I know that tournaments can be easily rated in hierarchy by point value. But in terms of their importance and prestige - would people agree to this ranking for Tournaments in terms of importance? (I have put the tournaments current ATP points value in brackets in terms of current point ranking value): 1/ Wimbledon (1st equal in points) 2/ French Open/US Open tie for second place (1st equal in points) 4/ Australian Open (1st equal in points) 5/ WTF (5th in points) 6/ Olympics (15th in points) 7th equal/ 9 Masters 1000 titles (6th equal in points) So even though the Olympics is the number 15 tournament in points - people tend to rate it over Masters 1000's so - should it now be elevated in points to around 1250 points instead of 750 points? Note: It should never be as many points as the WTF because a/ WTF is a much deeper field b/ WTF has a much longer tradition as the most important tournament outside of the slams. We could argue forever on what should be rated as the number 2 tournament. Suffice to say there is probably a North America/European split over it being the US Open or Roland Garros. Probably best to rate them 2nd equal.