What would score be if Federer and Nadal played on grass this year?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by federerhoogenbandfan, May 30, 2006.

  1. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    I predict it would be a score of 6-3, 6-0, 6-2 for Federer.
     
    #1
  2. edberg505

    edberg505 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    6,073
    Bagels and breadsticks.
     
    #2
  3. brucie

    brucie Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,318
    Well I assume it would be over in 3 sets!

    Nadal does want this match to come about though working on his slice and his volleys, so maybe we will see the new chip and charge nadal!
     
    #3
  4. Alexandros

    Alexandros Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,400
    These threads are stupid. Very stupid.
     
    #4
  5. The Pusher Terminator

    The Pusher Terminator Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,927
    since Nadal dominates Fed on clay and hard courts I guess you guys need something. But just remember....no one really plays on grass. Its an idiotic and outdated surface. Real tennis is either played on clay or hard courts...when is the last time you played on grass?
     
    #5
  6. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,949
    Terminator, Wimbledon is still the biggest jewl of the grand slams.Even Nadal has huge fantasies about winning it.:lol:
     
    #6
  7. Simon Cowell

    Simon Cowell Rookie

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Messages:
    354
    On grass at Wimbledon? Nadal d. Federer 7-6 (8-6) 6-3 4-6 6-1
     
    #7
  8. wyutani

    wyutani Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,760
    Location:
    hong kong
    :shock: nah. not yet. maybe 5 years from now.
     
    #8
  9. BabolatFan

    BabolatFan Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    790
    Location:
    East Coast
    Ok I don't completely agree with your scoreboard...my speculation would be...um...6-0, 6-4, 6-2
     
    #9
  10. Viper

    Viper Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,478
    Location:
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Federer d. Nadal 6-7, 7-5, 6-2, 6-4


    I imagine that Nadal gives a huge scare in the first set because the 2 never played before, and then the Fedexpress figures him out near the end of the second, making it easy sailing after that.
     
    #10
  11. The Pusher Terminator

    The Pusher Terminator Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,927
    Thats true...but in reality it is an outdated useless surface. Again, when is the last time you played on grass?
     
    #11
  12. Count Grishnackh

    Count Grishnackh Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    397
    Yeah exactly, Nadal's shots would skid even faster on the grass.
     
    #12
  13. FEDEXP

    FEDEXP Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,110
    Dream on, Nadal will not be in the Final at Wimbledon....
     
    #13
  14. Vlad

    Vlad Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,437
    Fed would win in 3 tight sets such as 6-4, 7-6, 7-5
     
    #14
  15. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    13,949
    This is nuts, Roger's backhand would be feasting all day on Nadal, remember the ball gets lower on grass.
     
    #15
  16. Fedexeon

    Fedexeon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,950
    You know nothing about tennis. Outdated? Then why they are still playing on it?
     
    #16
  17. Polaris

    Polaris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Agreed. I'm going to change my bookmark to the racquet forum and try not to spend time in the Pro Player forum until some of these ridiculous Federer/Nadal threads have gone away. It seems like the posters with the most ill-considered and polarizing posts on the Pro Player forum don't go to the racket forum that much. Might have something to do with their tennis acumen ;).
     
    #17
  18. HollerOne5

    HollerOne5 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    644
    It is outdated, ask anyone on the tour and they will agree. It will never be changed because Wimbledon is the ultimate tradition. They refuse to change anything, like prize money, dress code, sunday "rest" day, etc etc and all the snotty bowing before the British royalty, give me a freaking break. I think Wimbledon needs to join the times. If Wimbledon changed their surface, I guarantee the lead-up tournaments on grass would be changed as well. Their only purpose is to give players a feel before going into the Championships.

    As for this match, there is no doubt that Federer would probably win, but I think just because of the history of the rivarly already, and Nadal's mental toughness, it would be a close 3 or 4 sets.
     
    #18
  19. superman1

    superman1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    5,243
    How is it outdated? Federer and Roddick consider it their best surface. A lot of guys love the grass. Even those who can't play on grass have respect for it, given that it was the standard for decades.
     
    #19
  20. HollerOne5

    HollerOne5 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    644
    Sorry dude, it is outdated.
     
