Who would benefit from a closed-roof Wimbledon Final the most?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by TennisInPleasanton, May 18, 2009.

?

Which player would benefit most from a closed-roof Wimbledon FINAL

  1. Rafael Nadal

    15.7%
  2. Roger Federer

    52.9%
  3. Andy Murray

    11.8%
  4. Novak Djokovic

    3.9%
  5. Andy Roddick

    7.8%
  6. David Nalbandian

    3.9%
  7. Ivo Karlovic

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. Jo-Wilfred Tsonga

    2.0%
  9. Mario Ancic

    2.0%
  10. Other (Make sure to list who you think!)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. TennisInPleasanton

    TennisInPleasanton Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    108
    Just watched the closed-roof Wimbledon special on TV and was wondering throughout the three one-set matches played who would benefit the most from a closed-roof Wimbledon Final.
     
    #1
  2. iamgoat

    iamgoat Banned

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Messages:
    485
    Nadal. He won't be as embarrased to butt-pick, as helicopters will be unable to see him.
     
    #2
  3. crazylevity

    crazylevity Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,978
    Nalbandian. If he makes the final. The roof will fool him into thinking it's indoor carpet, and godly Nalbandian will show up.
     
    #3
  4. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,474
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    The fans in the stadium, because they won't have to sit there in the rain watching no tennis.
     
    #4
  5. Warriorroger

    Warriorroger Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,603
    LOL, right!
     
    #5
  6. Gorecki

    Gorecki G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,225
    Location:
    Puerto y Galgo....
    the people in the stands.. those guys that pay to watch?

    ps: ooops. rhino beat me to the joke!
     
    #6
  7. manny pacquiao P4P king

    manny pacquiao P4P king Banned

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    165
    nalbandian is overrated
     
    #7
  8. joeri888

    joeri888 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,120
    Federer more than Nadal.. and since I think these two will make the final, I would say Federer. nadal is great with wind and stuff. I think that's key for Federer. Nadal has a huge margin for error so can play with wind. Fed a little less. On the other side, the court does get a little wet from a few drops of rain every day, which makes it obviously faster, which would favour Fed, and in that way it will favour Nadal. It will be close again
     
    #8
  9. coloskier

    coloskier Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,539
    To add to this, with the roof closed, the humidity will be higher, making the grass faster and slicker with lower bounces. Advantage Fed.
     
    #9
  10. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,579
    Murray.

    A - because he plays well indoors (7 of his 11 titles are indoors?)

    and

    B - the noise levels would be amplified.
     
    #10
  11. jaggy

    jaggy G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    12,716
    Location:
    Carrboro, NC
    The TV fans as they wont have to listen to inane drivel during rain breaks.
     
    #11
  12. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,579
    Sorry - this is incorrect. One of the reasons the roof took so long to implement was the time it took to develop the 'all-singing all-dancing' climate control system, specifically designed to keep the humidity down and the grass dry.
     
    #12
  13. mzzmuaa

    mzzmuaa Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    421
    If the climate control system was created by british scientists then we can count on having very high indoor humidity.
     
    #13
  14. skip1969

    skip1969 Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,447
    Location:
    Pleasantville
    what an odd topic for a thread. maybe if the final were tomorrow . . . and it was raining in london right now . . . i might understand.
     
    #14
  15. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,362
    i would say federer because guys who have a great serve would serve even better indoor where the wind element is out of the equation.
     
    #15
  16. gj011

    gj011 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,548
    Location:
    Back from prison
    I just hope they would use the roof in a fair manner, based on weather conditions and not based on who is playing on the court at that moment in order to affect the outcome of the matches, like they did it on AO 2009.
     
    #16
  17. shadows

    shadows Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    8,034
    Location:
    England
    Tsonga will destroy someone under it
     
    #17
  18. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,579
    JWT would be strong under the roof - but is he likely to be playing on centre?
     
    #18
  19. shadows

    shadows Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    8,034
    Location:
    England
    depends who he's destroying ;)
     
    #19
  20. tudwell

    tudwell Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,408
    No Sampras on the poll????
     
    #20
  21. batz

    batz G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    14,579
    Touche!

    That's a fair point:)
     
    #21
  22. charliefedererer

    charliefedererer Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,639
    FINAL VERDICT: The roof will give us the best possible chance of letting these fantastic player's skills be on display.

    EYE WITNESS EVIDENCE:
    Who wants to see second rate performances like the wind swept Indian Wells final of Nadal-Murray?
    Who wants to see long rain delays or slippery court conditions on grass? (Yesterday's FO final never could have continued in London.)
    Who wants to have failing light a factor in match outcome? (Yeah, Andy Roddick is such a whiner that any point he had about having to play in the twilight against Monfils was lost, but c'mon, Edisons invention of the lightbulb is not exactly high tech.)
    Scineram recently posted Nadal had to play all 5 days before the 2007 final; hopefully this will be something no future player will have to endure.

    That all being said, the roof would probably help Federer more in a head to head competion against Rafa, as Roger has long maintained that indoor courts are well suited his game that relies on precision with more winners and aces in his tallies. Certainly he already has more than enough problems timing his 1HBH against Nadal's high spinning groundstrokes even when the weather is good. Rog has the bigger serve, a weapon that is easier to control indoors. And despite Fed being in great shape, I would think rain delays forcing more play on consecutive days at the end of the second week would favor the almost unbelievable play that Nadal has exhibited so often, most recently at the AO (though seemingly absent in Madrid where he had to play the very next day). (Although this recent additional news about his knee is disturbing, but hard to know how really serious it is yet.)
     
    #22
  23. Fedace

    Fedace Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    23,292
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Roger probably don't care now. he may just take off this summer. and have a vacation.
     
    #23
  24. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    Regarding the humidity concern I think Wimbledon hadn't installed a roof until now on centre court due to reasons of cost, necessity(TV contracts?) and technology, the technology to create a microclimate which wouldn't cause dew to develop on the grass. We'll find out very soon.

    That said Henman and Agassi said it played fine no problems in the recent 'roof public unveiling' exhibition matches.
     
    #24

Share This Page