inside the service box - the business end
    Multiple facepalm.
     
    #13
  14. sdont

    sdont Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    7,035
    Location:
    Paris, France
    "He is also scheduled to play a one-day exhibition on hardcourts at Madison Square Garden just before heading to California."

    An exhibition match on hardcourt?

    Strange move by Nadal.
     
    #14
  15. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    Rightly so. He is only just starting to feel comfortable on the tennis court. It would be a mistake, medically speaking, to expose it to hardcourts so soon after returning. He's not doing anything questionable by skipping the hardcourt events.
     
    #15
  16. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    This was scheduled a long time ago, at a time when he expected to play the Australian Open. Not sure what you mean by strange. He can always back out. But if he does play, its not like he has to do much running. These events are always very light-hearted hit-and-miss deals.
     
    #16
  17. Rogael Naderer

    Rogael Naderer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    472
    Exhibition match = Light practice session, with less intense movement.
     
    #17
  18. Fearsome Forehand

    Fearsome Forehand Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,186
    Location:
    USA
    He could do what many do, what Sampras did at times, show up and lose in the first or second round, then go home early and rest for the majors.
     
    #18
  19. spperry

    spperry Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    103
    If his knee still hurts he won't want to play too many hardcourt events due to the stress they will put on it.

    I am a big Rafa fan but I worry a bit about the knee talk for months to come. He has just come back so it will be a focus at the moment but I wouldn't like to be going into RG with the talk still about his knee.

    Hopefully he has turned a corner and will get back to his best over the coming months but if not it will be unfair to always focus on his knee problems if he loses.
     
    #19
  20. underground

    underground Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2012
    Messages:
    6,987
    Until Nadal actually plays on hard courts, or face against the top players on clay, his 'amazing' 'the impossible' comeback as *******s suggest still needs a huge asterisk next to it.
     
    #20
  21. Crisstti

    Crisstti Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    7,269
    Location:
    Chile
    Obviously not a shocker at all, and it might be a good idea to skip both tournaments.

    It is a pity though to skip a tournament he always does so well at (IW)... I would prefer him to skip Miami in that sense, but I guess it makes more sense skipping the former.
     
    #21
  22. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    But the only tournament that matters is Roland Garros. The other slams are almost irrelevant. It is a mere bonus if Nadal wins the others. Roland Garros is all that matters. And Roland Garros is Djokovic's top priority too. And by the way, if Nadal's parents didn't split up in 2009, Federer would also deem Roland Garros as the top priority. Its all about Roland Garros. In other words, hardcourts are meaningless.
     
    #22
  23. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,936
    If Nadal only wins RG, and clay events in general, his CV will become sorely lacking.
     
    #23
  24. McLovin

    McLovin Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,250
    Bingo! Agassi was also famous for that.

    However, he can't 'tank' as they'll fine him for that. So he would have to go out and put on a good show, but just not play smart.
     
    #24
  25. Tennis_Hands

    Tennis_Hands Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,212
    Location:
    Inside the service box - the business end
    Or, he can start losing matches, because he is getting old, and, as he loses speed, more and more players will be able to beat him.
     
    #25
  26. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,600
    I thought Rafa's excuse for losing to Soderling was his knees?
     
    #26
  27. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    31,109
    Location:
    New York
    No, it won't. He's still won the 4 slams, something that very few players have achieved. And winning slams for 9 consecutive years would be a unique record.
     
    #27
  28. tennisaddict

    tennisaddict G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    15,135
    If at all he wins FO and sucks at others, even if he gets up to 15 majors, it will be a huge gap with respect to Fed, who has such a diverse beautiful resume. But he can be at the level of Sampras.
     
    #28
  29. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    Nadal is the only man in world history to win slams on clay, grass and hardcourt in a Calendar Year. It is the most difficult feat a player has ever achieved in a Calendar Year. Also, Nadal has dominated one slam event more than any man has ever dominated a slam event, and that slam event is Roland Garros - Nadal has won it 7 times from 8 attempts. To give you an idea of how special that is, Federer needed 14 attempts to win 7 Wimbledons. Additionally, Nadal is currently tied for the most Masters Shields Titles, and is also tied for the most consecutive slam-winning years. He can take both of those outright. Also, Nadal has spent 102 weeks with the number one ranking, just for good measure, and has finished the year ranked number one in 2008 and 2010. Nadal has won 81 straight matches on clay, the single-surface record. Yet you call all this "a CV sorely lacking" :lol:
     
    #29
  30. RAFA2005RG

    RAFA2005RG Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,250
    Federer is not the king of any of the slams. None. The Australian Open leadership is shared by Agassi, Djokovic and Federer. Roland Garros is owned by Nadal, outright. Wimbledon is shared by Sampras and Federer. US Open is shared by several. The only GOAT of a slam event is Nadal. The others are shared. That's a big hole in Federer's CV, the fact he doesn't own a slam event. Also, Nadal has won at least 2 slams on clay, grass and hardcourt. Federer hasn't. Another big hole in the Federer CV. Federer almost doesn't even have the Career Grand Slam. Nadal gifted him that in 2009, as we know Federer would never have beaten Nadal at Roland Garros.
     
    #30
  31. sillymonkey

    sillymonkey Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,683
    Location:
    California
    Change the thread title to "wild speculation".
     
    #31
  32. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,936
    I said that if Nadal is now only going to excel on clay that 'his CV will become sorely lacking", so you've just invented a quotation from me that is entirely false.

