Why doesn't FEDERER direct EVERYTHING and NADAL'S BACKHAND??

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by wow246, Mar 10, 2009.

  1. wow246

    wow246 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Given nadal's backhand is better than federer's still it's not as good as his forehand. Federer should use nadal's tactic against hit EVERYTHING towards his backhand.

    ANy thoughts????
     
    #1
  2. FlamEnemY

    FlamEnemY Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,554
    Because he can't.
     
    #2
  3. Yan Man

    Yan Man New User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    95
    actually on faster surfaces it seems like Nadal's backhand catches fire everytime he plays Federer
    i don't know if it would be the best play when Nadal can hit ridiculous cross-court backhand winners against fed on hard/grass. On clay Fed would be hard pressed to get the upper hand in the rally and be able to direct balls to Nadal's BH.
    If you watch the Wimby '08 and AO '09 finals you'll probably see why it isn't necessarily the best idea (which sucks because as a Fed fan, seeing that makes me realize that there goes one tactic that might help him win the match)
     
    #3
  4. edmondsm

    edmondsm Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,902
    Location:
    In an in between place.
    Since the ball is always headed to Fed's bh, that would mean taking the bh down the line. It's a low percentage shot, and he would make alot of errors. If he was going to attack Nadal's bh then he would have to start running around his forehand alot. He SHOULD do this, but he never does for some reason.
     
    #4
  5. counter_puncher

    counter_puncher Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    859
    Nadal's backhand is almost if not as good as his forehand.
    Watch AO 09 Final for proof.
     
    #5
  6. Blinkism

    Blinkism Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,598
    In your opinion, people, what is Nadal's biggest weakness that Federer can exploit? I mean, Nadal's already unlocked Federer's secret, which is high-rising topspin shots to his backhand.

    Is Nadal's weakness his serve, maybe? It seems that whenever Fed gets an upperhand in one of Nadal's service games, one of two things happen; he doesn't capitalize on the break point, or nadal steps up his first serve and even hits aces at critical times.

    Maybe Fed should take Nadal to the net, try some drop shots? Anyone have any ideas or figured out a simple answer to what is Nadal's biggest weakness?
     
    #6
  7. carlos djackal

    carlos djackal Professional

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,246
    Location:
    near a tennis court
    it is but it has been overlooked or underrated.....
     
    #7
  8. MrBen

    MrBen Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    128
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    He can't because Nadal is often so in control of a point that Federer doesn't have time to. Also, Nadal's backhand is not a weak, inconsistent shot.
     
    #8
  9. TheNatural

    TheNatural Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,879
    because Nadal dictates the matches between them and Fed is forced to play reactive tennis.


    Feds problem is he thinks his backhand is better than what it actually is. His other problem is he hasn't evolved his net game.
     
    #9
  10. tahiti

    tahiti Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    840
    Although Nadal doesn't always produce sharp down the line shots, he still manages to keep his opponent on the run constantly when he's in charge of the rally. Fed runs around his bh if he has the time but he does not have the time to run around both his bh and fh.

    Allthough Nadal s.t. errs on his bh side, he also produces amazing cross court winners. It's a solid shot. Fed has tried bringing Rafa to the net, but it's 50/50 there. Rafa catches on to the drops, he's quick, his volleying is improving and any short ball he's put away for a winner.

    If Fed has the shots and he still can't win then it's his defensive game he has to work on. He never really had any severe competition before Nadal and so it was easy to dictate. Now when he is being directed his game falls apart just through UFE count. Nadal learnt to beat Federer by defending. Maybe Federer should use the same tactic.
     
    #10
  11. origmarm

    origmarm Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,207
    Location:
    London
    Because Nadal's forehand is basically as good as his backhand. Remember that he's a righty that plays lefty.

    I agree with Yan Man earlier also, it seems that when he plays Fed on hard surfaces or grass of late it may actually be BETTER than his forehand
     
    #11
  12. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    New York City
    Why doesn't Federer just do this when he plays Nadal:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpflSU_Yvps

    The dude used to slap winners out of nowhere. He doesn't do that anymore and it's not really because of Nadal.
     
    #12
  13. jmverdugo

    jmverdugo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,971
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Fed did this in the first sets of the AO final. There were several dtl rallys FH to BH.
     
