TW Review: Prince EXO3 Rebel 98

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by TW Staff, Feb 13, 2012.

  1. TW Staff

    TW Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    24,313
    Location:
    Tennis-Warehouse.com
    #1
  2. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,238
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    sweet! thanks for postin!
     
    #2
  3. syke

    syke Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,356
    The new rebel looks really good... The swirly pj is gone finally...
     
    #3
  4. subz

    subz Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Messages:
    366
    Finally =)

    Thank you !
     
    #4
  5. subz

    subz Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Messages:
    366
    There is an error in the review in the Groundstrokes Section Mark says the pattern is 18 x 20.

    Its 16 x 20.
     
    #5
  6. syke

    syke Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,356
    Really interesting that Prince is back to string hole on the sides and port on the head. Guess they have been listening...
     
    #6
  7. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    The Rebel 98 has O ports on the sides.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2012
    #7
  8. tennisxlsdk

    tennisxlsdk Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    118
    Are string grommets available for purchase to replace the port grommets for sides and top/bottom for the Rebel 98 similar to the exo3 Tour?
     
    #8
  9. themitchmann

    themitchmann Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,619
    As far as I know, yes. I just got some for my Rebel 95s.
     
    #9
  10. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    where did you get them from?
     
    #10
  11. themitchmann

    themitchmann Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,619
    Directly from Prince (I'm a sponsored teaching pro).
     
    #11
  12. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    When u get a chance, can u find out if they have the same hole grommet inserts for the 98? thanks
     
    #12
  13. themitchmann

    themitchmann Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,619
    I'm 99% sure they will, but I'll send an email. Might be faster to ask in the TW Questions section.
     
    #13
  14. Dgdavid

    Dgdavid Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,000
    Location:
    Surrey, England
    The review mentions it is similar to the Wilson Blade BLX 98. Has anyone played with both? I am thinking of getting one of these or the Rebel 98.
     
    #14
  15. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    Personally I don't find it similar to the Blade at all. Much lighter and whippier. The Blade is also much stiffer feeling and heavier swingweight. Also, they both have different string patterns. I find the Rebel 98 similar to the Head Speed 300 and the Pacific XForce.
     
    #15
  16. dParis

    dParis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,688
    Preferred the Rebel 98. I found better control, spin, volleys and comfort with the Rebel 98. I feel BBlade is more powerful. Another important difference is the balance/weight distribution between the two frames. I'm not going to say one is "better" than the other but there is a difference and you will prefer one over the other.
    Between the XForce and the Rebel 98, can you say one is more powerful than the other?
     
    #16
  17. Dgdavid

    Dgdavid Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,000
    Location:
    Surrey, England
    Thanks guys.
     
    #17
  18. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    They both have a medium amount of power....about the same. But you need to swing each stick pretty fast to get depth.
     
    #18
  19. dParis

    dParis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,688
    The XForce Pro is a little bit out of your spec range, I believe, but have you had a chance to ever hit with it?
     
    #19
  20. YesTennis

    YesTennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    639
    Jack, just had one additional question. Since people are asking for comparisons of the Rebel 98 to other racquets, just wondering your thoughts in relation to the Prestige S and the Yonex V Core 98? Thanks.
     
    #20
  21. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    Never said the Pro. The regular XForce.
     
    #21
  22. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    More powerful than the Prestige S by a significant margin. Lighter through the air and also less stiff.

    The VCore is the most stiff feeling out of these 3 by far. Little more power than the Rebel98.

    stiffness: Most is Vcore, then Prestige S, then Rebel98
    power: Vcore, then Rebel, then Prestige S
    swingweight: most is Prestige S, then Rebel and Vcore very close
    ease of playability: first VCore, then Rebel, then Prestige S
     
    #22
  23. dParis

    dParis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,688
    If you read my post again, you'll see I never assumed you hit with the Pro. Just asking if you had. Thanks for the input, though.

    Regarding some of these comparisons, I'm a little sceptical, or surprised that among racquets with the same size head, the stiffer one with a higher static weight and higher swing weight would be significantly lower powered than the lighter, more flexible one.
     
    #23
  24. YesTennis

    YesTennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    639
    Jack- thanks for your detailed response. Much appreciated.
     
    #24
  25. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    The Prestige S is very low powered. All the TW reviewers made comments about the lack of power in their shots.. If you are skeptical, try it yourself. Of course these are all my personal opinions and what may be powerful to you, may not be to me.
     
