Which mono shaft wood racquets were available in 90sq head size (or close)

Discussion in 'Classic Racquet Talk' started by AndrewD, Mar 1, 2009.

  1. AndrewD

    AndrewD Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,581
    I'm not talking about wood-graphite frames like the V-24, Edgewood, etc or oversize frames like the Prince Woodie. What I'm referring to are those mono-shaft wooden racquets which had a head size around the 90sq range. Guess they would have been produced at near the end of the wood-era.

    That being the case:

    Can anyone name the models which were produced and does anyone have one (or more) ? Was there a Kramer in that head size (have a vague feeling there was).

    Thanks.
     
    #1
  2. plasma

    plasma Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,356
    yes a Kramer and a Borg, don't know the exact headsize but they were mids...kinda silly looking but supposed to be actually endorsed by Kramer, although don't know if he played them. True story: Kramer was in a board meeting excited and amazed at the Wood mid while Wilson designers and marketing execs cringed...(they were right, no one wanted heavy quality anymore, by then...)
     
    #2
  3. Rorsach

    Rorsach Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,572
    Location:
    Netherlands
    The Borg is less than 85 i think.
     
    #3
  4. plasma

    plasma Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,356
    almost a macro string pattern, eh?
     
    #4
  5. AndrewD

    AndrewD Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,581
    Then I guess the Kramer would be the one I'd prefer.

    Will have to look through my old tennis magazines to see if I can find a picture.
     
    #5
  6. plasma

    plasma Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,356
    it looked like a Kramer on Balco...
     
    #6
  7. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    the donnay borg pro mid is the smallest, it is smaller than 85 sq-in. the wilson jack kramer mid is about 85 sq-in and the dunlop maxply mcenroe mid is the largest. it is close to 90 sq-in.

    [​IMG]

    dunlop maxply mcenroe mid on top of a wilson k90 (six.one tour)

    [​IMG]
     
    #7
  8. plasma

    plasma Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,356
    although any of these mids are clearly sueripor to the six one tour I can't imagine them having the same pro performance as the original standards. Connors withered and died with the ProStaff, his game was built on the t2000, same for arias with his donnay Borg Pro and Krickstein with his ultra standard, or Tanner and his PDP. Their strokes took a major hit with the change to a larger more modern frame. Less pace, less spin.
     
    #8
  9. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    i haven't played with the jack kramer standard and the maxply mcenroe mid but i have played with the borg pro standard and the borg pro mid. for me, the standard version is a better racquet. it just feels a lot more solid, maybe because the racquet throat is larger than the one for the mid size version and it also seems a bit heavier. years ago, i played my one of my best matches with the original maxply mcenroe. it broke as i was hitting a serve and afterward, i switched to the max 200g.
     
    #9
  10. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    i took the dunlop maxply mcenroe mid to the tennis courts today and played with it for about 3 hours. this has got to be one of the most user friendly wood racquets ever made. it definitely felt much better than the donnay pro mid and at least equal to the wilson jack kramer mid (i am not certain because i haven't played with the JC mid for a few months)
     
    #10

Share This Page