Which pro is the most creative

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Bolivian Ace, Jan 17, 2009.

  1. Bolivian Ace

    Bolivian Ace Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    237
    Ok, Fed should be the winner hands down, but besides from him, who do you think has the most resources, who has the most different shots?
     
    #1
  2. joshburger

    joshburger Guest

    fabrice santoro
     
    #2
  3. Element54

    Element54 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    477
    second that
     
    #3
  4. nalbyvsfed

    nalbyvsfed Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    188
    nalbandian or santoro. i think nalbandian..
     
    #4
  5. thejoe

    thejoe Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,712
    Location:
    England
    Fabrice Santoro.
     
    #5
  6. J-man

    J-man Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,053
    Well creative, Santoro
     
    #6
  7. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    Right now Fed's creativity is more like:
    service winner, ue, service winner, ue... (just kidding)
     
    #7
  8. R_Federer

    R_Federer Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    911
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Nadal's creativity is staying back and waiting for the other to hit it long or into the net :p.
     
    #8
  9. S H O W S T O P P E R !

    S H O W S T O P P E R ! Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    In your thredz, stealin ur bukkits
    Santoro ftw. Youtube "Roger Federer Magic- Santoro Style" and you'll agree.
     
    #9
  10. matchmaker

    matchmaker Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    4,040
    Nalbandian, it used to be Rios though.
     
    #10
  11. R_Federer

    R_Federer Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    911
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Ivanovic's curves are pretty creative to me...
     
    #11
  12. austintennis

    austintennis New User

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2008
    Messages:
    9
    Olivier Rochus. When you don't get a single free point, you are 5'4 and you play a one-handed backhand, you better be creative.

    Stepanek is pretty creative, too. Not too many players use the drop shot so often (on surfaces other than clay).

    The French players in general (not including Mathieu - who grew up training in the States)
     
    #12
  13. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    Hum back to the old cliches? Alternately slices, exquisite drop shots, textbook lobs, coming to net after a good serve (he does it often on break point if you have been paying attention), crazy passing shots on the run, splendid overheads, creating sharp angles, fastest footwork to get to normally unreturnable shots, of course most extreme side and top spin ever generated in tennis (EVER) to the point that players say it takes a set and a half to get used to it, and isn't it Federer who said that playing against Nadal was like playing against a player with 2 forehands? That is how lethal his backhand is (advantage of being ambidextrous). Ouf, enough creativity for you?
     
    #13
  14. R_Federer

    R_Federer Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    911
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Chill out lol. Lets just sit back and enjoy the tennis coming up this week.
     
    #14
  15. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    I agree my friend, let's just do that :)
     
    #15
  16. All-rounder

    All-rounder Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    6,301
    Location:
    Transitional era
    nadal is not creative well he may be on clay but as for other surfaces he is not even close
     
    #16
  17. Toxicmilk

    Toxicmilk Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    santoro for sure.

    honorable mention: Nishikori, the fake drop shot at delray beach against blake xD
     
    #17
  18. orangettecoleman

    orangettecoleman Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,208
    Location:
    Mesa, AZ
    Santoro, Nishikori, Murray, Patty Schnyder, Jurgen Melzer
     
    #18
  19. RoddickAce

    RoddickAce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,468
    Battistone brothers
    http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=BzNr90XZ05A
    They have a crazy high jump serve; for groundies, I don't know if they always do this, but one has 2 forehands while the other uses two hands on both shots; they both use a two handled-racquet.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2009
    #19
  20. swedechris

    swedechris Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,072
    tsonga ... stepanek, youzny.
     
    #20
  21. DoubleDeuce

    DoubleDeuce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,288
    Location:
    South
    I assume you are kidding here.

    Either you have it or you don't. Clay or no clay.

    Intelligent people are more creative and usually have more "knowledge" in their profession than non-creative people and Federer in this regard is unmatched. The Originality in his techniques is explained only by a high level of creativity.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2009
    #21
  22. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    Fed has certainly shown 0 creativity vs Nadal on clay. He has actually shown a vast inability to modify his game (the backhand comes to mind) to come up with different answers. (Don't take my word for it, listen to Johnny Mac's commentary at the FO, edifying.)
     
    #22
  23. R_Federer

    R_Federer Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    911
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    It was just last year's FO final. Other than that I think Federer has done a good job against Nadal on clay. He has even beaten him on clay.
     
    #23
  24. DoubleDeuce

    DoubleDeuce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,288
    Location:
    South
    Here we are comparing players based on the level of creativity they have shown over all. Please note that Nadal's success on clay hardly comes from being creative. On clay, several other big factors are at play which mere creativity may not have all the answers for. Clay happens to be a perfect match for Nadal abilities, he is arguabley the best in history on that surface and still the only one who has bested Federer.
     
    #24
  25. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    He has done a good job (but that's because his game is excellent as it is). He hasn't shown a capacity to adapt his play or even his strategy IMO against Nadal. The win in Hamburg was more a case of Nadal "snapping" and becoming out of gas (Nadal had struggled like hell against everyone else during that tournament, he was so washed out) than Federer trying something different. I know Fed fans are gonna yell bloody murder at that but everything we've seen since the Hamburg match certainly seems to prove my point.
     
    #25
  26. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    Nadal is the only challenge Federer has faced since he became # 1 (2004) and he hasn't shown any creativity in finding ways to maintain his superiority at W and improve his chances at FO, (it's Nadal who has consolidated his grip on clay and found ways to be more and more damaging to Fed on grass, so Nadal has been the creative one), in hard court slams Fed has never had to play Nadal so the question never came up.
     