    #13
  14. origmarm

    origmarm Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,207
    Location:
    London
    For sure true but then I do think Nadal would actually have got to about half of those. Old Agassi just doesn't retrieve like new Nadal :). Fed has no confidence at the moment and it shows, he has flashes but he can't sustain it like he used to
     
    #14
  15. wow246

    wow246 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Buuut the thing u have to remember is nadal started attacking fed's backhand from the time when it was still a goooooood shot. He slowly broke it down over the course of almost 2 years. SO feds gota start sometime doing something different may as well start now.

    It might not bring any results first few times like it didn't for nadal except during clay seasons but surely enough he broke it down to the level that it is at the moment where even murray us able to beat him by attacking it!!!!
     
    #15
  16. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    New York City
    Agree about the no confidence thing, but I don't think Nadal would have gotten to too many of those. They come absolutely out of nowhere. I totally respect Nadal's speed and defense but those forehands (and probably the backhands) are just other-worldly. Federer just isn't in that zone anymore.
     
    #16
  17. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    New York City
    You talk about his backhand as if it's an old apartment building. Nadal didn't physically alter Fed's backhand. You are either confident in hitting the shot or you aren't. The heavy topspin doesn't help his cause though.
     
    #17
  18. wow246

    wow246 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    All im trying to say is that the state that feds backhand is in now if largely due to nadal peppering it every time they met in like the last 3 years. He's slowly lost confidence in his backhand to a point where now murray hits everything at it and wins matches. That mental block comes back for federer when someone constantly hits at it. Making that shot more worse in matches than it actually is.
     
    #18
  19. caulcano

    caulcano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    I think one of Nadal's (and many other players) weaknesses is his reaction time. What I mean is hit shots down the middle at the opponent (includes rallies & serves).
     
    #19
  20. mental midget

    mental midget Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,434
    nadal's backhand is unlikely to ever break down. it's a very controlled, powerful shot with his natural dominant hand.

    his forehand, as ridiculously good as it is, has more moving parts, and requires just a little more time. hard shots to that side are more likely to yield an attackable ball, imo.

    easier said than done, of course.
     
    #20
  21. rubberduckies

    rubberduckies Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,254
    LOL. Why doesn't Federer just play like his own highlight reel?

    If any top 50 player were actually able to play like his highlight reel, that guy would be #1 in the world with a calendar slam.
     
    #21
  22. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    I'll agree with all of this--is it just confidence that he lacks, in your opinion?
     
    #22
  23. breadstick

    breadstick Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    236
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Federer needs to S&V more. Sure Nadal makes crazy passing shots, but Federer just needs to take it to the next level.

    The longer the rallies, the better for Nadal.
     
    #23
  24. ESP#1

    ESP#1 Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,093
    Nadals heavy topspin gives Federer problems would be my guess not allowing him to dictate points as he would like. So what is Federer to do? Attack Nadals serve, run around the backhand and hit the big forehand. He's too defensive when he has break points, he needs to fire the return ie blake on break points. This would take some of the pressure off his service games and allowing him to relax and play his game
     
    #24
  25. Andyk028

    Andyk028 Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    815
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    Because all Federer can really do most of the timeis defend Nadal's groundstrokes (when they are hit to his backhand side). With most players, he can usually run around the other side and get back into attacking position, but Nadal's bite on the ball is too ballistic to get underneath quick enough.
     
    #25
  26. Fedace

    Fedace Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    23,292
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Nadal has become very adapt at hitting his backhand down the line to Roger's backhand. and then Roger can't really hit his backhand crosscourt with authority. so then Nadal now has a easy mid court forehand that he can dictate with.
     
    #26
  27. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    New York City
    Maybe you didn't watch a lot of Federer in 05-06. He seemed to always play like a highlight reel. That's my point. That is what he is capable of doing.

    Plus, even if you look at his highlight reels from this year and last year, they pale in comparison to 2005, for example. Or look at his highlights from AO 2007, where he didn't drop a set. He was playing out of his mind. Sure, he's still making slam finals, but he isn't slapping winners as casually as he once did. There is a marked difference in confidence.
     
    #27
  28. RalphNYC

    RalphNYC Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    656
    Pros at my club think that the best play against Nadal is to hit deep down the middle to cut off Nadal's insane angles. But as usual, easier said than done...
     
    #28
  29. jackson vile

    jackson vile Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,827
    You make some good points here.

    #1 Better returns, but that will mean either A)better back hand or B)running around back hand.
    -The problem that ends up happening here is that Roger is simply not fit enough to work that hard on the court.

