why so few competitive matches at the french this year?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Moose Malloy, Jun 6, 2007.

  1. Moose Malloy

    Moose Malloy Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,924
    From the 3rd round on there were only 2 five set matches played, none in the 4th Round or QF.

    There were 8 4th round matches & 4 QF matches played, out of those 12 matches, 8 were straight sets, including 3 of the 4 QF matches. Not very fun to watch imo.

    what happened to all the 5 setters(or even 4 setters) that used to be so common at the French?

    This is the first time in the Open Era that there were no five setters in the 16's or QF of the French. Hope the semis/finals can save the tournament.

    In '03, 3 of the 4 QF went 5 sets.
     
    #1
  2. SER

    SER Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    219
    I noticed this too. That was one of the reasons I loved this tournament so much in the past. It's been a little more dull this year.
     
    #2
  3. dubsplayer

    dubsplayer Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    660
    One big snoozefest the last couple of rounds.
     
    #3
  4. Supernatural_Serve

    Supernatural_Serve Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,348
    Its the modern power game crippling the magic of grass, and now clay too.

    I don't think we can say that the top 20 players or so vary so dramatically in ability, so that's not it. Although we can say that some are more comfortable on clay than others, so that's contributing to the easy wins.
     
    #4
  5. swisser

    swisser Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    126
    its because the moden players are more dominat more straight foward
     
    #5
  6. tennissavy

    tennissavy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,840
    Most of the women's matches have been very competitive. Most of the men's matches have been a complete bore.
     
    #6
  7. jhhachamp

    jhhachamp Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,066
    I have noticed this as well, that nearly every match this year is a blowout. I think it is just coincadence howerer. If they redid the French and did the draw all over again, I bet there would be more tight matches.
     
    #7
  8. pound cat

    pound cat G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    13,769
    The depth in men's tennis seems to be concentrated in a few players all of a sudden and the same names seem to be winning, whereas women's tennis seems to have many players who are really quite good & very compettive all of a sudden. Interesting switch..ATP/WTA.
     
    #8
  9. tricky

    tricky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,305
    Anybody think the weather this year may have affected how the surface plays? Like, a little faster, lower bounce?
     
    #9
  10. morten

    morten Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,354
    Yes, all too one dementional, apart from Nadal no real claycourters left...
     
    #10
  11. zzzbrianxxx

    zzzbrianxxx Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    170
    If they would seed players based on talent and not the exact ATP rankings, we would see much more competitive matches .
     
    #11
  12. Moose Malloy

    Moose Malloy Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,924
    I'm surprised to see Djokovic win his last 2 matches in straights. He's not that much better than they are on clay, think some players need a gutcheck.

    There weren't many 5 setters from the 4th round on last year as well.
     
    #12
  13. peluzon

    peluzon Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    322
    Because everybody even the players are waiting for the final Roger vs Rafa.
     
    #13
  14. J-man

    J-man Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,053
    I have also noticed this. More though in the latter rounds (Canas vs Davydenko, Igor vs Novak).
     
    #14
  15. @wright

    @wright Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,567
    To me it seems like claycourters of the past would fight to the bitter end. The current crop just tries to hit through opponents, and if it doesn't work, they just hit harder. They don't push the ball to keep the match going longer.
     
    #15
  16. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    It's been very predictable FO last few years.
    Top seeds making last 4.

    Why no 5 setters ? I don't know. Maybe just a coincidence.

    I think lack of different match ups could be small part of it.

    If you run out of your options at baseline, you are pretty much out of other alternatives.
    You might as well pack your bag.

    There's much less tactical options you could have to turn the match around.
    It's becoming a performance "contest" rather than playing "game".

    Of course, in all reavtive terms...
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2007
    #16
  17. drakulie

    drakulie Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    24,466
    Location:
    FT. Lauderdale, Florida
    Moose, I have to agree. This has been a boring French. Hopefully, we will get some outstanding clay court tennis in the semis.
     
    #17
  18. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427
    not so bad. davy vs nalby, davy vs canas, joker vs andreev, fed vs robredo etc.

    a few of the top 20 players withdrew: haas, murray, ancic. etc.

    well, a top player playing against another top player doesn't mean close matches. Fed and Nadal are too above the rest. I think the semis are what you hope for, but the scores may be one-sided as well.
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2007
    #18
  19. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    awright, I don't think the pro equivalent of pushing works anymore on clay. Players now can either hit outright winners off short balls or setup easy winners of them.
     
