Was Roddick an example of someone who should've had a One Handed Backhand?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Cacoepy, Sep 9, 2012.

?

One Handed Backhand?

  1. Yes

    20 vote(s)
    48.8%
  2. No

    21 vote(s)
    51.2%
  1. Cacoepy

    Cacoepy New User

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    19
    Location:
    UK
    Personally, from watching Roddick I always got the feeling that his backhand slice came much more naturally to him, and the two hander restricted him.

    Do you think Roddick would have fared better with a One Handed Backhand?
     
    #1
  2. RF20Lennon

    RF20Lennon Legend

    Joined:
    May 2, 2011
    Messages:
    7,225
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    exactly!! his early coach probably talked him into using a two hander as it was the new thing if you will but he really shouldve been a one hander!
     
    #2
  3. Defcon

    Defcon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,708
    Roddick didn't have nearly enough talent to hit a 1hbh. It requires a lot more timing, footwork and feel.
     
    #3
  4. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,456
    I think EVERYONE would have fared better with a one-handed backhand. :)
     
    #4
  5. The Bawss

    The Bawss Banned

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,829
    Location:
    Lyon, France.
    Hahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha Roddick couldn't even manage a two-hander, explain to me how he would have acquired the feel, footwork and timing necessary to take a 1-hander to the top of the game?

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
     
    #5
  6. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    yeah i agree with you guys i don't think he would be able to pull it off. it was a shot for him that was just to put it back into play. it was his weakest wing.
     
    #6
  7. SStrikerR

    SStrikerR Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    2,046
    Location:
    Not Fantasy Land
    This is idiotic. What logic led you to this conclusion?
     
    #7
  8. 90's Clay

    90's Clay Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,330
    Hes strikes me as someone who should have worked on his footwork, movement, speed and net game. Which would have helped him have a solid backup for his big serve and FH.

    You don't have to have a GREAT BH to be very successful.. Neither Fed or Pete had this. But you do have to have to fantastic footwork, movement and speed. Something Roddick was short on which killed him
     
    #8
  9. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,456
    I beg to differ. I think both Sampras and Federer have great backhands. Watch some of Sampras' matches from the early-90's to see what a great backhand he had.

    But I agree that Roddick needed to work on his footwork and movement more.
     
    #9
  10. AnotherTennisProdigy

    AnotherTennisProdigy Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    891
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    I dunno, but Roddick seems to have a tense swing, it seems like he almost muscles the ball. Also, his problem with the two hander was that he relied to much on the left hand. Take away that left hand? Disaster.
     
    #10
  11. The Meat

    The Meat Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    1,998
    If he had a Wawrinka backhand it would have made a good match with his forehand(pre-pushing era).
     
    #11
  12. roberttennis54

    roberttennis54 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    695
    I think you have a point. It is impossible to know without seeing him hit the one handed backhand. His slice actually developed into a great shot and was the second best on tour after Federer's.

    Look at someone as talented as Federer and he could not hit a proper two handed backhand. Players are different and I think you need some flexibility when coaching. The two hander is certainly not easier for everyone and Roddick may have been one of those people.
     
    #12
  13. tacou

    tacou Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,036
    You people laughing are proving OPs point. Roddick's backhand always looked extremely uncomfortable and "restricted." His slice over the past few years looked much more natural, and during his best matches he hit it very well.

    So maybe if he practiced a 1 hander from age 5 or whatever, it would've been a much more natural shot for him. It doesn't involve at all taking the Roddick we know today and applying a new backhand. It could have changed his entire game.

    I don't think it would have won him another slam or anything but it's an interesting question. Maybe hill whip it out on the Legends tour.
     
    #13
  14. roberttennis54

    roberttennis54 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    695
    Roddick is fast enough and he does not have great hands. He was never going to become an Edberg. Having said that he improved his volleys until they were decent. What cost him slams is that Federer was better. Worse still Federer not only matched up well game wise, but had the freakish ability to read his serve. If Safin had not got injured in 05, then things would have been different for Roddick. Roddick could always beat Safin no matter how well he played. Had there been a 4 way rivalry, then Roddick would not have changed his game so drastically and with a lucky draw won a couple of slams.

    By the way Federer DOES have a GREAT backhand. This is why Federer could beat guys like Davydenko, Agassi and Murray going backhand to backhand for most of the match. When it mattered Federer's backhand was a huge weapon.

    Sampras did not have a great backhand, but he had a good solid backhand. It did not really break down in his prime. No matter how much you attacked it. He was very conservative with it though apart from on big points or when he got tired. When a big point came along he would hit it well and aggressively more often than not.

    Prime Pete was not the Sampras of the late 90s. His serve and volleys improved post his prime. His backhand deteriorated dramatically as did his forehand, his returns and movement.
     
    #14
  15. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,238
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    Not sure I agree. There's a fair number of people I'd say slice better.
     
    #15
  16. roberttennis54

    roberttennis54 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    695
    Around 2009 I would like to hear those names. Henman and Santoro were gone. Maybe there was someone else lower I have forgotten, but off the top of my head cannot think of a top 30 player around that time with a better slice.
     
    #16
  17. BevelDevil

    BevelDevil Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,541
    One aspect of both the 1hbh and 2hbh is proper weight transfer. Roddick does this poorly. Check out the 2nd top-rated comment on this vid, then watch and decide for yourself.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULefIkMyZ7c

    He'd be in big trouble if he used this kind of footwork on a 1hbh.


