which is better, 1hbh or 2hbh

Discussion in 'Tennis Tips/Instruction' started by raiden031, Sep 14, 2006.

  1. raiden031

    raiden031 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,997
    I can do both farely well, but I have a tendency to do a 2 hander when i'm energized and a 1 hander when I'm feeling tired. If I'm going to choose one over the other, I'd like to consciously remove the other from my game until it becomes instinct. Any suggestions on which one is better in the long run? Don't say whichever is more comfortable because I'm interested in becoming the best player I can, not in staying at a plateau forever.
     
    #1
  2. Geezer Guy

    Geezer Guy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Messages:
    2,792
    Location:
    Big Canoe, GA
    The best players in the world use a one-handed backhand.
    But, there are some pretty good players that use 2.

    It might be easier to learn a 2hbh quickly, but I'd say the 1hbh is better in the long run.

    I predict the next person to reply will disagree.
     
    #2
  3. brucie

    brucie Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,318
    Its really about preference! I cant tell you! I prefer 2 for consistancy and stability imho. I love the feel of 1 and the power and angles but its complicated easily goes wrong for me and im slow to executer 1 so i stick to 2. In the long run though if both are equal, id prefer 1 aestheticially and in terms of reach ease of power and angles.
     
    #3
  4. jasonbourne

    jasonbourne Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    1,084
    Location:
    debajo del sol
    I suggest 1hbh, considering the best men/women pros in the past eras used a 1hbh. This provided them more versatility and ability to play all-court if they had to. You will likely be able to volley on your bh side better too.
     
    #4
  5. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    I prefer a 2 hander because im a lot more consistent with it. I would have to say the 2 hander is the better backhand. Seems like a lot of 1 handers are a little more inconsistent and they try to run around there backhand more then someone with a 2 hander.
     
    #5
  6. MasterTS

    MasterTS Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,124
    Isn't it obvious.

    1hb is for good players and 2hb is for the wannabees!
     
    #6
  7. ATXtennisaddict

    ATXtennisaddict Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,278
    I made the switch 2 days ago. From now on it's 1hbh because I generate a lot more spin and velocity.
     
    #7
  8. horridvolley

    horridvolley New User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    83
    i like 1-hand for the reach, angles and most importantly, style. There's no problem hitting "high" balls if you move in and take them before they get that high anyways.
     
    #8
  9. Chang

    Chang Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    389
    1 hand. 2 hand feels sluggish and unweildy for me so I use 1 hand because I'm more comfortable with it.
     
    #9
  10. LoneGun

    LoneGun New User

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    74
    Here's how I feel about both

    1HBH

    Positives:
    - Swings feel more natural
    - Better reach
    - good at getting low balls
    - good for serve and volley players as well as baseliners
    - high versatility
    - able to generate more power from the longer swings
    - looks better

    Negatives
    - need good timing and longer preparation
    - hard to return high top spin balls

    2HBH

    Positive:
    - shorter swing
    - timing is not as important
    - good for baseliners
    - good at getting high topspin balls
    - more consistent and good for high percentage tennis

    Negatives:
    - need good footwork because of the shorter reach
    - hard and tiring to return low bouncing balls

    Hope these help :)
     
    #10
  11. FH2FH

    FH2FH Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    883
    Location:
    US
    All great advice/info, especially the last post.

    My suggestion: stick to the one which produces results; winning is better than losing. Last year my 2H was the "weaker" shot, but I doubled my wins because it was much more consistent. I didn't expect that to happen. I was a 3.0, now closer to 3.5 just because of that change.

    I would also suggest 2H to more beginning to intermediate players b/c of the control and ease of use. A one hander may produce tennis "Greats", but do you have the time/money/will to become one?
     
    #11
  12. harryz

    harryz Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    772
    2H BH for kids, 1H BH for adults

    kids may need the second hand for extra strength and then keep it, like Borg, Connors, Evert, Agassi and so many since. Sampras started with a two-hander and switched as a young teenager since he recognized the many advantages of 1H BH. Some pros can alternate and hit great 2H and 1H BH. Aesthetically, I prefer the 1H BH. For many people, the 2H makes more sense, though. What's better, round or square?
     
    #12
  13. isuk@tennis

    isuk@tennis Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    334
    Location:
    across the street
    round cuz you can't make a wheel out of a square :D
     
    #13
  14. 300Gkid

    300Gkid Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,179
    well IMO its good to use both, i use my 2-hander for a "rally ball" but use a 1-hander for shots i have to reach for, slice shots and to get angles coming into net
     
    #14
  15. nalbandian_fan

    nalbandian_fan Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    407

    Those two negatives that I made bold are probably the main long term differences between the 1hbh and the 2hbh. Footwork, timing, and preparation are all things that you can work on and improve over time.

