What's so good about yonex?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by jimbo525, Aug 1, 2008.

  1. jimbo525

    jimbo525 New User

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    67
    What's so good about their racquets? i've only heard of that brand on this forum.
     
    #1
  2. Murray_Maniac

    Murray_Maniac Banned

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    899
    Yea, their not as popular as Babolat, Wilson, Head, and Prince. They just have a certain feel to them. I dont know how to exactly describe it, but its like cushiony and flexy. Personally, I dont like it because Im into more solid stuff.
     
    #2
  3. fuzz nation

    fuzz nation Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,630
    I'm under the impression that they really built their legend on their past generations of racquets. I've tried a couple of current ones and they're certainly not as nice for me as the old pair of MP Tour-1 mids that I've been recently noodling with. Most folks here seem to agree though, that they have some of the best quality control in their products.
     
    #3
  4. Return_Ace

    Return_Ace Professional

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,267
    The quality of the rackets is also generally nice... Paintjob wise they're a little fragile, but i believe they're also one of the only manufacturers to not outsource to china...
     
    #4
  5. jamauss

    jamauss Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,752
    Location:
    https://goldenslam.com
    as far as I'm concerned, the RDS 001 Mid (after being out only about 3-4 years now) almost has legendary status among certain people who play with it. Their racquets are high quality and seem to have a following just like the PC600, PS 6.0 85, POG, etc.
     
    #5
  6. chicubs

    chicubs Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    130
    RDX 500 series was/is just awesome. As someone mentioned the cushiony/flexy feel is almost unrivaled. Also, the amount of spin generation was pretty phenomenal.
     
    #6
  7. hoodjem

    hoodjem G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    12,740
    Location:
    Bierlandt
    I tried an RDS 001 MP and it felt pretty good: muted, solid, with nice tough. I was most impressed with the quality of finish--impeccable.

    Maybe the Mid is even better?
     
    #7
  8. s7evin

    s7evin Rookie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    If i am not wrong, they have the best QC on the current market...
     
    #8
  9. tsongaali

    tsongaali Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Messages:
    796
    Hewitt uses them. That's why they're good.:)
     
    #9
  10. [d]ragon

    [d]ragon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,466
    QC and the large sweetspots (due to the isometric head)
     
    #10
  11. tennisfreak15347

    tennisfreak15347 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,655
    Location:
    NJ
    well, their head shapes turn me away from them, but I hear that the quality control is very good. I've tried out my friend's RQ iS 1 Tour before, and it felt very "cushiony"
     
    #11
  12. soggyramen

    soggyramen Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,457
    they have great QC, have a nice feel and are flexy, and are really spin friendly
     
    #12
  13. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,209
    No Speedports, no Metallix, no K-Factor, no trips to the DarkSide, no sore elbows, shoulders, wrists, and hot chicks dig big isometric heads.
     
    #13
  14. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    6,029
    By what standard or criterion is Yonex "so good?" They don't seem to sell very well compared the the Big 3 (4?), the quality control thing seems to be a myth (1700 series and V-Con series notorious for cracking, low-rent headguards and grips), clueless customer service (I've never gotten a straight answer when I've called to find out about different weights for different grip sizes). Is this a halo effect from the high regard people have for Japanese cars?
     
    #14
  15. Return_Ace

    Return_Ace Professional

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,267
    The VCon series whilst known for having the ceramic crack didn't affect play and when my friend's did, he got a replacement straight away 0.o... did you play with any of them... the vcon 17 mp was sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet.
     
    #15
  16. obnoxious2

    obnoxious2 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    629
    I've hit with a Yonex before and didn't like it at all. I just can't get used to the head shape and the feel is too buttery IMO. It's all based on personal preference for feel and quality (which I would say has one of the best quality controls)
     
    #16
  17. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    6,029
    Yes, I played with both the 100 and 107 V-Con, found them both very comfortable but too light for my game.
     
    #17
  18. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,209
    Too buttery, too flexible, too large sweetspot, too much feel, just too good. WOW!
    Only Volkl gets this label
     
    #18
  19. nCode747

    nCode747 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    712
    They are made in a factory owned by yonex in japan
     
    #19
  20. coolblue123

    coolblue123 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,778
    Location:
    Rockville, MD
    definitely the Quality of the racquet stands out. I really like the science they put in their racquet. Very practical and effective. (i.e. Isometric frames)
    Currently playing with a RDS003.

    And just brought a used Bab APDC, can't believe it, the throat cracked already! So disappointed.
     
    #20
  21. Toxicmilk

    Toxicmilk Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    They are the dominant brand in badminton, but their tennis racquets are great as well.
     
    #21
  22. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,571
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    Yonex makes a superior product. Their frames have always been undersold IMO.

    I recently demoed the RQiS 1 Tour Light and it is a great frame. Great feel, great flex.
     
    #22
  23. After going through just about every major players racquet/brand I settled on the RDS 002 tour. It is the only racquet I've used that actually gets better to me as I use it, instead of slowly revealing annoying flaws.
     
    #23
  24. Seacoast Stringer

    Seacoast Stringer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    410
    Yeah, Yonex makes a fine stick IMO. Not a lot of frills and comfortable frames. Definitely under-rated.
     
    #24
  25. netman

    netman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,616
    Agree with all above. Top quality, consistent performance frame to frame in a series, the right mix of control and power in their player's frames. The Isometric head really does generate a bigger sweetspot that is consistent across its entire area.

