Who's better on clay: Muster vs Federer

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Cyan, May 18, 2010.

?

Who is better?

  1. Muster

    17 vote(s)
    27.0%
  2. Federer

    40 vote(s)
    63.5%
  3. Tossup

    6 vote(s)
    9.5%
  1. Cyan

    Cyan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,372
    Who would you vote for?
     
    #1
  2. P_Agony

    P_Agony Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,186
    Nadal.

    10 chars.
     
    #2
  3. Cyan

    Cyan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,372
    What about Vilas vs Federer?
     
    #3
  4. abmk

    abmk G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    15,916
    Location:
    U.S
    borg

    10 chars
     
    #4
  5. viduka0101

    viduka0101 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,329
    Inigo Montoya
     
    #5
  6. Ambivalent

    Ambivalent Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    2,864
    Rezai Rezai
     
    #6
  7. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,640
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    At his very peak, I'd say Muster gets the nod over Federer. Both have one FO title. Looking over several years of play though, the analysis of Federer versus Muster on clay must also involve all the finals Federer has reached at clay tourneys, especially at the French Open.

    Yet, Muster has 40 official clay titles, while Federer has 9 right now. So, how much do you give weight to RG finals reached by Federer vs. the 40 total clay titles of Muster? Then, to try and analyze who would actually be better in a hypo match is completely subjective of course. So, the short answer is that there really is no wrong or right answer here.

    http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tennis/Players/Mu/T/Thomas-Muster.aspx?t=mr
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2010
    #7
  8. Legend of Borg

    Legend of Borg Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,964
    Location:
    Pazardjik, Bulgaria
    I second that.
     
    #8
  9. Cyan

    Cyan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,372
    What about prime Vilas vs prime Fed on clay? Both lost 3 FO finals and won 1 FO.
     
    #9
  10. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,640
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    That's tough to call as well, with the wood racquet era. Vilas is much more accomplished overall on clay. He won the US Open over Connors on rubico (green, fast clay). So, I'd give him the edge if I had to pick between the two. He also had a record streak on clay (since broken by Nadal) and 46 total clay titles vs. only 9 for Federer. I've seen Vilas play in the mid- 1980's on red clay live (when he was well past his prime vs. Pernfors, etc. at River Oaks in Houston). He could hit one handed topspin backhands that could literally push a player back to the backstop. Now, imagine if Federer had to face that with a wood frame in his hands and with his one handed backhand. Think of that dynamic, with no graphite frames involved against Vilas. How do you win points unless you are someone like Borg who could outlast him and who could defend with his two handed backhand.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2010
    #10
  11. davey25

    davey25 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,059
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Peak Muster is easily better than any Federer on clay. However peak Muster only lasted 2 years. The Federer of 2005 until today I would give the edge over any other version of Muster on clay. So I dont know how to answer this poll, it isnt specific enough.
     
    #11
  12. jean pierre

    jean pierre Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    787
    Vilas of course. He won FO, US Open, Rome, Madrid, Monaco, Hambourg, all the big tournaments on clay, beating all the players (except Borg).
     
    #12
  13. Tsonga#1fan

    Tsonga#1fan Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    540
    Location:
    East Coast USA, Puerto Rico
    Muster's one handed backhand would NEVER break down as badly as Federer's does, on clay.
     
    #13
  14. nikdom

    nikdom Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,725
    Location:
    Tennisville
    Looks like he doing the Travolta disco move from Saturday Night Fever. :)

    [​IMG]
     
    #14
  15. Li Ching Yuen

    Li Ching Yuen Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    6,989
    Federer would destroy him in straight-sets.
     
    #15
  16. borg number one

    borg number one Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    7,640
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    ^^No way. Equalized for technology? I don't see that happening. It's so subjective to try and assess, but I've watched both a lot, live and otherwise. Vilas was a beast on clay. Federer would have his hands very full playing Vilas. He may very well lose the majority of matches on clay to him.
     
    #16
  17. Cyan

    Cyan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,372
    Good point.
     
    #17
  18. Bilbo

    Bilbo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    532
    Andres Gomez is, IMO, the best 1 FO having clay courter ever... next to Vilas (but he doesn't count, lol) but, uh, he's not a choice, so ill go with:

    Federer, i mean, really? Is this even a question? The guy would arguably have 3 FO titles if not for the second best clay courter ever...
     
    #18
  19. JeMar

    JeMar Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,698
    I think the clay court game is too different these days for accurate comparisons.
     