    On the other hand... maybe the poor weight transfer is a product of him trying to muscle the ball with his left hand, which wouldn't be an issue with a 1hbh.

    Also, if he ended up with a weak 1hbh, perhaps that would have forced him to attack the net more, and develop better volleys, earlier in his career....
     
    #17
  18. paulorenzo

    paulorenzo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,587
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    i agree. eg. despite james blake not being nearly as successful as roddick, i felt he was more competitive against federer and agassi off the ground than roddick ever was because his footwork and and movement backed up his aggressive forehand.
     
    #18
  19. Russeljones

    Russeljones G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    12,378
    I think a more pertinent question (in terms of human mehanics) would be whether Roddick could have translated the obvious strength in his right arm and back to an effective OHBH. If we look at Almagro and Wawrinka, for example, we'll see that they have a lot of snap on their backhands and their 1st serves are nothing to sneer at. Would it be possible to reverse-engineer a comparison for an hypothetial OHBH for Roddick?

    I must congratulate the OP for coming up with a very interesting talking point and I look forward to the experts' opinions.
     
    #19
  20. paulorenzo

    paulorenzo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,587
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    dub postdubstep wahwahwah
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2012
    #20
  21. paulorenzo

    paulorenzo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,587
    Location:
    Virginia Beach

    roddick is indeed showing poor weight transfer, but i also think he's using it to counter balance his rotation on the backhand, as you noted with his left arm muscling the ball. i don't see the use of it in a two hander though, at least the way roddick is doing it, planted on the ground with a not so angular swing.

    monfils and nishikori do it when they're airborne hitting flashy high backhands but they incorporate more angular rotation than roddick does, neither are planted in the way roddick is, and both coil up with their left leg forward before kicking it back.

    ironically, i see more use of this technique(roddick's left leg kick thing) in the ohbh than the twohander, since in the ohbh it's crucial to keep your torso and trunk from opening up too much. on tour, fed and gasquet use it regularly depending on where the ball is in relation to them. it is usually used when an ohbh player doesn't need to or is unable to step into the shot with his dominant leg. that's why it's also common on the ohbh return.

    edit:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghnFZCtkBX0 gasquet
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCQ50D2fIKI fed
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOyoPZUhUTM&feature=relmfu fed return


    which then leads us back to roddick's weight transfer problem in the video. he has so much time to step in fully (indicated by his early unit turn and stutter steps) and follow through with the left side of his body to get back to open stance(one advantage of the twohander), he doesn't. he's robbing himself of potential power and a quick recovery position.
     
    #21
  22. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Sampras used to have a great two handed backhand as a junior, but changed to 1 hander just 1 year before he turned pro. But again, Roddick is no Sampras, so I don't think he will have the talent to switch to a one hander at will...
     
    #22
  23. paulorenzo

    paulorenzo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,587
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    apparently, roddick's junior coach didn't want him to win wimbledon 8)
     
    #23
  24. BorisBeckerFan

    BorisBeckerFan Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,164
    Agree that both Fed and Pete have/had pretty sweet backhands.
     
    #24
  25. cork_screw

    cork_screw Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,568
    Why so Roddick could have been more inconsistant than he already was?
     
    #25
  26. NikeWilson

    NikeWilson Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    683
    omg he would be worse with a 1 hander!
     
    #26
  27. paulorenzo

    paulorenzo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,587
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    it can't be much worse than andy's own two hander. there's more upside than down.
     
    #27
  28. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,496
    Location:
    So Cal
    You are a funny guy. Sampras' BH was below average for a pro. I saw plenty of his matches. If he got in rallies he lost. His serve is the reason he has the house in BH, the trophies and the trophy wife. Again, if his BH were that good, there would be a French Open title on his resume.

    OP, the real answer is Roddick was let down by his junior coaches - he should have never been put on tour with such a weak BH - didn't matter whether he used 1 or 2 hands. It's obvious he didn't practice it enough. Same with volleys. They stressed winning matches and getting a junior ranking - so his big serve and FH were enough.
     
    #28
  29. WhiskeyEE

    WhiskeyEE Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    5,310
    With a 1 hander I'd imagine it being of the Lopez/Rusedski type. Just slice everything and every once in a while go over top of it.
     
    #29
  30. tistrapukcipeht

    tistrapukcipeht Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,324
    Roddick is no example for anyone about anything.
     
    #30
  31. tistrapukcipeht

    tistrapukcipeht Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,324
    What a thread [​IMG]
     
    #31
  32. bhallic24

    bhallic24 Guest

    is this a joke post? Its like telling me that Roddick don't know how to ride a bicycle, would he have faired better trying a unicycle.
     
    #32
  33. paulorenzo

    paulorenzo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,587
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    a bicycle to a unicycle is not a proper analogy to compare a two hander to a one hander. you're insinuating that the one hander is vastly inferior.
     
    #33
  34. Russeljones

    Russeljones G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    12,378
    Bitter much? Sampras must have been better than average in every department of his game to win 14 Slam titles.

    The OP came up with an original question and I am nto surprised it's being swept under the carpet here. All that matters is petty rivalry and snide remarks from pseudo-experts.
     
    #34
  35. PhrygianDominant

    PhrygianDominant Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,014
    Roddick suffered from a lot of bad mechanics in his tennis. His takeback for his two hander was sudden and snappy, and as Aggasi said probably too reliant on his left hand. Roddick may have developed a more attacking game and had better net play if he had learned a 1hander, but who's to say.
     
    #35

Share This Page