was greg rusedski's serve great

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by manny pacquiao P4P king, May 21, 2009.

  1. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165
    i never watched his matches, i know that he has power, but was it dominant in the 90's, and if so, why didn't he win a slam?
     
    #1
  2. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    It was big, 149mph with the old speed gun(probably over 155mph with the new speed gun), but it was no Sampras's serve.
     
    #2
  3. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165
    nooooooooooo roddick's serve is bigger
     
    #3
  4. Datacipher

    Datacipher Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,611
    On the radar used at the time, the 149mph serve would have been more like 165mph on current radar, HOWEVER, the 149mph radar was also recorded on a very suspicious radar which seemed to be recording everyone fast. It may have been roughly equivalent to the radar used today!

    It is very likely that Rusedski, at his best, was as fast or faster than Roddick. I note also that Roddick is more consistent with his faster serves(and thus can use his "fastball" much more often), while Rusedski resorted to a lot of slice, slice/topspin to keep his percentages up. When Rusedski really let go, it was probably as fast, or a TOUCH faster than Roddick.

    Rusedski's serve didn't "dominate" consistently, because his fastball was not terribly consistent. His slice and topspin serves, while good, were not particularly outstanding. Sampras, Ivanisevic and many others had serves more damaging, except perhaps on the 1 day a month where Rusedski served all out and happened to get a lot of flat serves in.
     
    #4
  5. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    You may be right about the suspicious radar gun, but I remember Rusedski match with Roddick and they were serving at around the same speed, averaging 130+mph...
     
    #5
  6. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Rusedski never served any faster than 142.5 mph except that one 149 mph serve, and that particular match he was clocking surprisingly high on the radar gun.

    The guys here summed it up nicely already. His flatter serve was a killer, but he resorted to his much more consistent topspin-slice a lot, just like Goran. And, being a lefty, he also used his slice outwide on the ad side a lot.

    He had 10 matches with 30+ aces, though

    37 aces in 4 sets vs Sampras (grand slam cup 97)
    35 aces in 5 sets vs stark (wimby 97)
    34 aces in 5 sets vs goran(vienna 97)
    33 aces in 3 sets vs gollene-(london 98 )
    33 aces in 4 sets vs delaitre(wimby 95)
    32 aces in 3 sets vs reneberg (wimby 97)
    31 aces in 5 sets vs kiefer (vienna 99)
    31 aces in 3 sets vs waske (wimby 2003)
    30 aces in 3 sets vs toJo (stockholm 96)
    30 aces in 5 sets vs ulihrach (USO 98 )

    In comparison, I have Sampras with four 30+ matches, Karlovic with 27, Philippoussis with 16, Wayne Arthurs with 22, Ivan Ljubicic with 10, and Goran Ivanisevic with 34
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2009
    #6
  7. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    30+ aces is usually an indication that the matches were long and tight. Players who has more weapon than just the serve usually don't have to ace an opponent outright and they can resort to hitting a safer flat bomb and finish off the point with a forehand or volley instead.
     
    #7
  8. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    But four of those 10 matches were 3 setters. That's 10 aces a set, which would translate to 20 aces in a regular straight sets match ;)
     
    #8
  9. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Like I said, rediculous number of aces is an indication that a player has to rely on his serve so much that he has to hit a risky flat bomb that an opponent can't even reach. Goran was an exception because he can hit a safe flat serve and it would still be an ace...
     
    #9
  10. jaggy

    jaggy G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    12,722
    Location:
    Carrboro, NC
    Greg Rusedski.....who?
     
    #10
  11. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    It doesn't work that way. 3 tight sets can produce more aces than 5 setters that are not very tight. The pressure of the match usually brings out the best in a one dimensional players who has the serve as their only weapon.
     
    #11
  12. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    I see your point... but what has to do with the OP question?
    Was Greg's serve great? Yes, it was. It wasn't MARVELOUS as Goran's, Pete's or Richard's, but I would ranking him Top10 of all times.
     
    #12
  13. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    To answer the OP question, Rusedski's serve is not great by any means. The one thing which happens to be the most important thing is consistency. His serve, while big, lacks consistency, accuracy, and clutchness under pressure.
     
    #13
  14. jelle v

    jelle v Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,991
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    It was a pretty good serve.. but Rusedski lacked the game to back it up. Decent forehand but that was about it..

    I couldn't care less about Rusedski, the guy's behaviour was the worst.
     
    #14
  15. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,482
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    It takes a bit more than a powerful serve to win a slam. I mean look at Ivo Karlovic, he probably has the biggest serve on the tour right now, but he won't win a slam or even come close.

