what NTRP is this kid?

Discussion in 'Tennis Tips/Instruction' started by formula16, May 1, 2010.

  1. OKUSA

    OKUSA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,220
    Location:
    TN
    After having watched a 1/3rd of the video, considering 2/3rds of it was the same point slow motion twice (worst video production ever made)

    He can't even hit a winner past another kid while being inside the service line, how is he suppose to hit one against an adult?

    Not to mention these are a selection of shots, so they are his best points he played. Anyone can have highlight reels spread over a couple of matches
     
    #51
  2. dr325i

    dr325i Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,233
    Location:
    TX
    Can we see your highlights and winners please?
     
    #52
  3. beernutz

    beernutz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,399
    Location:
    expanding my Ignore List
    I think this kid would be considered a sandbagger in a typical USTA 4.0 league.
     
    #53
  4. Noaler

    Noaler Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    423
    I would agree that he probably wouldn't be hitting winners against the adult league but he would definitely beat them with accuracy. He's not strong enough to blast winners against the harder hitting opponents but if he had ever regular hit with them, then he should be on par with them or win by accuracy. I know some younger opponents that regularly get tough match scores against easy and hard opponents but always win (until a certain level). They get the ball deep enough against the harder opponents but can't attack against easy opponents and usually they can handle fast serves if they are constantly exposed to them.
     
    #54
  5. Ambivalent

    Ambivalent Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    2,865
    Yeah, because a tournament where Federer/Nadal/Djokovic/Andy Murray/Any other top 10 player has played is the same as Tokyo :oops:
     
    #55
  6. autumn_leaf

    autumn_leaf Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    it's the internet..everything sounds more confrontational lol.

    and i don't think all 3.5s can beat him, probably hardly any, only certain types that can think things through and are physically advantageous like my friend. most people have a darn hard time returning a ball above their heads. this kid to return serve would have to stand quite far back or else the ball will be 1-2ft above his head, either option means a weak reply which a serve and volleyer can take advantage. at 6'4'' it's going to be hard to get a ball by him if you're standing really far back, and lobs have to be really high and accurate to get above the vertical reach.

    but for the majority of players and especially all the people that are baseline bashers that are too afraid or not skilled enough at net, well they're pretty much doomed. if you have this type of game without a good serve 3.5s are destroyed while 4.0s can be somewhat competitive.

    i have seen some 12 yo hit the crap out of the ball, but they were faster and taller. this 9 yo can no doubt wipe the floor with 3.0s, most 3.5s, and a good percentage of 4.0s imo. at age 12-14 he'll probably be dominating 90% of the tennis population because he is being groomed to go pro.

    all this can probably be solved if there was a video of him playing a match with a 4.0. but i think most people want their kid to be viewed by the public in a godsend way so if he doesn't do well the videos will only be kept for analysis purposes.
     
    #56
  7. Roy125

    Roy125 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    944
    Location:
    San Diego, California
    I think that anyone that can easily maneuver the ball and be consistent with it can beat him. So I think that 4.0+ people are good competition for him.
     
    #57
  8. Blee1613

    Blee1613 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    414
    I think he'd be a top 4.0 or low 4.5.

    Just read this description for a 4.5

    Starting to master the use of power and spins and beginning to handle pace, has sound footwork, can control depth of shots and is beginning to vary game plan according to opponents. Can hit first serves with power and accuracy and place the second serve. Tends to overhit on difficult shots. Aggressive net play is common in doubles.
     
