Who would win this Wimbledon final?

Discussion in 'Former Pro Player Talk' started by tennisplayer1993, Mar 13, 2013.

?

Roddick or Nadal?

  1. Roddick 2004

    14 vote(s)
    53.8%
  2. Nadal 2007

    12 vote(s)
    46.2%
  1. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    2004 Roddick or 2007 Nadal?
     
    #1
  2. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    bump what do you guys think?
     
    #2
  3. 90's Clay

    90's Clay Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,580
    Nadal for sure
     
    #3
  4. SassyRamirez

    SassyRamirez Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    291
    If it's played on actual fast grass, than Roddick obviously.

    If it's played on slow grass, than probably Nadal; but even then Roddick 2004 would have a good chance of winning.
     
    #4
  5. Rogael Naderer

    Rogael Naderer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    472
    Nadal 2007> Roddick 2004 IMO, could well be a five setter though.


    Roddick 2009 could make mincemeat of Nadal 2007 though...
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2013
    #5
  6. NatF

    NatF G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    14,415
    Location:
    On the road from would of to would have
    Nadal in five sets I'd say.
     
    #6
  7. Flash O'Groove

    Flash O'Groove Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,156
    It would be a close final, but I would give Nadal the edge.
     
    #7
  8. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    Roddick of 2004 was much better than Roddick of 2009. Roddick of 2009 was better than 2006-2008 but still couldnt even beat a very subpar Federer (who Nadal for sure would have beaten had he been able to play that years Wimbledon) in the final.
     
    #8
  9. spinovic

    spinovic Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages:
    4,667
    I'd have to go with Nadal. He pushed Federer to 5 sets in '07. I can't think of any reason to go with ARod in this hypothetical matchup.
     
    #9
  10. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    Even as a Roddick fan, I think this would be true. However, I think it would be a very entertaining match!
     
    #10
  11. mikeespinmusic

    mikeespinmusic Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Messages:
    165
    Roddick 2009 was a mean machine. Even in the slower courts. He finally adapted to them and was probably at his peak. That was heart breaking watching him lost that tie break of wimbledon 2009 against fed. He was never quite the same after that :(

    Im an aussie, but he's my favourite player too. IMO if the courts and balls were never changed the big 4 would've been Roddick, Fed (still a good player in the quick courts) Blake and Hewitt (strangely enough Lleyton favoured fast courts too - He was the aussie version of michael chang, but far more angry and anti social - Blake and Hewitt never got along back in those days because of it. The Aussie's liked Blake more for that reason at the time. Hewitt's nicer and different now that he's totally whipped :p)
     
    #11
  12. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    bump? lol i feel like we could get many opinions on this thread
     
    #12
  13. FD3S

    FD3S Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,180
    I'd say Roddick. While Nadal was rounding nicely into form by this point, he was still vulnerable to big hitters/big servers on fast surfaces, and Roddick in the 04 final was delivering massive pace from everywhere with a surprising amount of consistency. Remember, Fed didn't start winning until he changed his strategy; up until that point he was trying and generally failing to cope with Roddick's power from the baseline, and only after the rain delay did he start chipping and slicing more, making Roddick either have to pass him or come in and hit a lot more volleys then he had earlier in the match. Would Rafa make that adjustment? Possibly, but I'm not sure if he would be able to pull it off as well as Federer did.
     
    #13
  14. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,668
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    I vote for Nadal and his passing shots at Wimbledon, on either the old courts at Wimbledon or the new ones. He plays the critical points far better than Roddick.
     
    #14
  15. TMF

    TMF Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    21,373
    Hard to say. Most of you pick Nadal mainly because he pushed Roger to 5 sets, but remember Nadal was pushed to 5 set by Soderling, who I don't think is as good as Roddick in 2004.
     
    #15
  16. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    Yes great logic, a players form in the 3rd round means more than a players form in the final, the round the hypothetical match would have taken place. More daily genius The Master of Fail logic.
     
    #16
  17. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    To be honest, Roddick seemed like a totally different player with super consistency during that match. I still think in terms of quality tennis (especially his first set), this match was his highest despite losing it.
     
    #17
  18. FD3S

    FD3S Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,180
    I'm of two minds of this - while I concur that this was Roddick's peak in terms of his power-baseline game, the 09 version that played Fed had a markedly improved net/transition game even though his groundies had lost some pace. With that said, I'd probably take 04 Roddick too - I mean, I still honestly think that Fed's the only person who would have beaten him in that final. Even Hewitt - who ate pace off serve and groundstrokes for lunch - would have been hardpressed the way Roddick was hitting and serving.

    Another note I also forgot to throw in regarding the hypothetical match against Nadal - Nadal wouldn't read/return Roddick's serve nearly as well as Federer, and considering even Roddick's second serve was doing significant damage that day...
     
    #18
  19. monfed

    monfed Guest

    How is this even a question? 2004 Roddick would destroy any version of Ralph. Ralph's moonballing won't work against him. Roddick's serves would be whistling past Ralph's ears. :lol:
     
    #19
  20. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    Also Roddick beat Hewitt at Queens that year in a close match. I also think if it wasn't for Federer, Roddick would beat anyone else in the 2004 Wimbledon finals
     
    #20
  21. SassyRamirez

    SassyRamirez Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    291
    Haha.

    10lols
     
    #21
  22. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    What's so funny?
     
    #22
  23. tennisplayer1993

    tennisplayer1993 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2012
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    All Around The World
    any more thoughts? :D
     
    #23
  24. 90's Clay

    90's Clay Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,580
    We are talking SLAM finals here. Roddick was historically not the most level headed player when it came to slam finals. (I can't even count all the brain farts he had vs. Fed over the years in slam finals and with some other guys). Nerves always got the best of Roddick and one way or another he would take jack up a big point.

    Maybe if it was Roddick-Rafa in a QF match or something.. Possibly. But no doubt nerves would get the best of Roddick and Nadal reigns supreme.
     
    #24

Share This Page