    Bizarre!



     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2013
    #32
  33. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12,936
    The other way of looking at this is that Nadal is a brilliant clay courter who couldn't achieve the same level on other surfaces in slams.

    Borg's six FOs and five Ws is better than seven FOs and two Ws.



     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2013
    #33
  34. Mainad

    Mainad G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    13,714
    Location:
    Manchester, UK.
    He already has 2 IW titles (2007 & 2009) so he may be thinking that if he has to skip one of them it may as well be the one he has already won twice and play the one he is yet to win ie. Miami (3 losing finals in 2005, 2008 & 2011).
     
    #34
  35. OddJack

    OddJack Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    9,663
    Location:
    South
    The real Question is...

    If you dont have knees to play a master on hard court, do you have enough to win a major on Clay?
     
    #35
  36. Relinquis

    Relinquis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    4,335
    Location:
    On the courts; hard & clay ...
    clay is much less stressful on the knees...
     
    #36
  37. OddJack

    OddJack Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    9,663
    Location:
    South
    That does not answer the question. You still have to have knees.
     
    #37
  38. Mainad

    Mainad G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    13,714
    Location:
    Manchester, UK.
    That's an odd way of putting it. Currently, Federer is the king of 2 of the Slams ( Wimbledon 7 titles & USO 5 titles) and joint king of one other (AO 4 titles). No other active player can match him in that regard. That makes him the present day king of three quarters of the Slams. Of the other multi-Slam winners, Nadal is only king of one (RG) while Djokovic is only joint-king of one (AO)!

    Well, Nadal wasn't good enough to get past Soderling that year and Soderling was comfortably taken out by Federer in the final so if Soderling had choked away his match with Nadal (lesser players have been known to do that) and Nadal had struggled through to the final, he may not have had enough in the tank to beat Federer on that occasion. Soderling may actually have done Nadal a favour that year and inadvertently helped him preserve his unbroken record in RG finals!
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2013
    #38
  39. OddJack

    OddJack Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    9,663
    Location:
    South
    Interesting,

    For Nadal's fans now there is more to look into in the past than there is in the future.
     
    #39
  40. Hitman

    Hitman G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    12,202
    RAFA2005RG banned? shocker!!!!
     
    #40
  41. citybert

    citybert Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2011
    Messages:
    990
    He could easily still rack up 4K points on clay alone. Add another 1K on other surfaces and that is enough to be in the top 8 for wtf and a better season than most.
     
    #41
  42. Tropikal_Knights

    Tropikal_Knights Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Messages:
    188
    Now this is a new one......trying to define who is the GOAT of various slams......Mildly amusing if it was not so silly.....

    Anyways as for Nadal how is it a shocker when he is on record recently saying that hard courts are a killer for his knees?

    As for the various surfaces....I think there is no argument......

    The only reason is the favorable matchup of nadals vs fed otherwise he would not have a winning record against him nor won a couple of slam finals against him such as the aussie open and wimby.....

    Basically he would have retired with like one wimby, no aussie opens and like 12 french opens.......history will regard him as the ultimate competitor, battle hardened with a never say die attitude.

    the only problem for him and the fall of him was the rise of another slugger who had the same attributes only tenfold more in Lance.
     
    #42
  43. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,727
    I would not have purchased tickets and booked a room if I had known this.
     
    #43
  44. Say Chi Sin Lo

    Say Chi Sin Lo Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    9,265
    Tweet him for a refund.
     
    #44
  45. Goosehead

    Goosehead Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,597
    Location:
    A bloke in Brighton, England.
    it was always a big chance he wouldnt play indian wells on HC..playing 3 tourneys in 4 weeks after 7months off is plenty..he needs to give his body a rest.
     
    #45
  46. Antonio Puente

    Antonio Puente Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,205
    Location:
    Buenavista
    Here's yet another way of looking at it: The guy has won everything. He has a Career Golden Slam. Nadal is only one of two players, I believe, with at least two slams on all three surfaces. I would say that is well-rounded enough. Nadal is so dominant on clay that people forget these things. In an odd way, by some(mainly Americans with their anti-clay mentality), he is penalized for his dominance.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2013
    #46
  47. Nathaniel_Near

    Nathaniel_Near Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    20,039
    Location:
    Relax folks, ...
    World history, man, I love it. World history...
     
    #47
  48. cluckcluck

    cluckcluck Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,356
    Location:
    Between the baseline and netcord.
    Considering he wins all tournaments he enters. He's also got points to defend from 2012. So adding new points might not be as easy as one thinks.
     
    #48
  49. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,115
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    Winning the career Grand Slam is not enough?

    Okay, but he's still won 2 Wimbledons, an Australian Open, a US Open, 2 Canadian Opens, 2 Indian Wells, and a Madrid Indoor. And his dominance on clay is extraordinary, with 7 French Opens, 8 Monte Carlos, 6 Italian Opens, a Hamburg, a Madrid, many other clay-court titles etc. He also has an Olympic gold medal, and 3 Davis Cup triumphs (4 if you count 2008, when he missed the final).

    Yes, but the one negative with Borg's career is no US Open title.
     
    #49
  50. ledwix

    ledwix Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    3,129
    Nadal would effectively be protesting hard courts if he skips both events. Coming back and playing three clay mug events and skipping two mandatory hard masters the next month would show where his priorities are.
     
    #50

Share This Page