    #26
  27. DoubleDeuce

    DoubleDeuce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,288
    Location:
    South
    I'll have to repeat myself since you seem to be missing the point. Please first take a moment and look at the definition for creativity and the OP's subject of choice and then look at over all creativity these two players have had. Other responders on this thread appear to be on the right track because they have chosen Santoro who is also very creative on the court. Clinging to 1 out of last 6 Wimbledons or Clay surface does not take anything away from Federer creativity.
     
    #27
  28. joshburger

    joshburger Guest

    do u have a video of that?
     
    #28
  29. joshburger

    joshburger Guest

    #29
  30. S H O W S T O P P E R !

    S H O W S T O P P E R ! Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    In your thredz, stealin ur bukkits
    Nikishori's also a pretty creative guy too.
     
    #30
  31. DoubleDeuce

    DoubleDeuce Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,288
    Location:
    South
    This is a very pretty fake drop shot. However, the commentator says " punched it passed Blake". Blake was actually behind the drop point and the baseline, thinking it is a drop shot starting to launch forward.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2009
    #31
  32. vbranis

    vbranis Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,136
    Location:
    Palm Springs, CA
    Santoro, Stepanek, Melzer, Llodra

    For the WTA, it has to be Niculescu, the female version of Santoro.
     
    #32
  33. matchmaker

    matchmaker Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    4,040
    Nice point. That is sometimes an interesting tactic, especially when you have already hit a few droppers and your opponent thinks you are going to hit yet another one and then you just slice it deep.
     
    #33
  34. edmondsm

    edmondsm Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,902
    Location:
    In an in between place.
    I was going to say Stepanek. Very fun to watch that guy play.
     
    #34
  35. DarthFed

    DarthFed Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    I grudgingly give Stepanek a mention..Santoro of course, Nishikori

    Every player has their moments...i've seen Gasquet and Many other do the risky "first second serve" it usually works rather well
     
    #35
  36. NickC

    NickC Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,436
    Location:
    East Coast, USA. Formally Tucson, AZ
    Including that one time when he bageled Nadal in Hamburg? Surely if Nadal was the god you guys all claim him to be, he wouldn't have succumbed to such a humiliation.
     
    #36
  37. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    I've already answered that question in this thread, I'm not gonna do it again.
    As for the thread's question, I guess I would join the majority and agree with Santoro.
     
    #37
  38. morten

    morten Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,333
    Mac..... ;) I don't see much creativity nowadays IMHO
     
    #38
  39. ESP#1

    ESP#1 Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,093
    Nalbandian, more creative than Federer, a way bigger head case too
     
    #39
  40. edmondsm

    edmondsm Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,902
    Location:
    In an in between place.
    Murray is a very creative player IMO.
     
    #40
  41. S H O W S T O P P E R !

    S H O W S T O P P E R ! Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    In your thredz, stealin ur bukkits
    I forgot him.... awesome creativity. He's so creative, someone would watch him and say, "you cannot be serious!"
     
    #41
  42. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    nalbandian and federer...although fed has been struggling a little bit lately and so has bandy
     
    #42
  43. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    I agree, he is.
     
    #43
  44. jelle v

    jelle v Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,978
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    What does that have to to with being creative...? Nothing imo...

    As for the openingspost:
    I'm a huge Federer-fan, but imo Federer isn't that creative anymore.. for example, he used to hit a very short crosscourt backhand slice very often and follow it to the net (not all the timers). I loved that shot, sort of a mix between a backhand slice and a dropshot, he never hits it anymore.

    For me the most creative players are Santoro and Stepanek and for some strange reason Koubek comes to mind.. Gasquet also comes to mind.
     
    #44
  45. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,972
    Location:
    New York
    That was an answer to someone saying Nadal only pushed the ball back (I sort of listed everything else he does...) Sorry if it was off topic.
     
    #45
  46. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    That shot doesn't really work against nadal and murray and also doesn't pay normal dividends versus djokovic. He was punished for using that shot in the
    5th set of the wimbledon final. At this point he is better off without it.

    But it looks like wilander agrees with you overall he also believes fed. has used up his magical shots.
     
    #46
  47. jelle v

    jelle v Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,978
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Well.. that's good to have him on my side.. ;)

    Ever since 2007 i had the feeling that Roger's tennis was all about business.. business of getting to more than 14 Grand Slam. I think it is a result of the pressure, because up till say 8 or 9 slams, the record wasn't really close, but now it is really close and I think maybe he too has only one thing on his mind, and that's breaking the 14 GS record of Sampras. Once Federer get's his 15th slam, i hope we get to see the old Federer again, cause he was more magical to watch than the current Federer.
     
    #47
  48. Bolivian Ace

    Bolivian Ace Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    237
    Wooww, I should have made this a poll. I think Santoro is winning, and Nalbamndian close. Murray IMO is also very creative. But from your discusions and came to my mind that Federer and Nadal are both boring. Ok, GOAT o not, you already now what to expect from them and from their fans. Once you read a Federer-Nadal discusion you read them all.
     
    #48
  49. slicekick95

    slicekick95 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    584
    Location:
    the tennis club
    #49
  50. Fiercer

    Fiercer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    480
    How's Murray creative? In my mind he just another big serving, two handed baseliner. Nothing against Murray. Just that a player like him hardly need to be creative to win.
     
    #50

Share This Page