    The 1hbh is much better for low bouncing balls and the 2hbh is much better for high bouncing balls. You will see many players with 2hbh resorting to 1 handed slices on the low bouncing balls, and many players with 1hbh running to the back screen to return the high bouncing topspin balls. Very few elite players can learn how to hit a high 1hbh(federer), and few players can learn to hit a low 2hbh(nadal/nalbandian). So you need to make a decision of which weakness will be less weak... slicing low bouncing balls or running to the back screen to hit high bouncing balls.
     
    #15
  16. Mark S. Hogan

    Mark S. Hogan Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    234
    Most people would be better off learning a 2 handed back hand. The average human doesn't have the strength or timing to hit a one handed topspin well.
     
    #16
  17. elee3

    elee3 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2005
    Messages:
    170
    Location:
    Southern Ca
    Totally agree with that, I use to use a 1hbh back for a period in high school. Way too hard to receive good serves with a topspin 1hbh, would have to use slice. Very easy to receive serves with a 2hbh. 1hbh demands perfection.
     
    #17
  18. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    Why do a lot of people around 55 or older use a 1 handed backhand instead of a 2 hander?
     
    #18
  19. calabi12

    calabi12 New User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    65
    Because 1hb was more common in the old days.

    Guys, it is all about personal preference. I use the 1hb because I am compact and I felt the 2hb restricted my movement.
     
    #19
  20. Mark S. Hogan

    Mark S. Hogan Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    234
    Right, we almost all hit a one handed backhand. Conners was a turning point. I'm seeing a lot more one handed in the pros again. The Edberg/Sampras effect I think.
     
    #20
  21. AngeloDS

    AngeloDS Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,676
    Neither is better than the other since there's positives and negatives as pointed out. I use a one handed backhand for a few reasons; one to save my knees, it came naturally to me and other reasons.

    Both have variety; Federer (1hbh) and Murray (2hbh). Both have power as well. But when it comes down to it. Consistency is a hard thing to overcome with the one handed backhand compared to the two handed backhand. Especially where a lot of people reside 3.0-4.0 level, consistency is key.

    Tennis is really about placement and consistency. A lot of people *can* hit one handed backhands but not consistently along with having a great deal of control & placement.
     
    #21
  22. Zets147

    Zets147 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,744
    GET A 2HFH with your BRAND NEW 2HBH!
     
    #22
  23. Amone

    Amone Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,864
    Location:
    Detroit Area, MI
    You know, I agree, and yet disagree with you. I will never fully give up my two-handed forehand. It will always, as long as I play, be something I'll use when I need the utmost in consistency, and when I need to warm up my [contintal-eastern] forehand.

    My advice is this: I play a serve-and-volley game (on first serves, and opponent's second serves) but I hit with a two-hander on the backhand. It's more consistent, and if I need that winner, I can usually force the reply I want by muscling it, an advantage that I don't get with my old one-hander. So you can choose a one-hander, for all the reasons that people listed, but my reasons are consistency and power.
     
    #23
  24. Zets147

    Zets147 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,744
    The reason I posted the 2HFH was because I saw 2 girl college players played with 2HFH's on adjacent courts. I believe it was a Baylor vs. Rice match. I don't know which team was which since I am a freshman, but they were hitting pretty well.

    Also, I want to learn to hit a 2HBH for returns, but I've never learned how to hit a 2HBH before, so I usually block back with my one-hander or slice it deep..sometimes I go for a full swing for a winner (only on weak second serves though).
     
    #24
  25. FH2FH

    FH2FH Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    883
    Location:
    US
    Older "club" players probably still use the 1H BH because of their lack of flexibility and/or extended reach. To get the most out of a 2H it's ideal to be flexible so you can accelerate the head quickly (hips & shoulders). The reach on a 1H is also slightly better because one hand is off the handle. A 2H will need better footwork to get the ball in their strikezone, which many seniors will lack (footspeed).

    I agree with everyone who says a 2H is easier to learn and become efficient with over the 1H. I personally would recommend it unless you're talking about someone who will either not expect great results OR will have the resources available (coaching/time/money) to get the most out of a 1H. I don't see that anyone can argue that a 2H is more consistent. There are many, many more framed/mishit balls for 1H pros, not to mention club players.
     
    #25

Share This Page