Who thinks Fed would play better with a 95" racquet?

Discussion in 'Pros' Racquets and Gear' started by Mickey Finn, May 18, 2007.

  1. BounceHitBounceHit

    BounceHitBounceHit Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    6,014
    Location:
    In the moment.
    I am certainly not AGAINST Fed switching frames.....but I will be very suprised if he does. :) CC
     
  2. pow

    pow Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,439
    Exactly! People can't seem to understand that the player behind the frame is what wins the grand slams.

    People are putting too much credit and blame on racquets. In their minds, the next time someone wins a slam, the trophy will be presented to the racquet!
     
  3. Richie Rich

    Richie Rich Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,271
    drak, i understand what you are saying but when sampras himself questions his racquet choice there has to be something there. sure, his game wasn't suited to clay. but the racquet may have exaggerated that. it is a possibility isn't it? i don't think he's making up an excuse.
     
  4. Richie Rich

    Richie Rich Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,271
    see post 285. sampras felt, for some reason, mental or otherwise, that the racquet MIGHT have made a difference. he had regrets for not changing something. those are his thoughts. why should anyone here discount that? who's got a better perspective on the issue than the world's greatest player?
     
  5. Richie Rich

    Richie Rich Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,271
    by the way, in the article, sampras doesn't mention once that he would have changed his style of play. he focussed on the racquet and what benefits that MAY have provided. even his coach mentioned he should try a different racquet and said nothing about changing the way he played.

    if the racquet wasn't the issue why did he chose to focus on talking about racquet choice and not his style of game?
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2008
  6. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,628
    The bigger head size will give him a bigger sweet spot and more power/spin. More room for error/slight miss hits would also be a benefit.
     
  7. Rabbit

    Rabbit G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    12,606
    Location:
    at the bottom of every hill I come to
    I went on to the ATP site last night and put together Sampras' clay court prepartions year by year from 2002 - 1993. The post was unfortnately deleted.

    Sampras averaged 6 matches a year in preparation for the French. Given that it was not even close to being his favorite surface, I don't think this is even close to enough time on the dirt.

    Sampras was also looking past the French every year to....the big W. He was the odds on favorite there and looking to break records. IMO, he thought he had a much better chance at Wimbledon and because of that and clay being so slow, I pretty much think he just dialed in his clay court season. If you look back, he played hard court events and then maybe two clay court events.

    It wasn't that he couldn't win on clay as evidenced by his victory in DC over Kafelnikov in Moscow. But I really believe that his motivation was Wimbledon, not Paris. Further, I think now he realizes that 7 Wimbledons is great, but 1 French and 5 Wimbledons may have made him an undisputable GOAT.

    Why does he blame his racket? Same reason we do. He, like us, would rather look for any other reason than an inward one to blame a failure on. Fact is, his rackets were probably finer tuned to him than most pros and he wouldn't have done as well with a bigger frame. But, then again, Sampras in his prime could probably serve most everyone off the court with anything. Problem was for him, most anyone didn't include Agassi or Kraijcek, or Safin, or whoever was in the top 10. It does no good to beat 6 guys at a Grand Slam...
     
  8. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,628
    That's pure speculation since you are actually looking "inward" from your own perspective. Don't think otherwise. Also, Sampras has talked about age being an issue for his power game, and I'm sure he knows more about his own needs than you do.
     
  9. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    I have to agree (reluctantly) that Sampras repeatedly harping on the advantages of his new bigger racquet is a way of saying that he could have played much better and won the French if he had access to this before. His peers like Courier and commentators repeat it like a parrot, probably to imply it was also the case with them.
     
  10. AlpineCadet

    AlpineCadet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,628
    They obviously were stubborn and stuck with a demanding frame that was taxing on their games. Their hindsight proves that.
     
  11. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    Or they are trying to make themselves look better. "If I had Internet when I was growing up, I would be far more intelligent."
     
  12. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,730
    He wasn't going to change his style of play at that stage of his career, thus, he may have been looking for other "solutions". But that wouldn't have worked anyway as his biggest problem was his style of play, his inability to move on clay as well as the dirtballers, and his blood condition which made him ill suited to playing long grinding matches on slow red clay.

    Some people were just meant to win the French, while others were just not, and it has nothing to do with their racquets. Europeans and South Americans who grew up playing on red clay and learned how to move on the the stuff stand a much better chance of winning the French than someone like Sampras who grew up playing on the hardcourts of Southern California and never felt comfortable moving on clay. Guys like Nadal, Muster, and Kuerten were groomed to win the French from the day they first picked up a racquet. Guys like Sampras, Rafter, and Henman were not. That's just a fact of life and it had nothing to do with their racquets.

    Just ask Roddick or Blake if they think their racquets are the reason they can't get past the early rounds at the French. I'm pretty sure they'll tell you it's the movement.
     
  13. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,730
    Then why didn't Courier also think a bigger racquet would be a benefit for him as well? Wouldn't his baseline bashing style of play benefit him even more? Yet, he still won two French Opens and made the final of a third, and stuck with his 85 sq. in. racquet throughout his entire career and even into the seniors tour (only last year did he finally switch).
     
  14. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    Both of them play with big racquets already, so they are not going to mention that.
     
  15. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Like I said earlier, and rabbit and Breakpoint have pointed out>>> it's an excuse.

    Again, no frame in the history of tennis was going to magically make Sampras a baseline basher. None. ZERO.

    He had to change his style. Period.