    #25
  26. dParis

    dParis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,688
    The listed swingweight for the Prestige S is only 315 while the Rebel is 325. I was considering your rankings and assumed the S had a higher SW, so that will something to do with the perceived power levels . If the head of the S is measured in the same method as the other Prestige's, it is closer to 95" rather than the Rebel's 98" so that may further explain the Rebel's higher power.

    From the reviews and feedback, I wouldn't expect anything spectacular from the Pres. S, but I'm still curious to try it.
     
    #26
  27. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    You should know by now u cant go exactly by TW's swingweights. The Rebel is listed as 325, but FEELS much lighter...like around 310. The Prestige S is 315, but feels around 325.
     
    #27
  28. dParis

    dParis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,688
    If that is indeed the case, and I'm not saying it isn't, then I'd like to know which factors make the Rebel 98 so much more powerful than the PresS. I'm not trying to dispute what you said - I haven't tried the S yet - I suppose I'm speaking to the more general discussion of what makes a racquet powerful.
     
    #28
  29. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    The Rebel 98 isn't THAT much more powerful than the S, but it is rather noticeable and the TW reviews confirm this. They mention the low power of the S and also mention the good power of the 98. Power is mostly due to beam width and stiffness of the frame and the mass behind the ball, but it also is effected by the materials that make up the frame. But these are just generalizations. Look at the London...thin beam, flexible...and yet very powerful. The frames materials dictate how much energy is absorbed and then transfered back into the ball. There is something about the Rebel's frame that makes it more lively. The S seems to absorb more of the incoming ball's pace.
    Again, the power difference is incremental and is probably not as much as you are thinking. Jason from TW who plays the London said in one thread that the stock Rebel 98 was more powerful than the stock London. I don't quite agree with that, but he probably has a faster swingspeed than I do.
     
    #29
  30. tom4ny

    tom4ny Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    i have a stealth reb 98 and it is not that powerful. haven't tried the prestige s but knowing the prestige line, a prestige is not noted for it's power, in fact quite the opposite.

    the o ports and unique stringbed on the rebel 98 provides for deep pocketing - you have an oval shaped head with it's longer mains AND you have the o ports which allow for greater string movement. similar to the london in that you get excellent dwell time and great ball pocketing.

    if you hit very flat and dont drive over the ball to create spin the stringbed will feel hot as you have a good size sweet spot with the rebel 98 and balls may appear to fly on you. if you come across your body with your follow through you get very good control from this frame. in fact i would call it a control frame with some pop.

    in my opinion the rebel 98 is a great option for an intermediate to advanced player looking for a softer frame with some pop. it very much reminds me of my old volkl tour 10 mp v-engine and it is ironic to me that both are yellow but as i said my rebel is blacked out :cool:

    it takes some time to get dialed into the o port feel but they definitely do what prince claims. i am not a prince guy and prefer my kneissl's and dunlops but i really do like the prince rebel 98
     
    #30
  31. tom4ny

    tom4ny Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    also want to add that i usually prefer multifilamint strings in my frames, which are stiffer frames than the prince rebel 98. in the prince, with it's lively stringbed i prefer a polyester full bed set up but drop the cross string tension by 3 lbs as i do with all my oval shaped frames. isospeed axon mono is a nice choice.
     
    #31
  32. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    what tension is your full poly setup?
     
    #32
  33. tom4ny

    tom4ny Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    56/53 same as my red stars as the head shapes are very similar. that is my reference tension for this head size and shape and it works for me :) (with full string setups not hybrid stringing)
     
    #33
  34. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    why drop crosses for oval frames? Would that mean for rounder frames you don't drop them at all?
     
    #34
  35. tom4ny

    tom4ny Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    782

    correct, on rounder frames no dropping of tension at all.

    with oval frames the mains are longer and on very oval frames, or isometric frames like yonex, they are twice as long. i know that stringing machines account for this to a degree but it doesnt take into account that tension drops after so many hours of playing, and it does not drop equally between mains and crosses.

    i feel that i get better playability over the life of the string job by dropping the crosses. it also seems to widen the sweetspot without adding lead.

    with a hybrid string job you can accomplish the same thing but you need to take into account the relative stiffness of one string to the other and adjust accordingly so it is more an approximation and more trial and error adjustments may be needed in order to get to the right tension variance.

    glad you asked? hehe. anyway, i know it is a debateable subject but i also know that it has worked for me for years so i ain't changin a thang!

    have a great weekend and enjoy your rebel 98!
     
