Discussion in 'Health & Fitness' started by TeamOB, Apr 16, 2014.
How bout two marathons each day?
Same here. When I was in my mid-late 30's, and training hard, I could go sub 5 min in summer track meets. Now (about 20 years later) getting below 6 min would really, really, hurt. Sub 7 would just hurt.
Mon-Thu 5:25 on the first mile, beat the clock on the second mile.
Fri 4:35 on the first mile, beat the clock on the second mile.
Classic hobby jogger troll...
So you are negative splitting by almost a full minute M-Th to "beat the clock" and break 10 minutes. Then you come out and run even 4:30s to break 9 minutes on Friday
...just because you can
Marathon is an unhealthy distance IMO. I've never understood the fascination with it. I ran this one as an exchange student in Frankfurt. I literally decided to run the marathon 5 days before the event, but I had been over distance training for5K distances, so I was ready......just not for the pace I chose.
I was running 40 minutes 5-6 days over the winter at 8 min miles, sometimes I'd dip down to a 7:30 pace. I play a lot of tennis in the summer, so I run 1-2 days a week now, which works pretty well. Running is still the "super sport" for me. So much more effective than tennis.
Maybe its like Mt Everest ? Or putting yourself through the ultimate test. Pushing yourself past your normal "limits".
Yes, the 6:10 pace you mentioned earlier did seem a little aggressive, assuming you were not a serious, committed marathoner on high mileage. I tried to do some conversions to the metric system and it seems a 6:10 would get you to around 2:30 or so. Maybe faster.
(My 21 milers used to be at 4 mins/km which I think is about a 6:30 pace which would result in roughly a 2:40 marathon.)
How about that thing called the Iron Man Triathlon :shock:
A little better than 2:42. My goal time was 2:45.
You were at about 2:50 marathon pace
I am not sure of the mile pace. It was 21 miles (34 kms) in 2 hours. I remember back then doing the calculation. That leaves me with 8 kms which at that pace is 32 mins. Plus the 200 meters. I don;t know whether I should adjust for "hitting the wall", or assume I might go faster with competition.
So i figured that was a 2:36 to 2:40 pace. (The route was measured by car, so i am also willing to add a few mins for any deviation).
I am glad I finally read the whole thread.
The highlighted (for) marathon run times, I know I'm gonna puke before even finishing it! Maybe aiming for a 5:00 marathon time is prudent for me--not kidding, I mean the dream of doing it in 3:00 at first attempt just seem oh-so-hard now even just by thinking about it. So I should never try it. Salute to all of you who's done it at least once.
All but the marathon were done on the same day.....and he did the marathon 3 days later. Just awesome!
Salute to Dean Karnazes, 50 marathons in 50 consecutive days! I mean I am still plotting for my first ever marathon.
My best was 5:58, and my lat one I ran was 6:20. I just hate running long distance though. Yes, I consider a mile long-distance.
Yep, long distance running is inefficient. A waste of time and a perfect source for repetitive stress injuries, to put it mildly.
I don't know about the waste of time part. I have two financial podcasts to get through (an hour each) and a nice run would chew up at least one of them. This looks like it will be a 45 mile week for me.
It definitely pays dividends on the tennis court. Is it the most efficient approach? Probably not. But it certainly doesn't seem to hurt.
I do exactly 10 miles a week nowadays, well for nearly 3 years now after uni. 2-miles a day with no warmups. I drive to the track and everything from waking up in the morning and getting ready is warmup enough. Efficiency rather than redundancy.
I made $35K trading last week.
It's nice listening to my podcasts.
Good for you. Well done, you're gonna need all those runs to stay sharp!
But as my sig reads, time is your friend; impulse is your enemy.
It looks like you're several decades younger than I am - believe me, I know a little something about time. And patience.
Of course and evidently you know what you are doing.
Meantime, we are really following the running thread here, aren't we?
Separate names with a comma.