    #58
  9. OKUSA

    OKUSA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,220
    Location:
    TN
    Qatar should be a major tournament too since Federer, Nadal, and Davydenko went to it this year right? No to mention Murray, Nadal, Roddick, and Federer last year

    Tournaments are rated on history, prestige, and points. Then maybe judged on what players attend
     
    #59
  10. autumn_leaf

    autumn_leaf Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    yea...umm those descriptions are absolute garbage. the only way to figure out a person's rating is to see who they can beat/compete with. people read those descriptions and think they're at least a 3.5 or 4.0 when they're really just 3.0s competitive wise. it's all about consistency and strategy not how much power you have in the beginning levels,
     
    #60
  11. Jmu008

    Jmu008 New User

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    61
    What is wrong with you guys? This kid is amazing...I'm going out on a limb and saying 4.5+. Based on the vid of course, which mite be deceptive because it looks like a highlight reel.
     
    #61
  12. Kick Serve 14

    Kick Serve 14 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,021
    Sorry, but I can't believe that this kid is 9...
     
    #62
  13. SourStraws

    SourStraws Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Messages:
    327
    I think a 4.0 could beat this guy...I and a couple other ppl Ik have played with Melanie Oudin's sister before and she can hit with us but in competitive matches, the physical difference is just too great. The kids a good player but he's only 8. He'll be better when he gets bigger.

    S.S.
     
    #63
  14. HunterST

    HunterST Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    3,412
    Alright. I've had it.

    If you think anyone under 4.5 could beat this kid, you're wrong. Plain and simple. Accept it.

    Everyone that is arguing the kid would win provides real tangible arguments.

    All arguments against are essentially: "OH C'MON, HE'S 9!!!"
     
    #64
  15. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    35,707
    You guys can say all you want, but you are not and haven't been 4.5 or 4.0 players....yet.
    Once you achieve that moderate goal, you'll find you have played plenty of child prodigies, have the ways and the means to defeat LITTLE KIDS, and you won't think he's so great.
    Can you imagine Kiteboard or Yaz, or Jolly fearing this little kid? NO CHANCE. They'd place the ball just out of reach, drop angle and shot, lob this shorty, and then hit a normal rally groundie for a winner when the kid realizes he's been TOYED with, not played against.
    How can you, as 3.5's say he can beat a 4.0 or 4.5?
    I've already mentioned some juniors I played who THE FOLLOWING year, were easy 5.5 MENS level. And I played them even....them being my regular practice partners.
    This little kid doesn't hit hard enough to ever bother a top level 3.5.
     
    #65
  16. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,465
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Uhmmm, you sure you know what you are talking about as far as level's go??
     
    #66
  17. zapvor

    zapvor Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,088
    Location:
    tennis courts
    #67
  18. zapvor

    zapvor Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,088
    Location:
    tennis courts
    ok the kid is not 4.5 but hes going to be if this keeps up
     
    #68
  19. autumn_leaf

    autumn_leaf Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    i'm pretty sure i gave more physical reasons....

    and remember your own words

    "Just for the record, I'm not trying to make this a heated argument. Some of my posts sound a little confrontational, but I'm just trying to make my points. All in good fun!"

    again. if anybody has videos of him handedly beating a solid 4.0 player with the playstyle and physical attributes of my friend i will gladly eat my words and admit i am wrong. just don't post some baseliner because that's the direct opposite of what i said could beat this kid.
     
    #69
  20. autumn_leaf

    autumn_leaf Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    what kind of 3.5s do you live near!?!? :shock:

    are you living with abominable snowmens or something? maybe big foot?
     
    #70
  21. Blee1613

    Blee1613 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    414
    I completely agree with you. This kid is phenomenal. I don't care if he played a 10 or 40 year old. He would beat anyone under 4.5. Yeah sure he's not tall enough, not strong enough, but what I see is a kid who hits with great pace, depth, spin, control, etc.
     
    #71
  22. HunterST

    HunterST Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    3,412
    I know, I know, all in good fun. It's just frustrating how blatantly obvious it is that most of the people saying a 4.0 could beat him, are in fact a 4.0 players thinking "yeah, I could beat this little twerp!"

