Why did Wilson make the nCode nSix-One 95 with a 22mm beamwidth?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by djones, Jan 4, 2006.

  1. djones

    djones Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,783
    This really bothers me.
    In my opinion players racquets shouldn't be more than 20mm in beamwidth, at the max maybe 21mm.
    But 22mm is just to clumsy!

    Also the Head LM Prestige MP and LM Radical Tour are both stated as 21mm, but it's obvious that the Prestige is slightly thinner, and this is very noticable.
    I actually believe, that the Head LM Radical Tour and Dunlop 300G are both closer to 22mm than 21mm, it might be just 1 mm, but to me it's a lot!
     
    #1
  2. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,754
    Wider beams usually translates into more power, and the nSix-One 95 is indeed a pretty powerful racquet. That's why Wilson made it 22mm. If you want a thinner racquet, get the nSix-One Tour at 17mm (feels more like 18mm to me), but you'll have to live with the much lower power level.
     
    #2
  3. La Bomba

    La Bomba Professional

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    892
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    BreakPoint, i think the beam on the ncode 90 is actually 17.5mm, i may be wrong but a shop owner told me it was.
     
    #3
  4. BreakPoint

    BreakPoint Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    43,754
    OK, maybe it's 17.5mm, but I'm just saying that it feels a bit thicker than the PS 6.0 85 which indeed has a 17mm beam. I think we're splitting hairs here.
     
    #4
  5. You can pick up a micrometer.

    It could be, or it could look like it because the frame is not as boxy as the 6.0 85. Don't fat guys look ever-so-slightly taller than they are? Or not . . .

    I would think Wilson made the nCode 95 at 22mm because that's the beam width of the Hyper 6.1 and Classic 6.1. In other words, Wilson, like Head, for whatever reason(s) wanted to use the same or similar mold.
     
    #5
  6. djones

    djones Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,783
    #6
  7. meh

    meh Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    Messages:
    769
    Wilson used the same mold for the HPS and PSC, so the beam width is the same 22mm. Ncode has a different mold, I think.
     
    #7
  8. Keifers

    Keifers Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,119
    I agree that 22mm feels clumsy. I get a sense of precision when I swing frames below 20mm that feels really good.
     
    #8
  9. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    6,156
    Simply stated, Wilson does not share your opinion. Nor do many others. The list of racquets with beams of 23 to 25 mm. used by top pros and collegians is lengthy and is likely familiar to you. Maybe it's not players' racquets that should have a thin beam, but beginner and game-improvement sticks, as some complain that they "frame" balls with wider sticks, presumably reflecting timing problems with the swing, something more prevalent in beginners and intermediates.
    ________
    California Medical Marijuana
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2011
    #9
  10. Keifers

    Keifers Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,119
    Perhaps you can help out here, ollinger. What is the beam width of your HPS 6.1 OS? And do you know if it's the same as that of the MP version? Thanks.
     
    #10
  11. jediknightdan

    jediknightdan New User

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    57
    I use a nSix-One 95, and it is indeed a powerful racquet. Its has good feal and i tryed out the fpr and it did not work ar feal as good as the n61
     
    #11
  12. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    6,156
    As I recall the specs, HPS 6.1 OS is a 22 mm. straight beam.
    ________
    Web Shows
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2011
    #12
  13. iscottius

    iscottius Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,146
    if you don't like the beam width play the 6.0 original it is very similiar in design with a 20mm beam
     
    #13
  14. Keifers

    Keifers Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,119
    djones, that's a great suggestion from iscottius. Have you ever tried the 6.0 95? 20mm plus a number of other very nice playing characteristics (touch, feel, control, maneuverability). Definitely lower-powered than the n61, though.
     
    #14

Share This Page