True talent beats all!

Discussion in 'College Tennis Talk' started by TB45, Jul 31, 2008.

  1. TB45

    TB45 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    131
    During my stay at an Adidas Tennis Camp in Madison, WI...we had a guest speaker (the Head Women's Coach of the Badgers) come talk to us about college and recruiting. In his 15 minute or so speech he stated that all college coaches would like someone who is a hard worker and gives 100% all the time but he also said that coaches would never deny true talent.

    College Coaches will never deny true talent on their team because their job could be at stake and because they always believe that they can change someone (say a guy with all talent and no work ethic). They believe in 2nd chances.

    I dont think he ever clearly state which he would prefer but i think he was leaning towards... Talent > Hardwork


    Anyone agree or disagree?
     
    #1
  2. mendozer

    mendozer New User

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Messages:
    9
    talent is more important
     
    #2
  3. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491
    Of course talent is important, if not the most important, aspect in recruiting- if you are at school that puts a premium on winning. Why do you think most of the big time D1 football and bball programs are filled with questionable characters and poor academic students, but guys that are top-rated at their position. There are some schools though in D3, NAIA and others that aren't all about winning at the coaches job is not at stake if he loses. He is the type that can afford to get high character and good students at the expense of talent.
     
    #3
  4. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    No way. Hard work is more important. Talent alone means squat!
     
    #4
  5. hkem1

    hkem1 New User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    16
    Location:
    Seaside FL/ Austin TX
    Hard work beats talent only when talent fails to work hard
     
    #5
  6. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491
    So only if you worked harder as a kid you could have been in the NBA or top 100 ATP? You lazy bum!:)
     
    #6
  7. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    So only with your talent, you could be an ATP Top100 after playing tennis for 5 years? You lazy bum! :)
     
    #7
  8. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491
    I have no tennis talent, only the heart of a lion and the indomitable will to get a few beers after a match:)
     
    #8
  9. Gemini

    Gemini Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,577
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Talent is important but it means nothing without results. That's what he didn't tell you.
     
    #9
  10. SlapShot

    SlapShot Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,423
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Great quote.

    You really have to have both, but there are people who are simply more atheletic genetically. That's like the old saying - you can't teach "fast"/"tall".
     
    #10
  11. Babb

    Babb Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,447
    Location:
    Now down to 4 feet behind the baseline.
    Hard work is the only way...
     
    #11
  12. itsstephenyo

    itsstephenyo Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Messages:
    341
    No way. Talent definitely has to play a part in it.

    When I was in band, I never practiced but was always first chair. A friend of mine put in 3-4 hours a day and just never improved and always sat close to last chair. He was the hardest working kid I've ever known. It's just that the talent and skill wasn't there. No matter how much he practiced, he didn't get better. And this was 4 years worth of practicing hours a day.
     
    #12
  13. 35ft6

    35ft6 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,557
    Not even sure how a coach would really know what a player's work ethic is like BEFORE they're on their team but okay.,,
     
    #13
  14. atatu

    atatu Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    3,327
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Yeah, but we're talking tennis here, not band.....
     
    #14
  15. SlapShot

    SlapShot Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,423
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Similar situation, though. There's something to be said for having a "knack" for something - be it athletics, music, academics, etc. A lot of it is based in how quickly your body creates the neural paths for muscle memory, combined in athletics with the proper genetics/build.

    If you think that someone who is a professional athlete is simply someone who worked harder than everyone else without having the pure physical talent to perform at that level, I think that you're sadly mistaken.
     
    #15
  16. Babb

    Babb Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,447
    Location:
    Now down to 4 feet behind the baseline.
    Band stories, eh?

    I practiced my butt off and marched snare my freshmen year...

    No substitute for hard work. There were much better musicians than me who did not do as well because they had not put in the time to improve their hands.
     
    #16
  17. slice bh compliment

    slice bh compliment G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,026
    This one time?
    At band camp?


    [not sure why, but, i never get tired of that]
     
    #17
  18. SlapShot

    SlapShot Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,423
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    I don't think that anyone is arguing that there isn't a place for hard work, but the fact of the matter is, someone who is a truly talented athelete that puts in the work is going to come out ahead of someone who may not be as gifted but puts in more time practicing.
     
