# Which has a better chance of happening?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by imalil2gangsta4u, May 23, 2009.

?

## Which is more likely to happen?

20 vote(s)
54.1%

17 vote(s)
45.9%
1. ### imalil2gangsta4uHall of Fame

Joined:
Mar 3, 2009
Messages:
1,751
Location:
Houston, Tx
Not saying either one will happen. Just wondering, which do you think is more likely to happen and why.

2. ### joeri888G.O.A.T.

Joined:
Jan 23, 2008
Messages:
13,116
Uhh this is easy, there's actually a mathematically correct answer. For Fed winning RG, Nadal has to lose, but for Nadal losing Fed doesn't have to win. Therefore, Nadal losing of course!

Joined:
Jan 28, 2009
Messages:
705
CORRECT!!!!

4. ### BreakPointBionic Poster

Joined:
Feb 18, 2004
Messages:
46,858
I voted for Federer winning RG because Nadal's shirts are so tight I don't think there's any chance of him "loosing" at RG. :lol:

Joined:
Sep 6, 2006
Messages:
10,623
Location:
Harker Heights, Texas
Obviously statistically it would be easier for Nadal to lose RG. Anyone with a brain would know that.

6. ### Joseph L. BarrowProfessional

Joined:
Nov 7, 2008
Messages:
1,252
Well, since Federer winning would virtually require Nadal losing (I suppose he could default pre-match, but it's a negligible probability), clearly Nadal losing is more likely.

7. ### slicekick95Semi-Pro

Joined:
Sep 27, 2008
Messages:
584
Location:
the tennis club
LOL, I deserve a slap because I actually thought about the question and still picked Nadal loosing.

Joined:
Sep 6, 2006
Messages:
10,623
Location:
Harker Heights, Texas
Wow 4 people picked Fed winning as a better chance. Some people need to learn statistics and probability here.

9. ### manny pacquiao P4P kingBanned

Joined:
May 15, 2009
Messages:
165
the probability of both is 0. nadal won't lose, fed wont win

Joined:
May 15, 2009
Messages:
165
11. ### jaggyG.O.A.T.

Joined:
Jun 8, 2006
Messages:
13,689
Location:
Chapel Hill, NC
Its lose not loose, ah that drives me insane.

12. ### BreakPointBionic Poster

Joined:
Feb 18, 2004
Messages:
46,858
What's more likely: Federer winning the US Open or Nadal losing the US Open?

13. ### joeri888G.O.A.T.

Joined:
Jan 23, 2008
Messages:
13,116
Some people here don't have English (or no capital E?) as their native language. I think most of us are trying or best really..

14. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
YOU FOOL DUDE!!!! If Federer won than that would mean automatically Nadal lost. Basically if you pick either option in the poll you are picking the same choice. There is no option that Nadal would win so if you pick Fed to win that is no different than picking Nadal to lose. Some people need to learn how to read here.

15. ### oneguy20Banned

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
45
Both choices mean a Nadal loss.

16. ### oneguy20Banned

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
45

What is more likely:

Federer winning and thus Nadal losing.
OR
Nadal losing, but Federer not necessarily winning.

Obviously it's the latter option because it allows for a wider range of possible outcomes.

17. ### P_AgonyBanned

Joined:
Jul 16, 2008
Messages:
13,185
However there is a (slim) possibilty that both Nadal and Federer losses, so the poll choices are not exactly the same.

However, if Nadal somehow finds a way to lose early, I bet Federer will do just about everything to win it. He'll know it's a chance of a lifetime. He won't let Murray or Djokovic stop him.

18. ### gj011Banned

Joined:
Aug 21, 2007
Messages:
6,543
Location:
Back from prison
What are you talking about. Nadal losing and Federer winning is not the same thing. They both can lose.

This being said, the poll is logically flawed indeed.

Joined:
Sep 6, 2006
Messages:
10,623
Location:
Harker Heights, Texas
Um heard of the word Djokovic or the whole field. I heard they got chances to. *******s once again don't understand this concept.

20. ### Dutch-GuyLegend

Joined:
Apr 27, 2009
Messages:
7,085
Location:
Amsterdam,The Netherlands
Neither will happen.What a poll!!!

21. ### rubberduckiesProfessional

Joined:
Aug 3, 2008
Messages:
1,254
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

22. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
Are you calling me a ******* you idiot? Get out of here you don't even play tennis. I have stated in my posts that I am a fan of Nadal, Federer, and most of the young upcoming players such as Murray, Simon, Tsonga, Monfils and etc.
Now how about you get a life and enjoy Tennis rather than one player of it.

KEY LESSON: You are a Nadal **** and think that anyone who disagrees with you is a Fed ****.

TRUTH: This is a forum where many will disagree and just because someone does not see the same lines as you does not make them a Fed ****.