    #20
  21. superman1

    superman1 Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    5,243
    Oookay...so soft, fast grass is much more outdated to play on then crushed, wet brick that stains your shoes red.
     
    #21
  22. Melissa

    Melissa Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    190
    Thanks Polaris--Now all these young boys will show up in the raquets section.
    Duhhh.
     
    #22
  23. jamumafa

    jamumafa Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    709
    Yesterday - but I live in England
     
    #23
  24. Buuurnz

    Buuurnz Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    310
    Location:
    Hamburg / Germany
    Fed in three....6:4 6:3 6:2
     
    #24
  25. Grimjack

    Grimjack Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,439
    The brick isn't outdated. Just pitiful.

    Remember: three quarters of the world is too poor to pave their tennis courts, so they have to play in dirt. It's the third-world surface. I'm told they sell drugs to pay for racquets in places like Uganda, Brazil, and Spain.

    Anyway, the point is we should pity them and politely applaud their clay-court successes, sort of like we applaud at the end of a blowout high-school basketball game, when the coach brings the fat kid off the bench and he plays his porky little heart out trying to get just one basket. The third-world claycourters are like the fat kids of the ATP. We pretend they matter long enough to keep their parents from feeling bad, but when the real game starts, we know they'll be back on the bench, and we won't have to worry about their under-developed games, barbaric languages, and aversions to personal hygiene.
     
    #25
  26. Arafel

    Arafel Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,153
    Consider me a fan of outdated. I'm actually looking at national tournaments to play in just because I want to play on grass; the closest grass courts to where I am are in St. Louis and Texas.
     
    #26
  27. malakas

    malakas Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,791
    Location:
    Greece
    Actually in a recent interview Nadal said that in 3 years he will be ready to try and give a shot to actually winning Wimbledon.

    But I don't know if he will be able even then.
     
    #27
  28. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    Actually they wouldnt skid since they arent flat and low, it is Fed's shots that would skid lower and flatter. Nadal's heavy topspin shots just would not be as heavy and instead would land right in the strike zone for a big hitter.
     
    #28
  29. bennieboi

    bennieboi Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    182
    some of yall are really ridiculous.... nadal already probably has a hard time playing against fed on clay, do you know how close their last match was? fed had 2 m.p., and we're talking about grass... fed is probably unstoppable on it, only person to take 1 set off of fed last year was kiefer. nadal would get creamed if they ever played on grass. maybe about 6-3, 6-4, 6-2, but who knows? federer has a better chance of taking nadal on clay then nadal going against fed on grass.
     
    #29
  30. fjgarciap

    fjgarciap Rookie

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    329
    The first match between them, Fed would take it 7-5, 6-4, 6-2. If they were to play frequently on the surface, which is quite difficult given the rare events on grass nowadays, Nadal would definetly improve enough as to take a couple of sets and even defeat the swiss.
     
    #30
  31. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    The match between lefty and a righty tends to become a see-saw
    match. Nadal comes out as a winner simply because he wins a few
    more critical points.

    Will we get to see another great see-saw matches between lefty
    and righty at Wimbledon like McEnroe and Borg ?

    I certainly hope so..
     
    #31
  32. d_frank

    d_frank Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Messages:
    242
    Dominates is a big word for a few points :)
     
    #32
  33. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    You're right about Fed's shot would be flatter than Nadal's.

    But Fed himself is not really a flat hitter. He himself hits very spinny balls.
    His success on clay is not suprising.

    By the way, I just found out Nadal already reached 3rd round
    at the age of 17, beating Ancic, in his debut in Wimbledon...
     
    #33
  34. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    If you really think Nadal-Federer at Wimbledon will ever be the equivalent of Borg-McEnroe(heheehe) maybe you did not see Nadal play on grass as last years Wimbledon. :p
     
    #34
  35. Moose Malloy

    Moose Malloy Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,889
     
    #35
  36. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    Out of curiosity what did you mean by this particular statement and how does it relate to this thread. Thanks.
     
    #36
  37. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    We will find that out tommorow I guess. :p
     
    #37
  38. federerhoogenbandfan

    federerhoogenbandfan Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,702
    It is good to be optimistic, even if unrealistic. There is a saying isnt there, "to reach the stars, you must shoot for the moon." :cool:
     
    #38

Share This Page