    #2 Drop shots, I would love to see this could help a lot
    -biggest reason people like Nadal and Murray match up so well with Roger is that they are content to keep the point going and will simply keep pushing the ball back makeing Roger do all the work

    #3 Utilizing serve better, now better can mean many many things, but for Roger we would be talking about overal speed/force. Nadal is not fooled by Rogers serve very often like other players and reads it quite well further more is able to handle the different spins Roger gives on the balls.
    -Problem here is that Roger does attempt to do this and his serve percentage goes right down the drain and he also ends up working to hard again.

    #4 Going to Nadal's back hand, what makes it difficult here is that Nadal's bachand lives on power, the more power you hit to Nadal's back hand the stronger the back hand you have to deal with.
    -So if Roger can do what Murray can do ie push some shots and then power other shots this would through Nadal off a lot and the backhand would not be such a weapon.
     
    #29
  30. jackson vile

    jackson vile Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    9,827

    And the reason is that the new top palyers are not allowing him to do that.

    The only reason that Roger was ever able to paly that way was because those palyers were lesser players and still are and IMO always were.

    We saw at the AO 09 Roger vs Roddick, same thing Roger was reeling it up.
     
    #30
  31. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    good post.

    regarding point 4: I will say that nadal will have no trouble dealing with federer pushing to nadal's backhand. Nadal has excellent control of the ball and will have no trouble directing another ball back down the line to federer's backhand. Nadal is mentally stable and not silly enough to take an unnecessary risk and go cross court to federer's forehand off a slow deep ball imo.

    regarding pont 1: federer has a lot of difficulty running around the backhand. Federer not only has to jump to his left, but he also has to fend off a ball that keeps moving into his body; his preferred forehand also uses the longest part of the court (the diagonal) which gives one of the fastest guys on the tour, who also has very good hands (unlike mofils for example), more time to track down the ball.

    Unfortunately there is no one easy solution to nadal. Federer will likely have to get better on many dimensions. The most important thing to remember is that nadal will still improve (the serve, the return of serve, the backhand on faster surfaces). This is a dynamic rivalry and federer has been losing ground for a while.
     
    #31
  32. devila

    devila Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,749
    Nadal didn't need to improve his backhand because he has great center
    of gravity, and side to side arm stretch and flexibility.
    Federer's mediocrity is exposed before he realizes that he's overrated.
    That's why he humiliatingly cried on John McEnroe and Nadal's shoulder.
    That wasn't his sign of big humanity; it was the end of comfort to his self-grandiose world. Add to that, his politically correct trainwreck pal Roddick's self-destruction and worship for him created Fed's sense of entitlement.

    Fed's movement backwards and forward is mediocre. His net play is bad, if he has to rush and stretch overhead. You can serve with a high toss, and
    he's totally hapless. It's like his ******* worshipper Blake, but Fed's taking his own bad medicine.
     
    #32
  33. Clydey2times

    Clydey2times Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,511
    I don't think Federer is particularly tactically astute. He is so good that he figures that if he plays well, he'll win regardless of what his opponent does. That's clearly not the case now. I've always questioned the logic in playing crosscourt to Nadal's forehand every time or Murray's backhand. Why on earth would you keep playing to someone's strength when they are killing you with it by pounding your weakness? It's almost an issue of pride. He doesn't want to be seen compromising and admitting that his backhand isn't good enough. If he plays down the line, he not only forces his opponent to go for a riskier play up the line, but he increases his chances of getting a cross court reply onto his forehand. I find it insane that he hasn't adopted this tactic.
     
    #33
  34. stormholloway

    stormholloway Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    New York City
    How can you possibly prove that? We're talking about hitting unretrievable winners from anywhere on the court. When he was able to do that, it really didn't matter whom he was playing. If you watch the clip of him vs Agassi at the USO in 2005 for example, he's hitting winners even when he's at a disadvantage.

    I just disagree with this outlook. Isn't it possible that Federer was better in those days AND the competition was weaker? You do realize both are possible? Are you really saying that Federer is playing as well now as he did in 2005-2006 and that the only difference is the competition? Anyone who has watched the guy play knows he isn't in top form.

    Except it wasn't nearly as impressive a display as it was in 2007 against Roddick.
     
    #34
  35. devila

    devila Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,749
    He has long takeback swings, so even with down the line backhands, he has to recover fast to his forehand side, and bludgeon harder to Nadal's forehand (or Murray's forehand).
    Federer cannot change to that because he's incapable of moving fast when he faces a variety of sidespin and both really slow/very fast returns to his forehand.