Joined:
Sep 6, 2006
Messages:
10,623
Location:
Harker Heights, Texas
Explain to me how Fed has a better chance winning than Nadal losing. I'd love to hear this.

24. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
Nadal Freak meant to say that he couldnt believe more people picked option 2.

Picking option two would mean that option 2 is also true while picking option 1 would not imply option 2. I should have been more specific.

Option 2 of Fed winning = Option 1 of Nadal losing.
Option 1 of Nadal losing does NOT= Option 2 of Fed winning.

so Nadal Freak said that option two is less likely which is not true.
If Nadal loses Fed has the highest chance of taking French Open.

Rubber duckies learn to read the polls too.

25. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
I mean that if Nadal loses, Fed or Djoko will win. but if Fed Wins that means Nadal also lost. This is where the poll crosses over.

26. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
So in turn NF I agree with you that not only Fed can win if Rafa loses but that makes this poll cross over in ways. Don't go calling me a ******* for no reason I simply wanted to state that the poll is more of a trick question than start a war my apologies.

Joined:
Sep 6, 2006
Messages:
10,623
Location:
Harker Heights, Texas
Yes and if Nadal lost, Fed could still lose. That is where it is obvious choice would be. Nadal losing is way more likely than Fed winning.

28. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
Yes I was not specific in what I meant sorry. I meant they both can lose but there is only one option of Fed winning and no option in the poll for Nadal to win so this poll does not even add up to 100% of what could happen.

Example: Nadal wins 2009 FO would make both options invalid.

29. ### gj011Banned

Joined:
Aug 21, 2007
Messages:
6,543
Location:
Back from prison
I am not going into flaws in your explanation.

Just to say that bold sentence is not true.

Joined:
Jun 8, 2008
Messages:
1,089
Location:
uk
LOL

agreed

31. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
True but if you pick fed winning you also picked Nadal losing. However picking Nadal to lose doesn't pick Fed winning which makes the poll in a way invalid.
One choice means to pick both and the other picks only itself.

32. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
gj that sentence is true or not SOLELY based on your opinion whether Djokovic could take Fed out or not. So you are right that sentence is NOT true if you believe Djoko could it but if you believe Fed would take Djoko out than it could well be true.

33. ### tennis-heroBanned

Joined:
Jun 8, 2008
Messages:
1,089
Location:
uk
What i think the poll is saying is

EVEN IF FEDERER WINS

will it be because he outplayed Nadal

or will it be because Nadal played sub-par? and handed Rog the win

now excuse me for sounding like a ******* for a moment:shock: but i do believe the Roger's only real chance to win RG is for Rafa to turn up at 70-80% and then not convert the chances he gets, and for Roger to play the best match of his life

Joined:
Sep 6, 2006
Messages:
10,623
Location:
Harker Heights, Texas
You thought they were equal at first. My idea was right from the start and some dared to argue against logic. haha.

35. ### volleynetsProfessional

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
1,301
Location:
CA
As I said I was not being clear but it is incorrect to think one is more probable than the other because one involves both happening and the option of Nadal winning is missing.

36. ### tacouLegend

Joined:
Jun 30, 2007
Messages:
8,408
If Nadal loses Fed doesn't win.

So...yeah.

37. ### sh@deHall of Fame

Joined:
Feb 1, 2009
Messages:
2,979
Oops why did I click Fed winning? Well I dno. To be honest, I don't see Nadal losing to anyone at RG except against Fed or Djoker. And I think Fed will beat Djoker and meet Nadal in the finals and.... lose again.

Actually, I think the chances of Nadal losing + Federer winning is so damn small, probably 0.01% cos Nadal win = 99.9% that this poll isn't worth it.

38. ### BundeyProfessional

Joined:
Apr 28, 2007
Messages:
1,135
This is more of an SAT or IQ test question than a tennis question. What a failure the OP is. lol

Joined:
Jul 28, 2008
Messages:
285
Location:
My house
Not at all. What a failure this poster is. lol

40. ### oneguy20Banned

Joined:
May 21, 2009
Messages:
45
Sir Probability claims the latter option is more likely.

Joined:
Jul 28, 2008
Messages:
285
Location:
My house
The chances aren't nearly that bad for Fed. Not to say they are good, though..

42. ### sh@deHall of Fame

Joined:
Feb 1, 2009
Messages:
2,979
haha yeah ok, I was exaggerating, but, you get the idea. I wish Fed could win though...

Joined:
Jan 23, 2008
Messages:
13,116

44. ### aceroberts13Professional

Joined:
Jan 28, 2008
Messages:
1,029
Location:
100 Miles Away; Ready to Strike
The more I think about the question, the more my brain starts to hurt. The OP is no longer allowed to ask things like this.
:shock::shock: