which is more important: no of weeks at no.1,or no. or years end at no. 1

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by hlkimfung, Apr 21, 2009.

?

which is more important

  1. no of weeks at no1

    26 vote(s)
    86.7%
  2. no of year end no1

    4 vote(s)
    13.3%
  1. hlkimfung

    hlkimfung Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    546
    Theoretically, player A and B can rank at no. 1 and 2 respectively for the 1st 49 weeks of year X, then swap places at week 50 when things shut down. Then player B is the year end no 1.

    People remember player B more than player A. So who is greater?

    a player can at any rank but no1 thru out the year going into the final match of the Master Cup, win it and become the year end no 1 for three weeks for the year, then be dethroned the first week next year at Adeliade, since ranking point are so close, thoughts?
     
    #1
  2. maximo

    maximo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,327
    Location:
    London
    # of weeks.
     
    #2
  3. P_Agony

    P_Agony Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,186
    # of weeks.
     
    #3
  4. Yes,agree.
     
    #4
  5. Cesc Fabregas

    Cesc Fabregas Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    8,318
    Year ending no. 1.
     
    #5
  6. wow246

    wow246 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Neither Nubmer Of Grand Slams And The Money U Make From Tennis Is More Important!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    #6
  7. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Number of year end number 1 can be deceptive. A person can have a total of 4 weeks at number 1 spot, and ended up with 4 year-end number 1. Overall, weeks are better indication of dominance.
     
    #7
  8. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,949
    The year end # 1 is a lot more important.

    The #1 during the year is useful for tournament seedings, no one cares whos leading in the middle of the season. The end of year #1 is useful to determine the best player of the Calendar year before players have an off season and start again the next year to try to be the best player of the year.

    So definitely the year end #1 is more meaningful.
     
    #8
  9. King of Aces

    King of Aces Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    Messages:
    951
    NEITHER.

    In the end no one remebers rankings as they mean nothing.

    Boris Becker is a hall of famer and considered one of the greatest of all time. And yet he never finished a year with a year end #1 ranking,

    Bottom line: who cares?
     
    #9
  10. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    I say year end--shows consistency throughout the year.
     
    #10
  11. DarthFed

    DarthFed Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    I don't really know...no suprise that Sampras fans picked Year end number 1

    I say if they overlap like Fed thats good

    Maintaining number 1 for all the weeks and being year end number 1 for four years shows the consistency not to lose that ranking
     
    #11
  12. cknobman

    cknobman Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,204
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia
    Weeks because it gives an more accurate depiction of how long a person was actually the #1 player in the world.

    You could have two players neck and neck all year and the year end #1 is decided by the masters. Player A could have had the #1 ranking for 40 weeks with Player B on his coat tails all year then Player B wins the Masters and takes the year end #1. Player B is certainly not the more dominant player for the year because he had the #1 ranking for 1/5 the time Player A did.
     
    #12
  13. soyizgood

    soyizgood G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,323
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Year-end #1. Like a race it's not how you start, but how you finish.
     
    #13
  14. kraggy

    kraggy Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    769
    I think it's actually not very trivial and I will present a scenario to demonstrate this.

    Lets say player A and B are neck and neck and then player A plays his favourite (strongest) tournament early in the year and goes ahead in points. The rest of the year their results are fairly identical with player B just doing maybe 1-2 % better than player A and narrowing the gap to something really small. And then player B wins his strongest tournament at the end of the year and becomes year end No 1. He holds this no 1 position until player A's strong tournament next yr and then they swap again. I don't think in this scenario you can clearly say who the better player is .
     
    #14
  15. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    It's all how you look at it. I personally like weeks more than years but really most times years and weeks coincide.
     
    #15
  16. gj011

    gj011 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,548
    Location:
    Back from prison
    Weeks. I shows how long someone really spent on top.

    Year end #1 is just an arbitrary mark.
     
    #16

Share This Page