Who was more damaged at GS by Djokovic - Nadal or Federer?

Who was more damaged at GS by Djokovic?


  • Total voters
    74
Without Djoko, Federer would be the undisputed king of Wimbledon, with 11 titles, which would rank somewhat comparably with Nadal's 14 at RG. And he would also have 9 (including 08, 11 and 16) AO's. Murray would inherit most of the other Djokovic AO titles.

Post-13, Nadal only met Djokovic twice at non-RG slams. So they crossed paths relatively few.
But instead of having just 2 AO and 2 Wimbledon, Nadal would have 4 of each which would make him seen much more well rounded. Plus 5 US open would put him on a level with Sampras.
 
Yep Nadal would have a Quadruple Career Slam. . Fed would still only have 1 French. Nadal hurt Fed more than DJoker ever did
Well nadal is the RG gatekeeper. If it wasn’t for nadal then djokovic and Federer would have been considered the greatest clay court players of all time.

As you said Djokovic stopped nadal from quadrupple career slams and therefore best all around player. Djokovic only stopped Federer in terms of his longevity… but then Federer did win 3 between 2017 and 2018 when djokovic was injured… so Fed did prove his longetivity with that

Meanwhile Fed didn’t really stop nadal and djokovic
 
Last edited:
Top