    #35
  36. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    #36
  37. JMcQ

    JMcQ Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    133
    Jack,

    How do you compare the Rebel 98 with your DC Pro? As a former owner of the DC Pro, I would be really interested in your thoughts.
     
    #37
  38. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    If u liked the DC Pro, go straight to the Rebel EXO3 Warrior 100. It's VERY similar and the specs are almost identical to the DC Pro. The Rebel 98 is much lighter feeling and less powered than the DC Pro. Also the hoops shapes are very different...the Rebel is oval/egg shaped and the SC Pro is rounder...so is the Warrior.
     
    #38
  39. Veens

    Veens Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2012
    Messages:
    102
    Between the HYIGRadi Pro and this One. What do you think of it?
     
    #39
  40. BC1

    BC1 Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,171
    Location:
    Florida
    I agree. And the head shape and string pattern makes a difference in the overall feel and playability. Warrior for more of a spin game, 98 for more of a flat game.
     
    #40
  41. tom4ny

    tom4ny Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    oval shaped frames by design tend to be control frames and not top spin monsters. prince calls the rebel 98 the player's tweener and that really describes what this frame is all about. the racquet has some pop and with it's higher swing weight, it will do some work for you. still, it is geared for those who have long fast swings and developed strokes.

    i have 2 more of these puppies on the way.

    for me it is what i was hoping for with a boris becker melbourne light. it has that nice ball cupping and lively response but still has precise control in a lighter package. it feels soft yet is solid. a modern fame with traditional feel.

    the dunlop bio 300T is still my current favorite in this class and the 2 frames compare pretty well. the dunlop is more precise and the string bed is more consistent and less lively but the sweetspot is bigger on the rebel 98 and control is still very good. interesting in that i prefer a multi or gut in the dunlop but like a co-poly in the prince rebel 98. a poly firms up the string bed but you still feel the ball cupping if you stay in the mid to low tension range. the feel of the ball is more crisp on the dunlop bio 300T and you feel a little more connected to your shots.

    i will continue to play test this frame over the next couple of months and experiment with different strings. prince has done a great job here and it sounds like all of their updates are a hit. i am actually glad that they are finally offering a 98" oval frame as the choice of 95" or 100" round kept me away. but i like what i found in this prince.

    the only other frame that i am excited about this year is the volkl x9.
     
    #41
  42. goherd27

    goherd27 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    235
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    What has been your experience serving with this frame? I have been serving well on my flat serve 1st but have had some trouble dialing in the second when kicking it out wide. When I do get it dialed in, it usually is has good kick and ball action.

    My London and Melbourne seem to offer more consistency on the second serve.
     
    #42
  43. tom4ny

    tom4ny Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    782

    that is interesting what you say about having more consistency on your 2nd serve with your london and melbourne! i shall keep that in mind as i admittedly have not served much with the rebel 98 and that part of my game tends to be most affected by racquet switching.

    i still primarily play with my kneissl's but during drills and practice will hit with other (similar) frames. while i have hit some serves with the rebel 98 i honestly cannot give you a good opinion on how it performs in this area and it would be wrong for me to extrapolate from a few practice serves.

    now that i have made a bigger commitment to this frame i will definitely be serving with it more. it has a higher swingweight than my kneissl red stars and leaded dunlop bio 300t's so i am anticipating that my serve will be impacted and adjustments will be needed. with the tight string pattern that i am used to i do not get a wicked kick on 2nd serve anyway so my issues may be different than yours (just thinking out loud).

    w
     
    #43
  44. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    ^^^

    serve is always the last thing to "click" for me with a new racquet. Sometimes takes up to 2 weeks until it really dials in.
     
    #44
  45. BC1

    BC1 Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,171
    Location:
    Florida
    Update from my experience with the rebel 98... Like many racquets, the strings can make a big difference. I loved the demo, bought a new one, and didn't have the same great results, and even started having some arm problems. Turned out it was just the new poly strings at too high of a tension.

    I waited a week, and even thought about selling or trading it. THANKFULLY I DIDN'T!! Played with it again twice yesterday (singles and doubles) and now that the tension has lowered, it plays like a totally different racquet (and like the demo I loved). Perfect control, very comfortable, and more power. No arm problems as all. I'm loving everything about it!!

    String the rebel 98 with a soft poly at around 52, or a multi, and it really is the perfect lightweight players racquet with amazing control and a surprising amount of pop and forgiveness.
     
    #45
  46. JackB1

    JackB1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    14,041
    Location:
    Atlanta GA
    Makes sense. I never like my racquets right off the stringer, but a few days I'm back in love :)
     
    #46

Share This Page