    Yonex actually puts a lot of technology in their frames. Big thing is they don't toss something out that works just for the sake of marketing. When they have a tech that works they keep incrementally refining it. If you have a lot of their frames you can trace the evolution of the various technologies back 5, 10, sometimes 15 years.
     
    #25
  26. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,209
    Can remember the tubular aluminum YY-7500 racquets from 30 yrs ago that used some of these technologies like a flexible throat combined with a stiffer head. Power, control, and comfort.
     
    #26
  27. Mansewerz

    Mansewerz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,164
    Location:
    Caught in No Man's Land
    I love my RDX 500MP. I just need a backup for when I crack strings.

    Btw, how was the RDS 001? I heard it was pretty stiff. Was it uncomfortable?
     
    #27
  28. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,209
    Was uncomfortable IMHO, firm but now must temper this as the grip was replaced w/leather. Not stiff like a Babolat or Prince O3 racquet. Also tried the RDX300 as a back-up and it is a bit uncomfortable.
     
    #28
  29. wilfreb

    wilfreb Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Messages:
    427
    Yonex = Japan = quality.

    all the other brands use contracting companies to mass produce their rackets in China, with low quality controls and irregularity in the finish of the models specifications.

    Yonex rackets are made in Japan, by a manufacturing plant owned and managed entirely by Yonex, so the quality controls and materials are superior.

    Wilson, prince and the other major companies spend million is sponsorship thats why they are so famous and cost so much still being mass produced in China.

    with Yonex you get superior quality at competitive prices.


    [​IMG]
    Yonex Co.
    Tokyo Factory
    Japan
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2008
    #29
  30. naturallight

    naturallight Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Messages:
    366
    I love Yonex, but I wish they made racquets with an 18x20 string pattern.
     
    #30
  31. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,209
    Have an RDX500HD, high density string pattern, 18 mains.
     
    #31
  32. Babb

    Babb Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,447
    Location:
    Now down to 4 feet behind the baseline.
    I would try a Yonex, but none of their frames seem much to my liking. With them, there's no go-betweens. The racqcuets I might be interested in that they make are only like 9.something ounces... :(
     
    #32
  33. LafayetteHitter

    LafayetteHitter Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,954
    Location:
    Lafayette, Louisiana
    Rabbit could you comment on the power level of the "light"? I liked the feel of the Rqis 1 Tour but found it really lacked pop and didn't seem to hit as heavy a ball as I might have liked.
     
    #33
  34. netman

    netman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,616
    Yes. I have a YY-7500 hanging on the wall in my office. The Isometric head was already present in the YY-7500.

    I've found the flexy throat/stiff head combo to be perfect for me. The key is to have a thicker tip and thinner throat. Yonex's frames that had thinner tips and thicker throats (NSRQ-7) lacked power.

    -k-
     
    #34
  35. chicubs

    chicubs Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    130
    A backup for a RDX 500mp is a RDX 500mp....that being said I did switch over to a Head Microgel Prestige Pro. Needed a little more heft. Do not regret it...but there are days when i miss the yonex feel. I still have 3 MP frames left though so I can switch back I guess.
     
    #35
  36. netman

    netman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,616
    This myth that the RDS 001 series is way stiffer than the RDX 500 is just that - a myth. I've played the RDS 001 Mid, the MP and the RDX 500 MP. Think about it - why did Yonex discontinue the RDX 500 line so quickly? Because it lacked the power and heft required to stand up to today's big hitters. It was too flexy. So Yonex tweaked the RDX 500 design to come up with the RDS 001 series. Its a better racquet. If you think its too stiff then just string a little looser. I use Topspin strings in both the mains and crosses, strung at 55/52. The added stiffness of the RDS 001 lets the frame do the work so I don't have too. I can swing more relaxed, upping control, and still get good power. BTW, the 2008 model has been tweaked slightly to soften up the frame. Not sure I like it yet, but can tell it is a bit more flexy than last year's.

    -k-
     
    #36
  37. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,209
    The SRQ 400 and 500 IMHO had the best combo of a flexy throat/stiff head. Balls just exploded with spin and power from those racquets.
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2008
    #37
  38. TopShelf

    TopShelf Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    180
    Yonex is the only brand I use now.

    I bought a RDS001 MP and really enjoyed it, but then fell in love with the RDX500 MP.

    I enjoy the soft feel and the spin but my serve is lacking but thats a factor of gaining all the other pro's.
     
    #38
  39. YonexForrealz

    YonexForrealz New User

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    77
    i just like it because the sweetspot and there's some pop on the ball and it feels cushiony
     
    #39
  40. Fedace

    Fedace Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    23,292
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Yonex sweetspot is HUGE compared to head, wilson or babolat. and control is excellent, much better than other manufacturers with exception of possibly Wilson.
     
    #40
  41. nCode747

    nCode747 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    712
    how long has the RDX been discontinued
     
    #41
  42. TopShelf

    TopShelf Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    180
    My guess would be about a year?
     
    #42
  43. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    14,209
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2008
    #43
  44. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,571
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    Sure, I thought it had adequate power. IMO, it didn't play much like a light. It came through the ball and I was able to hit the ball with as much pace as I needed. This frame as a generous sweet spot and was very very arm friendly IMO.

    Hope this helps.
     
    #44

Share This Page