Why do so many players choose to receive?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Tchocky, May 5, 2008.

  1. Tchocky

    Tchocky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,815
    Location:
    The OC
    I've noticed on clay, many players choose to receive after they have won the coin toss as opposed to serving to start the match. I know a big serve doesn't mean as much on clay versus a faster surface but I still don't understand the logic. What are your thoughts? Do you elect to receive when you play on clay versus faster surfaces?
     
    #1
  2. ilovecarlos

    ilovecarlos Professional

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,208
    Location:
    at the Bistro
    I think there are several reasons for this. First, to get a feel for the court. Second, some players feel that their return game is strong and may have a better chance at an early break while their opponent has early match nerves. Just my most humble guesses
     
    #2
  3. el sergento

    el sergento Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,198
    Location:
    Montreal
    Because on clay, serving first is almost a disadvantage.
     
    #3
  4. Blade0324

    Blade0324 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    3,569
    I can't specifically speak to clay but I always choose to receive or choose a side if I win the coin toss. I rarely run into someone that chooses not to serve if they win so basically I always get to receive first. My logic is this, if they hold serve, no big deal I'm not out anything and it gives me a chance to work in to the match a bit before I have to serve. If I break them first then all I have to do is play smart and continue to hold serve to take the first set. I have a good serve and don't loose if too often so getting an early break when your opponent has early match nerves can be an advantage. Just my theories but it works for me.
     
    #4
  5. boredone3456

    boredone3456 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,005
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    I gotta agree with ilovecarlos, its to get the early edge. when you serve first to start a match you are the pace setter, and at the begining of a match you are always a bit nervous also, so yeah by choosing to recieve you are saying you plan to try and be agressive and try to get the early break before your opponent can get fully into their rhythm. plus if you have a poor serve ( like dementieva for instance), and you get that early break, it takes a little pressure of you because you have the leway of getting broken and still being even.
     
    #5
  6. Vision84

    Vision84 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    That is a good way of thinking. Personally I like to serve first as I like to be ahead in the set and put the pressure on my opponent to serve well.
     
    #6
  7. fantom

    fantom Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,542

    That's exactly what Brad Gilbert says in his book. You must have read it.
     
    #7
  8. Serpententacle

    Serpententacle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,561
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    I think I read or heard somewhere, so this is hearsay, that Nadal likes to return first because he likes to triumph over disadvantage. He thrives on coming back from being down.

    Not sure this is a good reason, though...
     
    #8
  9. samprasbackhand

    samprasbackhand Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    461
    Because there's nothing worse than getting broken the first game of the set..
     
    #9
  10. BallzofSkill

    BallzofSkill Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Messages:
    801
    'tis better to receive than to give.
     
    #10
  11. Cup8489

    Cup8489 Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,238
    Location:
    Silvis, IL
    yeah, confidence murderer.

    in my own experience i prefer serving first, because for some reason my lefty serve causes huge trouble for people i play, and if i hold and then break them (happens if it's an even match, because they tend to be dismayed by my easy opening hold) and then hold again, i'm all of a sudden up 3-0 without much effort.

    but at these high levels of pro tennis, recieving allows you to warm up and get used to the match without any risk of a big penalty.
     
    #11
  12. West Coast Ace

    West Coast Ace G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,478
    Location:
    So Cal
    You beat me to it.

    I haven't noticed that many players electing to receive - only players with weak serves. I personally think only big servers on fast tracks should serve if they win the toss. Everyone else should receive.


    http://www.angrybackhand.com
     
    #12
  13. Tempest344

    Tempest344 Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,221
    Location:
    Sydney
    because they all recieve a complementary copy of Winning ugly


    *edit* someone beat me to it.... ah well
     
    #13
  14. Andres

    Andres G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    12,541
    Location:
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
    You mean, only players with a strong return game? ;)
     
    #14
  15. Babb

    Babb Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,447
    Location:
    Now down to 4 feet behind the baseline.
    Everyone and their mom beat me to it. It's in the tennis bible.
     
    #15
  16. thejackal

    thejackal Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,885
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    like gilbert said, if u recieve, losing the first game ain't losing
     
    #16
  17. BounceHitBounceHit

    BounceHitBounceHit Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,946
    Location:
    In the moment.
    Ever read Brad Gilbert's "Winning Ugly"? ;) CC
     
    #17
  18. Mansewerz

    Mansewerz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,164
    Location:
    Caught in No Man's Land
    Yep, that's where I heard about it. Well, from summaries on this board.
     
    #18
  19. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427
    if u serve first, u can wrap up the set faster.
     
    #19
  20. serve/and/volley

    serve/and/volley Rookie

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    287
    #20
  21. bad_call

    bad_call Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,437
    in the past, i employed that same logic for a good number of matches. sometimes it worked, others it didn't but then the outcome could have been the same if i served. today would probably elect to serve.
     
    #21
  22. HoVa

    HoVa Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Messages:
    296
    Lets put it this way. If i was up against Roddick or Sampras, I would take my chances and serve first.
     
    #22
  23. origmarm

    origmarm Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,207
    Location:
    London
    #23
  24. 35ft6

    35ft6 Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,557
    If you're nervous at the beginning of the match, it might be better to receive. On my first return game, I would go for winners on the first two returns. Figured why not? If they fall in, I'm looking at an early break, and even if they go out, it felt good to just hit the nerves out.
     
    #24
  25. the_flying_wallaby

    the_flying_wallaby New User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    77
    Location:
    use your imagination, and be sure to throw pants a
    Behind you 100%. I have a great serve that will win me alot of points, and set up alot of easy winners. Recieving first helps to knock out the nerves and helps me alot during the rest of the match.
     
    #25
  26. Not fulltime player

    Not fulltime player New User

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    Messages:
    58
    Many claycourters are deffending players or at least have developed deffence skils, and recieving is fine for counter-punching.
     
    #26
  27. nytennisaddict

    nytennisaddict Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    921
    Location:
    Westchester (lower), NY
    Because my serve sucks (I always choose to receive first when possible)!

    I look at receiving first a "1 game pass" to get settled into the match. My opp is expected to win their serve, so if they do that's fine, and hopefully I'm a bit better grooved (mentally and physically) for when it comes time for me to serve.

    The only exception is when I'm able to get alot of serve warm up (ie. 10+ min) prior to starting and I feel like I'm "on", then in the hopes I won't lose my rhythm I'll elect to serve first (but this never usually happens).
     
    #27
  28. Captain

    Captain New User

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    13
    samprasbackhand??????
    It is MUCH worse to be broken in the LAST game of a set than the first!!!
    Just think about it.
     
    #28
  29. Duzza

    Duzza Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Messages:
    6,315
    Location:
    Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    I play on en tout cas and mostly choose to receive for these reasons:

    I get a little bit more of a warmup returning serves and I have no pressure to win the game like I shoulda service game.

    Might be able to get an early break and apply some pressure.

    Always serving down the side they just did (which helps me if they are having problems with the sun and what not)
     
    #29
  30. Blade0324

    Blade0324 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    3,569
    A number of you have mentioned Brad Gilbert having the same ideas that I mentioned. While I do know who it is I didn't realize he has a book. What is the name of it and where can it be found I'm curious to see what else is there if it states some things with respect to this that I have already adapted then it may have other good insight as well.
     
    #30

Share This Page