Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Bad_Knee, Oct 16, 2012.
But I don't claim to be a female
And then Nadal didn't play for the rest of the year. Did Rosol really prove anything, other than that he can beat an injured opponent? And the fact he needed 5 sets is far from impressive.
Actually every Roger Fedoper fan is obsessed with Nadal, so you couldn't be more incorrect.
I AM female,DFTW,and doubting me has definitely given your double account away.
And your obsessed with those fans and federer :twisted:
Nah, as everyone knows and regularly points out, most of my posts are about Nadal.....
If Sampras was a little better in claycourt events he would have had a larger more negative h2h against guys like Bruguera and Kuerten.
Thus I am not concerned at all with Federer's 50% claycourt based h2h against the greatest claycourter of all time. Federer is certainly much more consistant than Sampras was in his peak years rarely unlike Sampras losing rarely to players ranked outside the top 5 during his 5 best years compared with Sampras's 5 best years. (Comparing 1993-1998 vs 2003-2009 in terms of consitency %)
Okay, is DFTW is supposed to be some guy called DjokovicForTheWin who's been banned or something? Why would you say I'm that guy? Djokovic isn't even one of my 5 favorite players.
Rosol proved that Nadal mentally cannot handle losing to players outside of the top 4. Notice there's no injury news from Nadal's mouth when he's WINNING? :lol: He can't take his loss like a man unless it's against a top player like Djokovic because Nadal respects Djokovic. He won't give credit to lower tier players though.
Rosol proved nothing. Rafa got defeated by his knees (same as 2009).
Well...Rosol still is more popular than you, Clarky. :lol: Have you ever played on center court at Wimbledon in front of a packed house and beaten a legend and received a standing ovation?
The bitter *******s coming out more and more. :lol:
Rafa was a bitter loser from the beginning when he bodychecked Rosol once he realized Rosol wasn't going to roll over for him. The *******s can't handle the fact that their beloved Rafa got stomped in the 2nd round of Wimbledon.
Bitter *******s with their excuses.
And the silly *******s still don't realize that Nadal has always struggled at Wimbledon. Despite winning and making finals, he's struggled in 5 set matches against players like Soderling, Youzhny, Haase, Petschener and Kendrick. Why so shocked that Nadal lost to beast-mode Rosol?
He isn't one of DFTW's favorites,either. He is a raging ******* in disguise.
I'm not him but, by all means, continue to believe so. Atleast until you "dry up"
Separate names with a comma.