What level is a former D1 player?

Discussion in 'Tennis Tips/Instruction' started by Mansewerz, Jul 19, 2009.

  1. Mansewerz

    Mansewerz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,164
    Location:
    Caught in No Man's Land
    Actually, two questions:

    -How do I know which division (1, 2 or 3) a college is in tennis? (NIU is the one i'm asking about).

    -What level is a D1 college player, and what level would he be in now if he's in his late 30s early 40s?
     
    #1
  2. SethIMcClaine

    SethIMcClaine Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    304
    Location:
    Harrisonburg VA
    -E-Mail their athletic director if you cant find it on the colleges website
    -Youre not going to find an answer to that question with
     
    #2
  3. WBF

    WBF Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,970
    Location:
    Somewhere in NY
    #3
  4. Nanshiki

    Nanshiki Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,285
    A former D1 player could be anywhere from 5.0 to 7.0...regardless of age, depending on how good they were and whether or not they've gotten better or worse. James Blake was a former D1 player... same goes for a lot of top pros (ie, John Isner).

    They could also be weaker if they left the game and their skills or fitness has declined.
     
    #4
  5. VaBeachTennis

    VaBeachTennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Messages:
    610
    Location:
    Sunny Va Beach
    My hitting partner is a former D1 players, who is also a teaching pro. Their skill level DEFINITELY depends on what they have been doing since they stopped playing at that D1 level..................
    He's played some tournaments last year, but he's been primarily teaching (novices) and it's affected his game. The only time he gets to "hit out" is when we play 4 to 5 times a week. I'd say he's between a 4.5 and a 5.0, he hits with a lot of top spin (western grip) that will will bounce over your head if you don't take it early, but that's when he only has time to set up on it. I tend to hit through the ball more with a lot of top spin and it seems to give him a little trouble. He can also benefit from better footwork. He's in his mid 30's and I'm in my early 40's. We always have pretty good matches, the winner depends on who is "on" and who is "off", it's pretty even.
     
    #5
  6. GuyClinch

    GuyClinch Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    4,902
    I think it also depends on the program - and what position he played on the team. With tennis some of the smaller schools do have pretty good programs. Top Div. I program - at least 5.5 IMHO.
     
    #6
  7. VaBeachTennis

    VaBeachTennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Messages:
    610
    Location:
    Sunny Va Beach
    What would you consider Pepperdine's program to be?
     
    #7
  8. BounceHitBounceHit

    BounceHitBounceHit Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    6,015
    Location:
    In the moment.
    Good One!! ;)BHBH
     
    #8
  9. BounceHitBounceHit

    BounceHitBounceHit Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    6,015
    Location:
    In the moment.
    Top D-I schools are 6.0 plus top to bottom. BHBH
     
    #9
  10. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,189
    Anywhere from probably 3.5-4.0 if they haven't touched a racket in 20 years (maybe <2.5 if seriously injured) to 7.0 (guys in their late 30's have won Davis Cup matches). McEnroe is in his 50's and still plays WTT. The question doesn't make much sense.
     
    #10
  11. BounceHitBounceHit

    BounceHitBounceHit Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    6,015
    Location:
    In the moment.
    the very best senior players with successful pro careers behind them can of of course compete with anyone, especially in doubles. Mac is a fine example of this-agreed. BHBH
     
    #11
  12. Mansewerz

    Mansewerz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,164
    Location:
    Caught in No Man's Land
    So during college, he was at least 5.0?
     
    #12
  13. beernutz

    beernutz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,430
    Location:
    Make TT better, use the Ignore List!
    #13
  14. 2ndServe

    2ndServe Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    985
    one of the guys I with as a junior used to be play at UCLA in the 70's. This is old school, went through some problems and never picked up at racket for like 20 years. Still would hit at a 5.0 level with an old ass racket only thing keeping him back was fitness. The top ten D1 schools have some serious talent I'd say if a top 10 d1 player never touched a racket for 5 years still beat just about any 5.0 and below.
     
    #14
  15. imalil2gangsta4u

    imalil2gangsta4u Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,751
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    #15
  16. treo

    treo Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    371
    It all depends. I'm a 4.0 and I played a Div. 1 player 6 years out of school who had a winning record, mostly doubles. First time he beat me easily with his serves, volleys and touch shots. Second time we played those shots were not working and I beat him with my serve and groundies.
     
    #16
  17. Kick_It

    Kick_It Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    442
    It totally depends on the player, what and how much they actually played in college against what level of competition. The key thing is what they've done since then - with most recent being the most important.

    Lots of folks stop playing for at least 10 years. It was nearly 15 for me. A lot of it depends on what shape their body is currently in. People's bodies change often for the worse and are more injury prone by people's late 30s and early 40s.

    If I had to make a gross generalization, I'd probably start at 4.5 - though I've seen examples of people who are both higher than that more commonly than lower.

    The one common thread I've seen with former players at this age range is they have good hands and most are pretty smart.

    Good Luck! K_I
     
    #17

Share This Page