    The reasons Roddick and Nalbandian collapsed against him were:
    They were too heavy and that weakened their arm-stretches.
    They were too tired and sweaty (unfit) to chase down each ball.
    They had no energy left to serve with different toss height.
    They kept hitting to his backhand with 3-foot high slow balls,
    and they became lazy
    with footwork; lost their balanced footwork at the net.

    Djokovic doesn't have enough serve variety, and can't do enough to hurt
    the top players and fast servers who can improve a lot (Roddick and Tsonga).
    Federer can take advantage of him (Djokovic was a little distracted by Roddick and the booing crowd. He didn't put much energy into breaking serve, Federer got free rides to the final, after Andreev also choked away his break chances in the 5th set against Fed in the USO).






    f
     
    #35
  36. edberg505

    edberg505 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    6,073
    What the hell?
     
    #36
  37. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    He has. Nadal is very good looping his backhand to Fed's backhand when in the middle of the court.
     
    #37
  38. SoBad

    SoBad Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,814
    Location:
    shiran
    Well, if he is already directing everything (or so he thinks), then how can you expect him to direct everything AND Nadal's backhand?
     
    #38
  39. edberg505

    edberg505 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    6,073
    I can count on 1 hand the number of times I've seen Nadal go after Federer's backhand with his own backhand. 90 percent of Nadal's backhands go crosscourt. Especially his forceful ones.
     
    #39
  40. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    No one is better at directing a ball then Nadal. Thus he dictates where the matchups are. The players that bother Nadal the most are solid on both sides. Djokovic and Murray come to mind.
     
    #40
  41. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Watch the French Open final. Nadal went for his shots when he went crosscourt and looped them when he went down the line. It depends where Fed hits the ball. If Nadal is hit way out wide, he hits flat and crosscourt. When in a neutral rally he loops it to Fed's backhand. Get it now?
     
    #41
  42. edberg505

    edberg505 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    6,073
    Ah yes, you are right. How could I be so stupid? That is exactly what he does. Please forgive me.
     
    #42
  43. edmondsm

    edmondsm Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,902
    Location:
    In an in between place.
    His knees. Honestly, Nadal was obviously ailing in the AO final. Might have been fatigue, might have been his knees, or a combination of the two. Either way Federer should have been playing bh drop shots like crazy to force Nadal into the net. This would do three things:

    1) Force Nadal to do some running.

    2) Bring Nadal to the net where he is much weaker then at the baseline.

    3) Set the idea in Nadal's head that a bh dropper might be coming anytime, and thus throw off his game.


    I know. Where does this idea of Nadal hitting backhands down the line come from? I have only ever seen him do it when his opponent is at net.
     
    #43
  44. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    It's one of the most difficult shots for righty 1 hander to direct lefty's side spinned forehand shot to the lefty's backhand side.

    Plus, Nadal is natural righty playing lefty. So Federer is not so motivated to do so. Federer vented his frustration by saying "Nadal has two forehands".

    In summary, Nadal's strengths just fit right into Federer's weaker parts.
     
    #44
  45. Mungo73

    Mungo73 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,014
    he needs a coach to tell him that!!!
     
    #45
  46. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    no nadal freak is correct. Nadal hits down the line with his own backhand quite often. Now he rarely ever crunches but it's a very effective, low risk way for him to keep it away from federer's forehand. It's very obvious in their clay court encounters and is also noticeable at wimbledon and recently at the AO. Nadal is actually very selective when he chooses to go cross court with his backhand (for example when federer leaves it hanging, federer is out of position because he has run around his backhand, when he decides to go behind federer as federer is recovering to the center of the court).

    Now in their two early hard court matches nadal actually went quite a bit to federer's forehand in neutral rallies but imo he quickly learned that he would lose a lot of those rallies.
     
    #46
  47. matchmaker

    matchmaker Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    4,040
    Nadal's backhand is just better in dealing with the Federer crosscourt FH than the other way round. Lefties rarely have a weak backhand because they are used to righties pounding it. Nadal's backhand may not be his strength, but it is good enough to deal with anything that is thrown at him.
     
    #47
  48. henryshli

    henryshli Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    733
    Perhaps Federer is a little too proud sometimes to just target Nadal's backhand relentlessly.

    People have always said that if you are good you shouldn't have to adjust your own game to win.
     
    #48
  49. SaintClaires

    SaintClaires Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    631
    Location:
    New York
    Federer sometimes plays stupidly against Nadal
     
    #49
  50. bolo

    bolo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,380
    that's true too, sometimes when nadal is pushed way out he does decide to take a rip at the cc backhand. But this is an all or nothing shot, either a winner or an error usually.
     
    #50

Share This Page