toughest grand slam to win?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by arodnadal, Jul 24, 2006.

?

Toughest grand slam to win

  1. Aussie Open

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. French Open

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Wimbledon

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. US Open

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. arodnadal

    arodnadal Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    541
    what do you think is the touhest grand slam to win?
     
    #1
  2. baseliner

    baseliner Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,162
    For Federer and Sampras the French Open.
     
    #2
  3. Duzza

    Duzza Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Messages:
    6,315
    Location:
    Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    French I'd say. So many nobody claycourters could knock you out.
     
    #3
  4. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Definitely French open. You need to be both physically and mentally fit to win the Frech open.
     
    #4
  5. Alexandros

    Alexandros Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,400
    Wimbledon, far and away. Looking back over the years, you can see that typically speaking only the truly great players have been particularly successful there. I look at the French as the opposite - yes it takes a certain amount of physical stamina and ability to win, but too many one hit wonders have won the French and not much else.
     
    #5
  6. FiveO

    FiveO Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,260
    Historically, (and before the excessive slowing of conditions tour wide), for the traditional medium/fast courters (offensive baseliners, all-courters, big serve big fh'ers, serve and volleyers, etc.) RG had always been the toughest.

    For the heavy topspin, defensive baseliners? Everything else.
     
    #6
  7. tennisaddict07

    tennisaddict07 New User

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    30
    I would have to say Wimbledon is the toughest because not many players know how to adapt to playing on the grass. They find it hard to volley and come to the net because everyone seems to think that they can win from behind the baseline.
     
    #7
  8. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Is this another poll showing how many Fed and Nadal fans are there ? Aussie and US open are in the poll too, you know. o_O
     
    #8
  9. Big Fed

    Big Fed Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    593
    Location:
    Lansing, Michigan
    I say Wimbledon because the grass court season isnt that long so players do have a lot of time to ajust to the new court surface.
     
    #9
  10. zhan

    zhan Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,005
    i think Wimbledon is the toughest for the rest of the field... just because Federer defends his house with dignity...
    For Federer the toughest to win is the French
     
    #10
  11. clayman2000

    clayman2000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,849
    well id go for the french first ...then wimby...this is because most of the grass court/hard court players come into the french and get beaten by the likes of almagro,coria and gaudio....while vice verca for wimby...the diff is that majority of the players on tour have harc court /grass court games
     
    #11
  12. Tennis_Goodness

    Tennis_Goodness Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    423
    Wimbeldeon is the toughest to win simply because thats the tournament where all the greats of the game have tried to win. It's the supebowl of tennis.

    If the French Open was as meaningful as Wimbeldon then I think Sampras would have had 7 French Opens instead of 7 Wimby's. He would have had the game to win on clay, but since Wimbeldon was the big one, he suited his game for that very purpose.

    I think the tour knows that to win Wimbeldon you have to beat a VERY good player, the French Open is more of a duck shoot, you never know what could happend.
     
    #12
  13. clayman2000

    clayman2000 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,849
    i have a question to ask u...r u retarded...samprass couldnt have jsut changed his game if he wanted to...his game was suited for grass...not clay..for example...i have a very good clay court game because i am fast and can get the ball back in play...however i cant say i want to play good on grass
     
    #13
  14. Arafel

    Arafel Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,155
    Well, Sampras as a junior had a game more suited for clay. So for that matter did McEnroe. Both played more defensive tennis as juniors. Sampras had a two handed backhand. Both were baseliners. McEnroe didn't start to play attacking serve/volley tennis until he was 17.

    Both Sampras and McEnroe, the two greatest grass court players of the last 30 years, changed their game from a clay game to an attacking game because they valued Wimbledon over the other Grand Slams. And the game necessary to win at Wimbledon translated very well to the fast courts of the US Open, and in McEnroe's time to the grass of Australia.
     
    #14
  15. Tennis_Goodness

    Tennis_Goodness Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    423
    Pete was one of the greatest players to play the game and he formed his game to do well on grass and hardcourts. If the greats grew up thinking the French Open was the best tournament then the greats would have made there success on clay not grass. They didn't though and they all went after Wimbeldon because it means the most and has the most prestiege!
     
    #15
  16. theace21

    theace21 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,263
    Well said.

    For Borg it was the US Open, but for so many other the French is the most difficult.
     
    #16
  17. Tennis_Goodness

    Tennis_Goodness Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    423
    For the majority of players throughout history, Wimbeldon has been the toughest!

    For the elite and best players, the French Open has been the toughest.

    Overall, you have to go with Wimbeldon just because that's where the greats went to excel! The French Open is tough but the caliber of players are not the same. It gives people with maybe a little less skill on a more equal playing field. Where as Wimbeldon if you don't have a certain tool, there's really no chance for you because of the caliber of players in that tournament and the way the courts and surface play!
     