    Here is an example for you. When you have a type of opponent you can't beat, lets say a serve and volleyer, do you go to the tennis store and ask them for a list of frames to beat serve and volleyers??? Or if you can't beat a pusher, do you ask them for a list of frames to beat pushers?? The answer is no, because there is no such thing.

    Only way for you to beat these type of players is to change your strategy. Not your frame, or strings, or shoes, or cap.
     
  16. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    Design a new 95 si racquet for Federer to revamp his game

    You need to specify length, static weight, balance, swing weight, composition, string pattern, stiffness.
     
  17. nickb

    nickb Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,292
    Length - 30 inches.
    Weight - 129g unstrung
    Balance - 22.4567801pts head heavy
    Swing Weight - 98
    Composition - 100% AEROGEL
    String pattern - 8 M, 10 C
    Siffness - 345RA
     
  18. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    12.2 oz strung
    27 in
    16 X 19
    8 pts HL strung
    RA 65 strung
    330 strung
    100% graphite
     
  19. nickb

    nickb Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,292
    ^ Too demanding. Mine is much easier to use.
     
  20. djokster

    djokster Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,348
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    GRANNY RACQUET!!!

    lol
     
  21. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,730
  22. s7evin

    s7evin Rookie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Stop posting these ***************** threads which indicates that pro's don't know how, or with what to play tennis!
     
  23. babolat141

    babolat141 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    on a tennis court
    i think a good racket for him would be maby the kblade tour because its a little bigger but not by much. Or the k95
     
  24. s7evin

    s7evin Rookie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    [​IMG]

    This is fed's home now that he read all this stuff, unfortunately he can't fit the racket through the door so he hangs it outside.
    I heard that he's going for the French next year with this baby THE Volkson KDNX Tour 100K90.
     
  25. DarthCow

    DarthCow Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    386
    Thats in Melbourne!
     
  26. s7evin

    s7evin Rookie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    ^Yeah, that is how much these "Fed doesn't know **** about tennis" threads affected him...
     
  27. Cenc

    Cenc Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,267
    Location:
    Croatia
  28. proracketeer

    proracketeer Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    972
  29. origmarm

    origmarm Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,207
    Location:
    London
  30. s7evin

    s7evin Rookie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    LOOL....
    BTW this just might be the new Sampras racket...
    K6.0 90???
     
  31. proracketeer

    proracketeer Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    972
    K6.0 95!!!
     
  32. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    He should start with the stock K95 (make sure it really has stock specs LOL) and proceed from there.
     
  33. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,271
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    or maybe you shuold let the pro decide what the pro wants to use, instead of pretending to know what might possibly work better for him, since you know absolutely everything about federer. right?
     
  34. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Take the ProStaff 6.1 Classic and add an extra string to make it 16 x 19.

    PS6.1 + 16x19 = Best stick EVER!
     
  35. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,730
    Wow!!! Where did you find this? That looks to be a PS 6.0 95 with the K90/K95 paintjob. It's the first time I've seen one. I've seen the PS 6.0 95 with the PS Tour 90/95 and with the nCode 90/95 paintjobs on them and I figured they must have made them with the K90/K95 paintjob too as many people still love this racquet, but this is the first time I've seen it.

    So where can I get one of these? :)
     
  36. proracketeer

    proracketeer Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    972
    Made in China.
     
  37. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    What is the difference between this one and the K95?
     
  38. the Town Sherif

    the Town Sherif Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    528
    round beams first straight beams, flares at the throats versus straight non-flares, weight distribution, thickness in beam...but other than all that, they are exactly the same.
     
  39. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    So what is this racquet? And how can you tell weight distribution from a pic?
     
  40. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,730
    It's a PS 6.0 95 with a K90 paintjob.
     
  41. s7evin

    s7evin Rookie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Belgrade, Serbia
    No, its actually fake K90...(that's how the bay seller advertised it)
     
  42. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    35,762
    So some guy (other than Wilson) painted this as a K90 for fun? Or was it something that Wilson really put out?
     
  43. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,730
    I know that's how he advertises it. But my source tells me that it's actually a REAL PS 6.0 95 with a K90 paintjob.
     
  44. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,730
    Wilson does this for their sponsored pros that want to still play with the PS 6.0 95, just they they paintjob other older racquets with current models' paintjobs. However, I understand that this seller had these paintjobs done by an outside source and not by Wilson.
     
  45. Samperer

    Samperer Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    157
    Location:
    UK
    BP this isnt a PS95. I also bought the same model off the auction site for about £8! Its looking a little worse for wear these days but heres a pic. the beam was about 22m, it weighed about 310 strung and had a 16*19 string (even tho the frame said 16*18!). the bumper/gromet was awful quality and the I dont think the strings had been done on a machine, reckon someone had just pulled them as tight as they could!!!

    [​IMG]
     
  46. Samperer

    Samperer Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    157
    Location:
    UK
    Also this it the only racket that I have (and ever will) break. Dont think it counts as its a fake though!
     
  47. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,730
    Hmmm...but both your pic of your broken racquet and the pic above clearly show a 16x18 string pattern.

    Here's the above pic again:

    [​IMG]
     
  48. Samperer

    Samperer Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    157
    Location:
    UK
    It must have been the other way around then, said 16*19 but actually had 16*18, my point was that it did match. It also came with a very thin/cheap syn grey grip, and a fake almost see through wilson dumbie. the full length case did not even match up to wilsons poor quality control! If i'd have kept it i would have sent it to you to!
     
  49. proracketeer

    proracketeer Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    972
  50. RFRF

    RFRF Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    405
    Location:
    australia
    Great photo, that one of the best tennis stores in the world!!!
     

Share This Page