    I don't think you're one of these people, but A LOT of them are

    Haha it'd be a pretty tough/specific assignment for me to come up with a video of him beating a 4.0 serve and volleyer. :p
     
    #72
  23. Ambivalent

    Ambivalent Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    2,865
    Qatar is a 250. Dubai is 500, which is a tier under Masters and two tiers under Grand Slams. I would consider that a pretty major tournament.
     
    #73
  24. autumn_leaf

    autumn_leaf Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Taunton, MA
    this is true, they'd have to be 40 or 50 by now with a degrading game lol.

    people could actually think that just because 3.5 or 4.0 are above their own levels that they must be expotentially better than themselves lol, but i don't think this is the case for many lol.
     
    #74
  25. jrod

    jrod Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,566
    This kid is an excellent tennis player, irrespective of his age. Very natural, fluid movement, keen court sense, excellent shot selection, very controlled and technically sound stroke technique, good depth, good touch, great use of spins, angles, heights, etc. The power will come but I suspect he can get some pace on the ball. I also suspect he can handle pace as well if he is playing 14 year-olds.

    As for an NTRP this is always tricky basing it on a video. I've known some top 14 year olds in my region that handle some of the better 4.0 players, winning with their movement, shot selection and consistency. This kid is better than them. I think this kid could likely hang with the majority of 4.5 players around here no problem, so I'd go with 4.5+ based on the video.

    Regardless, he's extremely impressive for a 9-year old. I'd really like to see him play on the dirt to see if he moves as well there.
     
    #75
  26. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    35,707
    To Draks, assuming you really are a 4.5-5.0.
    Have you ever lost to anyone younger than 14? Don't think so.
    No matter how great a 9 year old strokes are, you can take them out of their game by playing with their heads. They are little kids!
    I've already mentioned some juniors I used to practice with. Those were 17 year olds who WON pro tourneys, or made top level college the following year.
    Little kids cannot compete with full grown adults unless the adult ALLOWS it and pampers the kid.
    Heck, you can take this kid out of his game by just knocking him down on changovers.... :twisted::twisted: His mom would come running, cause a big scene, and that might qualify as coaching during the match....:twisted:
    HE"S NINE!
     
    #76
  27. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,465
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Lee, I'm just pointing out that you equated a certain poster as a 4.5, when in fact, he is no higher than a 4.0 (max), and has struggled to beat 3.5's, and I'm nearly certain the kid in this vid will beat him easily.
     
    #77
  28. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    35,707
    OK, you got me.
    But this kid would have no chance against you, or me. We'd physcologically take him out of his game. He's a kid. And hits soft, consistent loopy balls.
     
    #78
  29. sonicare

    sonicare Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,733
    Location:
    london
    Stop spouting nonsense.

    Are you even following the argument in this thread?

    No one is claming that this kid will beat everyone on this board.

    We are just saying that he will beat most of us and the claims of him being a 2.5 are ridiculous.

    And ofcourse, he doesn't stand a chance against 17 year olds who have won pro tournies. How genius of you to figure that out.

    Now, PLZ bring forward some arguments as to how a 4.0 will beat this kid.
     
    #79
  30. OKUSA

    OKUSA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,220
    Location:
    TN
    I think this kid could beat 4.0's, I just think a lot of you are overrating him, comparing him to Agassi saying he's excellent in everything when in fact it's a highlight reel which shows 8 points spread over like 4 matches. Let me see the other hundreds of points and it would make this so much easier.
     
    #80
  31. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    35,707
    Sonicare.
    I never said this kid wasn't good.
    Draks is 4.5. Well within the level SOME responders say this kid can compete with. I'm 4.0, take it personally if you say ANY 9 year old can beat me. Including this kid.
    I never compared this kid to TonLars, LawMan, ClintT.
    Top 3.5 level is better than most anyone who doesn't carry a little black book. As such, will soon be real 4.5, and this kid would just get taken and raped.
    This kid would beat lots of 3.5's, for sure, but not the experienced top level 3.5's, who use physcology as much as strokes to maintain their ratings.
    Try winning a 3.5 tourney, and you'll see.
     