    #17
  18. TacoBellBorderBowl1946

    TacoBellBorderBowl1946 Professional

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    Wimbledon, you just need to be a grinder to win the French
     
    #18
  19. Supernatural_Serve

    Supernatural_Serve Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,348
    Mentally: Wimbledon
    Physically: French
    Emotionally: US Open
     
    #19
  20. Nadal-inator

    Nadal-inator New User

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    31
    It is hard for most players to play on clay if they usually play on hard courts. Transitioning is the hardest part because the ball barely bounces on certain shots plus they have to learn to slide into shots and american tennis is lacking on clay courts.
     
    #20
  21. Condoleezza

    Condoleezza Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,418

    None of them is tougher than the other.
    You have to win 7 matches in all of them, be better than 127 players.

    Of course the weather or the surface or some other circumstances can be tougher in one slam compared to other. But your opponents have to cope with those circumstances as well. So that evens it out.

    AO *might* be a little bit easier because sometimes not all the top players show up.

    Condi
     
    #21
  22. Condoleezza

    Condoleezza Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,418

    The truly great players had some difficulties to win the French, yes?

    So obviously the French Open is the toughest ....

    Condi
     
    #22
  23. flymeng

    flymeng Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    430
    Location:
    Mount Everest
    The French Open. It tests your stamina and endurance.
     
    #23
  24. Marat Safinator

    Marat Safinator Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    765
    depends what your most suited towards.
     
    #24
  25. siber222000

    siber222000 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    648
    definitely french open.. since its clay random things can happen
     
    #25
  26. wimble10

    wimble10 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    590
    They're all tough. I like the US Open and French Open. US Open because it's the USO and hot, end of year GS. French because clay courters rule there.
     
    #26
  27. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
     
    #27
  28. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    I'll have to say the French Open. Its a surface where you have to at your peak in physical ability and fitness compared to other surfaces. Wimbledon on the other hand all you need is a big serve and you could pull off a few matches with that weapon alone.
     
    #28
  29. The ball was in

    The ball was in Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    419
    They are all as tough as each other....there is no one specific grand slam that is harder than another...there are so many factors involved that make each one difficult.
    For the Aussie open, the heat is a huge factor so if you didn't do too much conditioning work in the off season then you will suffer.

    French, again, fitness plays a bug part as matches can go on forever. As does solid ground strokes from the back of the court.

    Wimbledon, yes, a big serve is great but returns are also a big factor in winning....as if you can't return and are holding your service games easily....not going to win!! Will be one hell of a long match!! Also, players have to contend with 'strange' bounces :D

    US open, again, fitness plays a part as the humidity can be very draining.

    Luck plays a big part in any Grand Slam win...just thought i'd throw that comment in for good measure!!
     
    #29
  30. Hewitt rulez

    Hewitt rulez Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    638
    I voted Wimbledon just because Federer is so dominant on grass. I guess you could say the same for Nadal at the French.
     
    #30
  31. BeautyVenus

    BeautyVenus New User

    Joined:
    May 13, 2006
    Messages:
    95
    The French Open is the toughest. You cannot overpower your opponent. You have to use your mind, be in excellent shape and have mental toughness. And you need to know how to slide into shots.
     
    #31
  32. typingchamp

    typingchamp Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    103
    I say French Open. There are soooooooo many players that are specialized to play on clay and nothing else that someone outside of that circle has a very hard time winning.

    There are far fewer players who specialize for grass so Wimbledon is more wide open to make a run. Also on grass you can have very limited game with holes that can be covered up with a huge serve.

    I think Aussie Open is tough too because it is the start of the year and the heat is ridiculous. Remember that final with Hingis and Capriati? Man . . . looked like Hingis was gonna have a stroke . . . and I know Hingis isn't the most fit player ever but still, she was world number one so her fitness was not awful.

    Special mention should also be made for US Open too. In fact, I may change my mind and say US Open for the simple fact that both clay courters and grass courters transition fairly well to hardcourt of US Open. It is also prestigious tournament and with that many top contenders around, it is very difficult to win. At Wimbledon there are top players who suffer on grass, at French there are players who suffer on clay, but at US Open, basically the entire top 50 can play well.
     
    #32
  33. Bogie

    Bogie Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,842
    the french should be the obvious choice here. most players in europe, south america, and most of asia grew up on clay and that's their natural surface. there are just so many more outstanding natural clay-courters than there are hard court players, and it makes it that much harder wih every round of the french.
     
    #33
  34. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    New York City
    This thread makes no sense. For clay courter specialists, the French is their only hope, for big servers/hitters, a more distant one.

    What matters is who you have to play in the slam. Wimbledon is the hardest because Federer is the most difficult to dethrone.

    Wimbledon is the only correct answer here. Federer has won 4 in a row, therefore it's the hardest for anyone else to come in and win.
     
    #34

Share This Page