why borg 6FO acheivements are not mentioned as often as his 5 conseutive WImbledon

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by makhan10, May 8, 2009.

  1. makhan10

    makhan10 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    370
    winning the same Grand Slam 6 times is not an easy task, an acheivement matched only by Sampras (7 Wimbledon) during open era.
     
    #1
  2. helloworld

    helloworld Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,670
    Because winning Wimbledon 5 times is more impressive. Heck, winning Wimbledon once can make somebody a legend, eg. Ivanisevic, Stich, Cash, Krajicek, etc.
     
    #2
  3. wow246

    wow246 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Because WIMBLEDON is WAAAY OVER-RATED. In terms of quality of matches you would definitely have to put the AO/UO ahead of wimbledon.

    There is only had full of wimbledon matches that ppl remember. But being the oldest tournament it gets more hype.

    And for borg's case becsue he had to adapt to grass right after clay which back when the grass courts WERE FAST was quite hard to do.
     
    #3
  4. rafan

    rafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,212
    This is not true. Wimbledon in the past with its weather and unpredicatble surface ( I mean the times we have hot summers) has been by far the hardest tournament to win. If you have ever been there you will know it is also the most impressive and can be extremely intimindating for any newcomer . People will refer to and remember a good Wimbledon final long after it is over. Nadal has now won on all surfaces but look at his reaction to winning Wimbledon - he went over the top. I thought in contrast winning in Australia was very tame
     
    #4
  5. wow246

    wow246 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Only reason it was tame was because nadal knew he had AO in the bag after fed collapsed in final set. So the feeling already sunk in.

    Where as at wimbledon 08 he had to fight till the very last point. Remember federer saved number of match points so i guess feelings all the more sweeter when your not sure if your goign to win or not!!!!
     
    #5
  6. BorisBeckerFan

    BorisBeckerFan Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,164
    Prestige wise nothing compares to Wimbledon. Unless something unforeseen happens, nothing ever will. Overrated or not that's just how it is. It would take a lot to change that perception among the players and fans.
     
    #6
  7. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,429
    Because winning 5 straight Wimbledons is much, much harder and much more impressive and much more recognized the world over than just winning a bunch of French Opens. :shock:

    Just ask Federer and Nadal. ;) LOL
     
    #7
  8. Bloodshed

    Bloodshed Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Orléans, Canada
    Because Borg won 5 Wimbledon in a row while he won 6 FO on different occassions (4 in row and then 2 in a row)

    That's why if Nadal wins RG this year, he will write history for not the amount of RG but for winning 5 in a row.
     
    #8
  9. rafan

    rafan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,212
    Yes and if it hadn't rained and Fed had time to rest would it have been in 3 straight sets to Nadal
     
    #9
  10. sh@de

    sh@de Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,979
    Because Wimby >>> FO in most people's opinions. If you ask me as a tennis fan, I would probably say so too, but then, if I were given a choice, I WOULD NOT MIND winning either. Even if it were just once. I wouldn't care whichever slam it were. :p.
     
    #10
  11. Winners or Errors

    Winners or Errors Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,501
    Because, for some reason, a tournament played on a surface that almost no tournaments are played on anymore garners more nostalgia.

    Seriously, I put the French, Wimbledon, and the US Open on the same level. The Australian, well, even with the shift to January to get all the top players there, it still feels like a second tier major... I don't know why.
     
    #11
  12. wow246

    wow246 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    I don't know about second tier. I personally believe majority of the funnest matches to watch over the last decade HAVE BEEN PLAYED AT AO!!!

    For eg if u grab a non tennis fan make him watch fed vs nadal wimbledon 08 or nadal vs verdasco 09 and ask him which one was more exciting 100% guarantee the would say nadal/verdasco. Obviously tennis fans know what was at steak at wimbledon 08 and that is why it is regarded and probably the greatest match, but to the casual observer or people you are trying to suck into tennis the AO matches would be the one's to show. Also playing in 40degreed heat AO is probably the most physically demanding tournament too!!!
     
    #12
  13. 080825

    080825 New User

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    38
    Because nobody has come close to break it, untill Rafa has a chance this year. Borg's Wimbledon record was challenged by Pete (4+3) and Roger (5). So Wimbledon got more hype.
     
    #13
  14. Pirao

    Pirao Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    Spain
    Good point. Records get more on the spotlight when people get close to breaking them.
     
    #14
  15. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,540
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    Because it's bloody Wimbledon.

    And that's all we need to say :)
     
    #15
  16. seffina

    seffina G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    11,635
    Basically!
     
    #16
  17. veroniquem

    veroniquem Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30,967
    Location:
    New York
    Why do you think that? I've heard about his 6 RG titles many many times. IMO they are mentioned quite a lot.
     
    #17
  18. Arafel

    Arafel Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,153
    Well, for one, it's because he won five in a row. For another, it's Wimbledon.

    More importantly, it was the quality of the finals at Wimbledon and the opposition. Twice against Connors, one of which went to five glorious sets. Once against Nastase. Once against an absolutely on fire Tanner, who took Borg to five sets. Twice against McEnroe, both of which were awesome matches.

    Who did he play in his French finals? Orantes, Vilas twice, Gerulaitis, Pecci and Lendl. Orantes and Lendl pushed it to five, though it never seemed in doubt against Lendl. Pecci won one set in a breaker, though the rest were rather pedestrian. Vilas got crushed both times, as did Gerulaitis.

    The French finals didn't have the edge-of-your seat tension that his Wimbledon and US Open finals did.
     
    #18
  19. THUNDERVOLLEY

    THUNDERVOLLEY G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    10,509
    Agreed. I've seen over 30 years of FO finals and not once did the finals compare to even some great semis at Wimbledon and the US Open.
     
    #19
  20. NLBwell

    NLBwell Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,112
    I believe it is because Borg was originally seen as a clay-courter who would have no shot at Wimbledon (like Nadal). He changed his game - improved his serve, came to the net often, etc. and was able to win Wimbledon not using just his natural game (which eluded Lendl). While Nadal hasn't had to change his game, he has made significant improvents in his serve, volleying, and general aggresiveness to become a good enough grass-court player to win it.
     
    #20
  21. egn

    egn Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,973
    simple ask 100 people who know little about tennis to name a tennis tournament..watch how many say wimbledon. It holds the prestige factor..even Nadal wanted to win wimbledon badly.
     
    #21

Share This Page