    #18
  19. Serve_Ace

    Serve_Ace Professional

    Joined:
    May 10, 2008
    Messages:
    992
    Location:
    State College
    The best is a lot of talent mixed with hard work
     
    #19
  20. atatu

    atatu Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    3,327
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    That's not what I said. My point is that tennis is a bit more physical than "band" so the talented musician (that would be you) might be able to slack a bit more than his hapless band mate who practices every day. In tennis, you could be very talented, but if you don't work hard, it will catch up to you. If Roger Federer doesn't practice for a year, he'll lose to Andy Roddick.
     
    #20
  21. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491
    yah but he wouldn't lose to a journeyman futures player that is working twice as hard as him.
     
    #21
  22. AndrewD

    AndrewD Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,581
    People need to understand that work ethic and discipline are talents. People will try to get by without them but, in the long-run, they won't succeed.

    Also, it's not a talent if you didn't work to acquire it. So, those who are athletically more capable due simply to a win in the genetic lottery are more 'gifted' but not more talented. It's only talent when you do something with it.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2008
    #22
  23. atatu

    atatu Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    3,327
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    He could, depends on the player, someone like Devarman ?
     
    #23
  24. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491
    I don't consider Devarman a journeyman since he just started playing pro tennis! He obviously has top 50-100 potential. A career futures player in the 300-700 range is what I am talking about.
     
    #24
  25. TB45

    TB45 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    131

    To add to this, a talented player with little work ethic can always be changed with pressure from a coach. "If you dont give 100%, you wont be here next year." I'm sure that'll make them think twice about slacking.

    Hardworkers are always wanted but i think hard work will only take you so far. The pros train 6 or so hours a day and they're at (or near) their peak. IMO, most of us reach our peak in high school or college...so we'll be working harder than everyone else but we wont be improving much.

    I should've made a poll about this...oh well. I say Talent > Hardwork
     
    #25
  26. daddy

    daddy Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,686
    Location:
    Moon Balls

    This is talent vs complete lack of it. What about talent vs average talent + hard work ?
     
    #26
  27. federer envies me

    federer envies me Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2007
    Messages:
    632
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    hard work is waaaaay more important
     
    #27
  28. verdasco

    verdasco New User

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    USA
    you really need both to be a great champion.

    But if I was a coach and I had to choose one or the other for a student, I would choose talent. Discipline and Hard work can be taught.
     
    #28
  29. TB45

    TB45 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    131

    Exactly! i think this is what the coach was implying!
     
    #29
  30. Nanshiki

    Nanshiki Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,285
    Anyone can work hard and become decent, or even very good at anything, but in sports (and most things), talent is what separates amateurs from professionals.

    When's the last time you heard of a pro who didn't have that much talent for the game, but worked his ass off to get where he was? Maybe 80 years ago with Rene Lacoste (who started playing at 16 or so)?

    Look at Karlovic...would he have that serve if he wasn't 6'10"? Not likely.
     
    #30
  31. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,672
    Talent is more important than hard work. Although you need to have both at the top level of just about any field of work.
     
    #31
  32. NickC

    NickC Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,436
    Location:
    East Coast, USA. Formally Tucson, AZ
    A recent conversation with the assist. Pro at my club, who is a D-I coach:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A: Mike, what is your stance on talent at the college level?
    B: You get in on rankings and talent.
    A: But what about hard work, where does that factor in?
    B: You may get in on talent, but you don't stay on talent. If you think you can make it on talent alone, you'll get laughed off the courts, and out of the school. Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Take it as you will.
     
    #32
  33. ttbrowne

    ttbrowne Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,618
    If someone has talent AND puts in some hard work, they're gonna beat the less talented, harder worker 99% of the time.

    You can't teach someone to have raw talent. Just like you can't teach speed.
     
    #33
  34. Teamtomo

    Teamtomo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    765
    Location:
    London, UK
    talent is nothing without hard work
     
    #34
  35. ClarkC

    ClarkC Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,764
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    I know of a blue chip recruit at a major Division I team who did not try very hard in practice but turned it on in matches. The coach explained numerous times that players who do not try hard enough in practice are not helping their teammates improve, and this is part of being on the team. Soon, that player was not asked to come back for the next year, even though he had been in the top 6. He had to transfer.
     
    #35

Share This Page