    #81
  32. jrod

    jrod Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,566

    I have to say Lee, a great deal of your posts come off sounding arrogant and boastful. I really don't understand why you feel the need to do this as the natural reaction you solicit from nearly everyone is to cause them to question your credibility. I doubt that is your primary intent in posting.

    There often is some useful information in your posts which unfortunately tends to get obscured by all that bluster. If instead you worded your responses more thoughtfully and avoided the condescending tone, you probably wouldn't have so many negative reactions to your posts.
     
    #82
  33. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    35,707
    If I were arrogant and boastful, I would lie and tell you I was BETTER than PeanutLouie or RollieZalameda. Instead, I only said they were my monthly, or in Rollie's case, twice a week, practice partners.
    Both above were 10 years younger than I was, in '77. Yet they were friends and regular practice partners, because they both needed strong serving lefties to practice against.
     
    #83
  34. MNPlayer

    MNPlayer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    420
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    There is basically one reason why they play dubai: $$$
    Do any of the locals play tennis in the UAE? There's probably a large expat population from the US and Europe supporting the oil & gas industry. Some of those folks might play.
     
    #84
  35. Ambivalent

    Ambivalent Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    2,865
    I think he would be extremely competitive in 4.0s. That being said, I believe that a smart 4.0 player could beat him. I personally believe that I could moonball to his backhand all day and win out in the consistency contest and through fitness. Don't quote me on that since all I have is a video to judge him. At his current page (i never even touched a racket at age 9), i think he's going to be a division 1 level player at 14 or 15.
     
    #85
  36. LeeD

    LeeD Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    35,707
    Oh for sure this kid, if he doesn't get bored or injured, is the stuff of 5.5 in a few years.
    But adults can intimidate little kids, even 3.5 adults. I know some 3.5 mens who hit forehands as hard as most pros, hit first serves only to see it flatten against the back fence, are 6'4" tall and 240 lbs of muscle, and would scare this kid to death during changeovers!
    Tennis is not all strokes. Even at good 4.5 levels, gamesmanship, intimidation, timely bad calls, foul acting behavior, all are just as important as consistency, depth, and placement.
     
    #86
  37. Noaler

    Noaler Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    423
    What would you say about a kid whose 11 years old and top 30 nationally?
     
    #87
  38. jrod

    jrod Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,566

    Oh boy, who else, besides me, can hardly wait for THE ultimate authority on NTRP ratings to weigh in here?
     
    #88
  39. Slazenger07

    Slazenger07 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,068
    Lol. Yea right. Most of my forehands would kick up well out of his reach...he would be one unhappy little boy at the end of the day!
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2010
    #89
  40. user92626

    user92626 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    6,142
    I had played with a very good kid, 14 yrs, before but that was like over a year ago when I was so far off my current -- I updated my form almost every week for better. Let me tell you, this kid had all the correct form strokes and footwork, used a light babolat, aeropro strike or something. Some adults who knew him told me he had gone to school training.

    It was very enjoyable playing against him cuz the ball kept coming back. However, the speed and power were missing and there was only so much running a kid can do. In the end, it added up and he made more UEs and was really tired out and lost. 2 sets but scores were kinda neck to neck. :oops:
     
    #90
  41. supineAnimation

    supineAnimation Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,032
    I'd go with a 3.5, but only because he is so limited by size and strength. If he had these same strokes and footwork and a few years and some puberty, he'd be a solid 4.5. But I used to hit with kids this age that played on a national level in the late 90s and the size of their gait alone made it very difficult for them to cover the court playing against a decent adult.
     
    #91
  42. Puma

    Puma Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    389
    Location:
    Texas
    I think it really unfair to say this kid cannot take out good 3.5s. And while we are at it, why are some here trying to point out the difference between experienced 3.5s and normal 3.5s. To me this reads sand bagging 3.5s vs honest 3.5s.

