Why I'm Not Watching The Hobbit movie

Discussion in 'Odds & Ends' started by max, Nov 7, 2012.

  1. chrischris

    chrischris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,917
    I feel for this move .. into deep sleep. Woke up fresh as a daisy . Apparently it does some good.
     
    #51
  2. Timbo's hopeless slice

    Timbo's hopeless slice Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,097
    fears may be realised, will let y'all know, but I've heard it's rather tedious.. uh oh

    think I will save my enthusiasm for Les Miserables for which I have high hopes...
     
    #52
  3. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,616
    #53
  4. flyinghippos101

    flyinghippos101 Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    5,332
    For the most part, I thought the adaptations were fairly well done too. Granted, there was a lot of cutting and shifting. Tom bombabil was definitely a reasonable cut. Bombabil is just so bizzarely out of synch with the ongoing plot, it didn't seem necessary to include him IMO. I remembering them mentioning that they had casting for Bombabil though.

    I was a bit apprehensive when a I heard the adaptation was being split in three films too. But from what I've heard so far, I guess they're all about character development in this first film along with expanding on Gandalf's storyline. i'm not too miffed about the run time tbh, I can handle the slow burn and time taken to flesh out the characters, it only makes subsequent films that much more emotionally engaging.
     
    #54
  5. adventure

    adventure Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    509
    It's a very good movie.

    It's a major technological leap forward. The high frame rate is a huge boon for our enjoyment of fast moving action sequences, in particular.

    Also, the majority of CGI in this film is indeed photo-realistic; not all of it, but the majority of it is. Those computer clock cycles and terabytes of information are not going to waste. Gollum's face is incredibly detailed, with the tiniest of crow's feet and eye and face wrinkles.

    PJ is definitely paying attention to the details, here.

    I expect the avatar sequels to be even better.

    If anything, I wish films were filmed at 60 fps, not 48 fps.

    I am very much looking forward to the blu ray release.
     
    #55
  6. Nostradamus

    Nostradamus G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2011
    Messages:
    13,230
    Location:
    In the future
    Is there a lot of monsters ? and sword fighting and Magic ? if so I will go see it.
     
    #56
  7. JoelDali

    JoelDali G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    10,715
    This is Spielberg's best work since Jurassic Pork.
     
    #57
  8. goober

    goober Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,491
    Yes Feddy and I think He-man makes a cameo too.
     
    #58
  9. r2473

    r2473 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    7,113
    Oh, that was character development? Gotcha.

    This is what the movie is all about.

    I'm a fan of the opposite. I prefer low tech films with good plot structure, dialogue, and story-line. I much prefer plays to movies for example. I think all the high tech "stuff" just gets in the way and is pretty annoying to be honest.
     
    #59
  10. r2473

    r2473 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    7,113
    FWIW, I like Wagner's retelling of the "Nibelungen" Norse myth much better than Tolkien's (Hobbit / Lord of the Rings) or Lucas' (Start Wars).

    But I've never liked my good guys to be perfectly good or my bad guys to be perfectly bad. Moral ambiguity makes things more complex and interesting. It's why we like Clint Eastwood's characters for example.
     
    #60
  11. Magic of tennis

    Magic of tennis Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Messages:
    444
    Location:
    USA
    Lucky you are. Hoping all goes well
     
    #61
  12. Cormorant

    Cormorant Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,222
    A 90-minute special edition on DVD might have been the way to go, in order to assuage all the uproar over this overlong first part. But no, it seems the home release will be the customary 180+ minutes that is the hallmark of Jackson's Tolkien adaptations. An interesting side note is that Ian McKellen wrote a scene for the film, only for it to be absent from the theatrical version. What does it say for the thesp's screenwriting skills if his work didn't make it into reportedly one of the most over-indulgent blockbusters of recent years?

    http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=36034
     
    #62
  13. Nostradamus

    Nostradamus G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2011
    Messages:
    13,230
    Location:
    In the future
    I like Dragons. Is there lots of dragons ? then it should be a good movie
     
    #63

Share This Page