    Rusedski did make the US Open final in I think 1997 though.
     
    #15
  16. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    New York City
    I think Rusedski's "149 mph serve" tends to give him more attention that he deserves.
     
    #16
  17. Cesc Fabregas

    Cesc Fabregas Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    8,318
    Agreed his serve was big but nowhere near as good as the best serves in the 90's.
     
    #17
  18. DunlopDood

    DunlopDood Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2009
    Messages:
    448
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Old speed gun, new speed gun? This is just funny, does it mean that the speeding ticket I got last week can be disputed? hahaha
     
    #18
  19. psYcon

    psYcon Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    624
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I saw Rusedski vs Sampras back in the 90s on tv. Rusedski was serving and was down 0-15. From there he served 4 consecutive aces to win the game. Sampras was really pissed off and not being able to do anything.

    So yes, bottom line, he had an amazing serve. Also a friend tells me he saw Rusedski live and claims he has never seen a person generate so much kick on the second serve as Rusedski.
     
    #19
  20. NamRanger

    NamRanger G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    13,916
    Rusedski did have a very good serve; however he didn't have the game to back it up. Goran and Sampras had far more game to back up their games (Sampras in particular). His percentages also weren't very good when going for the big one.
     
    #20
  21. Madhoshi22

    Madhoshi22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    296
    Location:
    Texas
    He had a very good serve by any means, his fast ball definitely had some juice, and his slice and kick were pretty good. As others have noted, his consistency on his serve was questionable, as were the groundies behind it. Sampras and Ivanisevic were much more consistent on the serve, and had far better groundies behind it.
    He did have the fastest serve for a while at 149, which with today's technology, would probably be over 155.
     
    #21
  22. MomentumGT

    MomentumGT Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    637
    Location:
    Riverside/Stockton CA
    I saw Rusedski live at Indian Wells when I was 17 or 18. . .can't really remember. . . I'm 30 now. He was playing Thomas Enquist. Rusedski had a monster flat serve but he used his kicker out wide quite a bit, and that was a nasty one to return. It just seemed that even if he blasted a flat one in as long as Enquist can return it Rusedski was in real trouble as Enquist had a monster FH and it was clicking that day. Rusedski plays very fast and it seems like his service games would last only 5-8 minutes then it was Enquist's turn to serve. LOL.

    I would say some of you guys are right in that he didn't have the game to back up his serve. He hit lots of chips and slice floaters deep to get Enquist off of him. He would S&V a lot too but that FH volley was terrible. . . like a ranked 16 year old jr. LOL. At least from what I remember. . .I was actually a fan of his back then. :oops:

    -Jon
     
    #22
  23. ChanceEncounter

    ChanceEncounter Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,269
    The point still stands.

    If someone wins 6-0, 6-0, 6-0 and the opponent never so much as touches their serve, they still only have 36 aces, and that's miles more dominant than anything Goran or Rusedski ever put up.

    Having a huge ace count often implies that they need the serve to finish off points (often lacking any other reliable strategy) and that the match was tight and went into more games per set and sets per match. Keep in mind that the tighter the game, the more points per game there are; the tighter the set, the more games per set; and the tighter the match, the more sets per match.

    Going by pure ace counts is very misleading. A better proponent would be ace percentage (aces per total number of serves), aces per game, or aces per total points won.
     
    #23
  24. GS

    GS Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,313
    Location:
    Oakland
    I saw Rusedski hit his then world record 142 mph serve against Chang back in the mid-90s. It sounded like a rifle shot. He later said that he wasn't surprised, since he strings his sticks at a semi-low tension.
    Then in 2001, he hired Pat Cash at his coach, who smoothed out Rusedski's hurky-jerky serve n volley style. He then beat Agassi easily in the San Jose final. Then the two had an argument about money and split up---he then went back to his old non-winning style. He blew it, somewhat. Like Cyndi Lauper once sang, "Money. Money changes everything."
     
    #24
  25. jimbo333

    jimbo333 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    4,003
    Location:
    Windsor, England
    Well it was faster:)

    Although definitely not as consistent, and his backhand was rubbish:(
     
    #25
  26. el sergento

    el sergento Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    Montreal
    Greg Rusedski.........the most boring player to watch in the history of tennis.

    I will give him one thing though, killer drop volleys.

    Also, he used to make me feel good about my backhand, because his was so horrendous.
     
    #26
  27. jimbo333

    jimbo333 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    4,003
    Location:
    Windsor, England
    I think Rusedski may win a "Worst Backhand" poll, it really was awful:(

    In fact it shows how good his serve must have been, when you think about it!!!
     