    Just by virtue of him being able to rally in front of a crowd and hit well with a legend says something of his experience and confidence.

    This kid would kill 3.5s. He moves well and hits the ball really well at chest level and above, which is difficult and advanced.

    If and adult male has this kids skill sets he would be way above a 3.5.
     
    #92
  43. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,165
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Kids got amazing talent and technique. Would love to see him play some real match points (and not just a highlight reel - which is what the video really is).

    However, if he played against a 3.5-4.0+ adult male with a good serve, I think he'd be overpowered.
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2010
    #93
  44. jrod

    jrod Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,566

    Completely agree. He does move exceedingly well, hits smart shots with good placement, depth and spin (even if he does lack pace). My feeling is the primary reason why this kid would easily handle 3.5 level players is his consistency. I've never seen any 3.5 player this consistently. In fact, this kid is more consistent than most 4.0 players I've ever seen.
     
    #94
  45. Bud

    Bud Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    31,165
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    I agree with you. However, if it's the rare 3.5-4.0 player with a great serve... the kid would probably be toast.

    Any true 4.5 or higher adult male would take the kid out in straight sets.

    Be really interesting to see his progress 10 years from now if he's still playing.
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2010
    #95
  46. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,465
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    There is a kid at the club where I live (about 9-10 years old) who beats 3.5 players. Not out of the ordinary for him. However, when he comes up against 4.0 or higher, especially with a decent serve, he has trouble. Still, he competes with them, and the kid in this video is way better than the kid at my club.
     
    #96
  47. Nellie

    Nellie Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,773
    I remember reading that Baghdatis was playing Davis Cup for Cyprus when he was 12, so I could image that a strong 12 year old male could be a 6.0 player.
     
    #97
  48. jrod

    jrod Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,566

    Hey Bud - I'm likely to agree with you, provided we agree on the definition of a "true 4.5 or higher adult male". I've been playing several 4.5 level players and have a pretty good idea of what this level has to offer. My sense is the consistency differences between the top and the bottom of the 4.5 level are, well, enormous.

    So the top 4.5 players in my area would more than likely give this kid a hard time because they would be able to match his consistency, yet be able to bring the added dimension of power at the right times, giving them the clear edge. The low to mid-level 4.5 level players might be able to overpower the kid, but my experience tells me they would make just as many unforced errors as they would successful shots, effectively neutralizing this power advantage. In this case, the edge goes to the more consistent player, which may very well be the kid. Hard to say definitely without playing him.
     
    #98
  49. Puma

    Puma Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    389
    Location:
    Texas

    ^^ Good point........

    At my courts there is a family of kids. Older brother, middle brother and daughter. The girl is about 12. They homeschool and play tennis. They travel all over to tourneys. The oldest boy is about 17, the middle is about 15.

    I am not sure 3.5 would have much chance against this girl. I have watched her play with her brothers and the 17's left handed serve. The boy can kill it! She can return most of it if she can get to it. She has good volleys and a good overheard and a killer forehand. Her technique is impressive. I know I don't want any part of playing with her. Any high ball is killed by her. I know there is nothing I can throw at her she cannot handle.
     
    #99
  50. tennis_balla

    tennis_balla Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,666
    Location:
    Here and There
    You guys are a laugh and need to give your ego's a rest. I was coaching at John Newcombe Tennis Ranch while the Harrison brothers were still there. Christian was around 9 or 10 years old at the time. A 3.5/4.0 would have a tough time beating him, I'd put my money on the 10 year old. Its funny how same say "I've seen kids like this at my club all the time" No you don't, you see good 9 or 10 year olds, but these guys are way ahead. Anyways, I'm sure people are proud of their NTRP ratings and all but I keep saying it, competitive juniors couldn't give a rats *** what theirs is. All they care about are rankings and match wins, not how well they're doing on the NTRP ladder.
     

Share This Page