    #19
  20. big bang

    big bang Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,885
    Location:
    behind your curtain
    Im confused here:confused:
     
    #20
  21. davey25

    davey25 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,059
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Federer would probably have 4 French Open titles without Nadal. 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2009. However the clay court field without Nadal would be the biggest joke in history. It would be even worse than the grass court field today.
     
    #21
  22. paulorenzo

    paulorenzo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,587
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    if nadal wasn't here for the past few years on clay, the clay field would have been considered a lot more "competitive" since no one would dominate the surface. see the allusion i've presented?
     
    #22
  23. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,112
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    If we're talking peak for peak on clay, then Thomas Muster.

    On top of 1 French Open each, Muster has also won 3 Monte Carlos and 3 Romes, tournaments that Federer has never managed to win. As far as Hamburg goes, Muster never played it during his peak.
     
    #23
  24. fed_rulz

    fed_rulz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,621



    and whose fault is that? And muster's peak lasted for all of 1 yr -- the yr he won the RG. Plus Muster did not have any one of the caliber of nadal to contend with;
     
    #24
  25. World Beater

    World Beater Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,751
    in a one match situation..muster was certainly amazing.

    but got to give props to rodge to keep fighting every year at RG even though he lost to nadal again and again. Federer showed tremendous heart to win in his 4th final.

    muster never had to deal with federer's pressure. Muster also did not have longevity.

    over the course of their career...federer. but a peak muster won more, but to a certain degree was less dominant. sounds strange...but muster didnt crush everyone. he had tough matches. federer pretty much owned the competition except nadal for some time.
     
    #25
  26. Justdoit10

    Justdoit10 Guest

    Muster was good but he doesnt trump Federer on clay by any means. He made 1 RG final and he faced Michael Chang in it. Federer made big runs at RG for 5 years and lost to Nadal in the late stages of that event 4 times.

    Its funny how people bring up this Nadal head to head all the time when berating Federer of his possible GOAT status. lol I would love to see pete sampras's head to head against Nadal with 12 meetings on clay.:lol:

    Make no mistake? Nadal's h2h over federer is amazing and deserves all the praise it gets but saying that Federer is a 'mentally weak midget who cant even beat his main rival' is excessive. Nadal is so good on clay that he will skew any h2h in his favor through 12 clay meetings.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 18, 2010
    #26
  27. dropshot winner

    dropshot winner Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,852
    True.

    But Muster's forehand, serve, slice and netgame are nowhere near Federer's. Even Federer's movement on clay is at least as good Muster's.

    Federer can afford hitting 20 backhand errors against most because he compensates them with great serves, and amazing forehand winners.
     
    #27
  28. Hitman

    Hitman G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    11,898

    Great post! This is exactly what I think too.
     
    #28
  29. Halba

    Halba Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,354
    muster for sure. back then those titles were very valuable, not to be sneezed at. now masters are sneezed at by top players like federer.
     
    #29
  30. Li Ching Yuen

    Li Ching Yuen Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    6,989
    This is the correct answer to any of these threads.

    Federer's footwork is about a hundred billenias ahead of what anyone of those "past" greats could ever dream of or could even comprehendedly imagine.
     
    #30
  31. big bang

    big bang Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,885
    Location:
    behind your curtain
    LOL, just LOL!
     
    #31
  32. Mustard

    Mustard Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    25,112
    Location:
    Cwmbran, Wales
    Muster's peak was February 1995 - March 1997.

    In this 25 month period, Muster won 21 titles, 18 of them on clay:

    1995 Mexico City (Clay)
    1995 Estoril (Clay)
    1995 Barcelona (Clay)
    1995 Monte Carlo Masters (Clay)
    1995 Rome Masters (Clay)
    1995 French Open (Clay)
    1995 St. Poelten (Clay)
    1995 Stuttgart Outdoor (Clay)
    1995 San Marino (Clay)
    1995 Umag (Clay)
    1995 Bucharest (Clay)
    1995 Essen Masters (Indoor Carpet)
    1996 Mexico City (Clay)
    1996 Estoril (Clay)
    1996 Barcelona (Clay)
    1996 Monte Carlo Masters (Clay)
    1996 Rome Masters (Clay)
    1996 Stuttgart Outdoor (Clay)
    1996 Bogota (Clay)
    1997 Dubai (Hardcourt)
    1997 Miami Masters (Hardcourt)
     
    #32

Share This Page