What racquet is 95 sq. in. but not so heavy?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by berzerker, Aug 30, 2009.

  1. berzerker

    berzerker New User

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    11
    I serve hard and come up to the net frequently. I'm using a 110 sq. in. Volkl now and I figure my (tendencies) or game is better suited to a smaller head size.

    I demoed the AG200 4D which is almost 12 oz and my outside wrist began hurting after the 2nd basket. Not to mention the balls seemed dead, but I guess that was the 18 x 20 string pattern.

    Anyways I don't think my wrist is ready for any racquet much above 11 oz.
    But I would like the smaller head for less resistance on my serve and at the net.

    So are there any 95 sq. in. racquets that aren't so heavy? 10 oz - low 11 oz range strung?

    16 x 19 please the 18 x 20 was lifeless.

    Any ideas?

    or I could always give up and just get a PDGT :(
     
    #1
  2. [d]ragon

    [d]ragon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,466
    [K]Tour or NTour come to mind
     
    #2
  3. GinoGinelli

    GinoGinelli Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    144
    ......................
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2010
    #3
  4. skyzoo

    skyzoo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,461
    #4
  5. Mdubb23

    Mdubb23 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,695
    Location:
    Completing the point with a shoulder-high punch in
    ^No, too high of a swingweight for what he's looking for.

    Your best two options, IMO, are the [K]Tour, or the Rebel Team.
     
    #5
  6. pshulam

    pshulam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,398
    Location:
    Minneapolis
    #6
  7. dennis1188

    dennis1188 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    768
    Many on my usta 4.0 team (serve & volley) like the Blade 98....should be good deal on used.
     
    #7
  8. dincuss

    dincuss Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,639
    Location:
    World
    #8
  9. meowmix

    meowmix Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,852
    Location:
    Hanover, NH
    The radicals also come to mind- despite the 18 by 20 pattern, they're not that dead.
     
    #9
  10. mrtrinh

    mrtrinh Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    839
    exactly what I was thinking, ntour two's are also cheap now
     
    #10
  11. smiley_face

    smiley_face Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    139
    Technifibre TFight 295 VO2 could be a good choice, though it seems to be unstable at first.
     
    #11
  12. Rexking

    Rexking Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,301
    Sounds like you need to tried the Yonex RQIS 1 Tour light.
     
    #12
  13. Kenny022593

    Kenny022593 Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,168
    Location:
    Binghamton/Rochester
    Yonex? RQiS 1 Tour Light? RQiS 1 Tour XL Light?
     
    #13
  14. berzerker

    berzerker New User

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    11
    Woah, love this place.
     
    #14
  15. TennisNinja

    TennisNinja Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,522
    Location:
    Someplace, Somewhere
    Yep me too.
     
    #15
  16. hescobal

    hescobal Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    SF, Lower Pac Heights
    You should try the Dunlop Aerogel 200. I also felt the 200 4d to be a little heavy, and fatigue me quicker. The Aerogel 200 helped with that
     
    #16
  17. fuzz nation

    fuzz nation Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,632
    If you're getting into serve and volley style of play, I'd recommend that you not be afraid to try several racquets, including a few that are somewhat hefty. As long as a frame has a more than mild head-light balance, it ought to be rather maneuverable, yet stable enough to pop the ball well and not get pushed around.

    If a racquet is just too heavy, then it's not going to be a smart option, but I've tried those Dunlop 200's and they wouldn't be my first choice for serve and volley work, mostly because of their balance. For me, they're sort of sluggish. You might like the Dunlop 300's a bit more since they're lighter, but there are other alternatives including the Yonex RQiS 1 Tour along with their RDS 002 and heavier 002 Tour, which is a very nice S&V frame.

    It's also pretty simple to add a little lead tape to a lighter racquet that you like, but want to be more stable. Just a possibility to keep in mind. Ideally your wrist should be rather passive when you're serving and as long as your racquet isn't insanely heavy for you, there shouldn't be much of any strain in that joint. Make sure that you're using a smooth motion that doesn't rush up to contact - your wrist shouldn't be tight or steering the racquet to the ball too much. Let those bigger muscles in your legs and core make the drive to send the racquet through the ball and you can take the strain off of your wrist.
     
    #17
  18. honz

    honz Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2008
    Messages:
    180
    You could try one of the Aerogel 300's from Dunlop...older or newer versions. They have 98 sq inch heads, but otherwise the specs seem to fall in your wheelhouse.
     
    #18
  19. mtr1

    mtr1 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,386
    Location:
    England
    Wilson K Six one team
     
    #19

Share This Page