What's the closest 21st century racquet to the Wilson Ultra?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by Bruce X., Feb 23, 2012.

  1. Bruce X.

    Bruce X. New User

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    31
    Just picked up a Wilson Ultra of Craigslist for $20 just to try it. I couldn't believe how well I liked it. I have a BLX Six.One 95 in both patterns and the Ultra felt more comfortable and allowed me to pull off better shots than the Six One's. I'm figuring it's the dual beam and more flexible design.

    I'm wondering if anyone has any suggestions on a modern day racquet with similar design characteristics with perhaps upgraded materials? I tried doing a search on tapered beam on Tennis Warehouse but it didn't show any results. I know there are a few tapered beam racquets out there. Thanks.
     
    #1
  2. bluetrain4

    bluetrain4 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    8,754
    Maybe the 90s released by Wilson? BLX 90, k90, BLX Prostaff 90, etc.
     
    #2
  3. Bruce X.

    Bruce X. New User

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    31
    I have the BLX Six.One tour. Played that against the ultra last night and thought the Federer racquet played firmer. The Ultra seemed more forgiving too. Thanks for your input.
     
    #3
  4. Larrysümmers

    Larrysümmers Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    3,990
    Location:
    1313 Mockingbird Lane.
    vantage blastcore, my speculation tho, im just know that they are quite old-schooly,(at least thats what ive read).
     
    #4
  5. JoelDali

    JoelDali G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    10,498
    Which Ultra?
     
    #5
  6. Bruce X.

    Bruce X. New User

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    31
    Ultra Graphite. After trying this one out, I'm really curious how the FPK and Kevlar series play.

    Does anyone know how the 6.7 stiffness rating Wilson used back then compares to the stiffness rating system used now?
     
    #6
  7. gh65721

    gh65721 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    254
    I think the higher the number the more flexible the stick was. Probably why the Ultra felt softer than the 6.1 tour. The 2.0 Hammers they used to make were notorious arm killers
     
    #7
  8. Bruce X.

    Bruce X. New User

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    31
    Yes, with the older method, the higher the number, the more flex in the racquet. Does anyone know what the 6.7 index Wilson used back then equals to in RA stiffness? Is it like a 58 or 63?
     
    #8
  9. gplracer

    gplracer Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,130
    Ultra or Ultra II? I still have an original ultra. The head size is really small compared to today's standards but it was a great hitting racket. I remember Al Parker, Andrea Jaeger (spelled wrong), and Aaron Krickstein using it.
     
    #9

Share This Page