Actually I have acknowledged numerous times that Federer could be the GOAT and for the record I'll acknowledge it again. The guy asked why Connors didn't win so many majors and I tried to give an explanation. So just take care. Your logic is fine except for your reasoning with me. All I'm trying to do is give some stats. Incidentally my posting history points out the information and I try to be reasonable. I'm sure you don't think I'm successful in this but you know what, I do try. I often used Federer as a comparison because simply he has clearly been the best player of the last quarter century at least so he's good point of comparison for modern day tennis. I think that Federer is a GOAT candidate but I also think others are GOAT candidates. Federer is a fabulous player and in his best years he was very dominant. But tennis has been around for a long time and I honestly don't think he's a slam dunk to be the best ever. I also knock down Roy Emerson a lot because I don't think he's in the same class of players like Gonzalez and Federer because he won only amateur majors against much weaker fields. I've also knock Jimmy Connors many times but people don't notice that because his fan base is less than the present players.