    #27
  28. el sergento

    el sergento Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    Montreal
    Agreed. It's so bad it makes Roddick's butt stance of a backhand look like Agassi's buttery smooth motion.
     
    #28
  29. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165
    ta...............can't watch any vids on greg to find out
     
    #29
  30. Tshooter

    Tshooter Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,216
    The guy had as much chance to win a slam as Karlovic.

    Except Karlovic can hit a backhand so maybe Karlovic has the edge.
     
    #30
  31. fps

    fps Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,437
    Location:
    Brighton, England
    or maybe rusedski got to a slam final so he has the edge :roll:
     
    #31
  32. jimbo333

    jimbo333 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    4,003
    Location:
    Windsor, England
    He genuinely did have an awesome serve, and a very good forehand:)

    On the rare occasion that he got his backhand working, he was very difficult to beat by anyone!!!
     
    #32
  33. fps

    fps Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,437
    Location:
    Brighton, England
    i was never a huge fan of his game, he was our *adopted* brit lol, hard to beat for sure, think rafter deserved to win their final (USO 97 was it?)

    the proto- feliciano lopez?
     
    #33
  34. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,090
    Location:
    uk
    #34
  35. tennis-hero

    tennis-hero Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,090
    Location:
    uk
    #35
  36. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    I dont think his serve was even close to the best even with its speed. I would rate Roddick's serve over his, and I dont think Roddick even comes close to the greatest serve of the 90s.
     
    #36
  37. el sergento

    el sergento Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    Montreal
    #37
  38. el sergento

    el sergento Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,200
    Location:
    Montreal
    #38
  39. dataseviltwin

    dataseviltwin Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    203
    Location:
    Assimilated
    Lefty serve. Nothing to back it up. Break him once a set... game, set, match.
     
    #39
  40. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    rusedski has some seriously sick spin on his second serve. he is like an upgraded lopez serve. though he used more slice than lopez as lopez uses kick spin more.
     
    #40
  41. rafan

    rafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,212
    Yes he had a great serve but apart from that he has a great personality. Sadly his career did not turn out the way he wanted it to
     
    #41
  42. Datacipher

    Datacipher Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,611
    Not true of course. He was one of the most unpopular pro players of his generation among his peers. His entire career was marked by objectionable behavior, from his early "defection" from Canada to his absurd, faked british accent (immediately after the defection) which prompted mockery even from Canadians, Brits, and even Andre Agassi, right to his poor sportsmanship at the end (bad mouthing people like Todd Martin and Pete Sampras). Not to mention his steroid usage (and subsequent successful, but absolutely ludicrous argument to get off on the charges). Simply a whiney, fake, cheater.
     
    #42
  43. Mikael

    Mikael Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,049
    It would be dumb to say Rusedksi didn't have a great serve. He reached a slam final and consistently got into the top 10 with little else in his game.

    I remember that match against Enqvist at the 1998 Indian Wells when he served 149mph. His serve was on fire that day, at one point he won something like 25 consecutive points on serve against Enqvist, who was one of the best returners in the game at that time. He ended up winning in three sets, mostly thanks to his serve.

    But, case in point : a few weeks later they met again in Miami and Enqvist thrashed him 2 and 2, because his serve wasn't on that day.
     
    #43
  44. rafan

    rafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,212
    Well I must admit I only saw some of his play and was impressed with his serve. I can only judge him how I see him today and he comes over as a thoroughly pleasant person
     
    #44
  45. Gugafan

    Gugafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,954
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    Rusedski had a greater slider out wide. It was his stock serve that got him out of trouble.

    Certainly one of the most dangerous left handed serves during the 90's. He was a pretty solid serve volleyer, but did not possess the hands of a Henman or Sampras.
     
    #45
  46. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    but yes rusedski's groundstrokes were ridiculously bad...amazing that he was he was ranked so high.

    lol.
     
    #46
  47. Leublu tennis

    Leublu tennis Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,426
    Location:
    Moldova
    Is he still playing? I thought he retired a couple of years ago.
     
    #47
  48. Datacipher

    Datacipher Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    4,611
    Hey, fair enough, I am probably quite a bit older than you. He can in an interview, usually sporting a goofy grin, but he was involved in many controversies and as I said, it was no secret that he was not very high on the popularity list among the players.
     
    #48
  49. WillAlwaysLoveYouTennis

    WillAlwaysLoveYouTennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,735
    Location:
    Deutschland
    Yea, this fits the category of FORMER tennis pros, different section to post under. He's been retired for a few years at least.
     
    #49

Share This Page