    #19
  20. AAAA

    AAAA Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    3,389
    Not many 5 setters? That does knock on the head the armchair critic idea that clay court tennis is always a grind.
     
    #20
  21. Max G.

    Max G. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    4,382
    I dunno, I'd say just luck. It happens. I wouldn't read a trend into one tournament...
     
    #21
  22. rwn

    rwn Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    417
    Exactly. It's like claiming that Federer is in a big slump after 2 or 3 losses.
     
    #22
  23. NoBadMojo

    NoBadMojo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    11,915
    Location:
    Parts unknown
    I think what happens is that after the firsst set in many of these matches, it becomes obvious which of the opponents is beter prepared to grind it out that day, and the other just kind of packs it in..hence the shorter matches...obviously whoever wins the first set with my theory would be the eventual winner of the match..i wonder how many matches there were where the guy losing the first set, came back to win the match? dont think the girls are so relevent being best 2 of 3
     
    #23
  24. Fedexeon

    Fedexeon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,950
    The only 5 sets match i can recall is Hewitt vs Gaudio. Davydenko vs Nalbandian 4 sets is quite exciting. Well, lets hope for some 5 sets action in semis.
     
    #24
  25. urban

    urban Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,380
    Like the grass courters before, now the clay courters are dying out. We see a standardisation to one game and one style: a powerful baseline style, based on hard courts. The same last four are well possible at all venues (maybe not Davydenko at Wim). Its a bit frightening to see, that top players like Nadal or Federer come throught with such soft competition. And if you think, these two are godlike, look at Djoko: He is a uprising star with just a few good months behind him , but has not much trouble either, and he could well be in the sf or f at Wimbledon and USO. All players are so predictable, hardcourters with a sound, but somewhat harmless game. No big weapons, no mighty serve or a real grinding game, which could upset or even hurt a favorite. Mentally they are all all a bit like Henman in his day. Robredo is the paradigma player for this age: he does all things quite well, but nothing exceptional; as sort of modern Emilio Sanchez, a Brad Gilbert without the brain. Result in the modern game: perennial quarterfinalist, with practically no chance to even hurt the top 2 or 3. I miss the Larssons, Sundströms, Costas, Perssons, Mancinis, Jaites - guys from the second or third tier, who on their day, really challenged the toppers.
     
    #25
  26. goforgold99

    goforgold99 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    718
    At least we had a new record five-set match at RG:

    Kohlschreiber - Dlouhy
    6-2 3-6 7-5 4-6 17-15
    :D :D :D
     
    #26
  27. tennis_hand

    tennis_hand Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,427
    Nalbadian beating Monfils is also a very good match.
     
    #27
  28. rwn

    rwn Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    417
    Maybe this standardization is there because that is simply the most effective way to play tennis. IMO it's the same as with soccer, when it became better it became more boring to watch. For example better defensive skills so less chances for attackers to show what they can do. Of course people who look at the past with rosecolored glasses will never accept this possibility.
     
    #28
  29. pound cat

    pound cat G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    13,769

    And how would they do that? Polls on TW messageboard ? Vote for who you think is the most talented player? safin would be right up there, so would that guarantee a more competative match?
     
    #29
  30. l_gonzalez

    l_gonzalez Professional

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    915
    Location:
    London
    I think GS in general haven't been quite as exciting since they changed the seedings rules from 16 seeds to 32 seeds. This may be what allows the better players to find their groove at a GS, play their way into the tournament and reach the latter stages.

    If we only had 16 seeds we could have had Safin vs Federer in the second round, or Nadal vs Canas, Ferrero vs Djokovic.

    It would mean that the top seeds wouldn't be able to cruise through their first few matches and find their from, we might get to see them struggle against good players in the early matches.

    Or maybe the top players are just too good at the moment.

    Agassi dropped 8 sets on his way to the title in 1999
    Guga dropped 6 in 2000 and 5 in 2001
     
    #30
  31. urban

    urban Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,380
    But look, whom Guga had to beat in 1997. It included Muster, Medwedew, Kafelnikov, Bruguera - a real murderer row.
     
    #31
  32. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,498
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    I think I know what this thread is attempting to imply, but this comment by Steve Dykstra, although not controversial or particularly exciting, is the real reason.
     
    #32
  33. federerfanatic

    federerfanatic Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    3,046
    Djokovic is just mentally on another planet then his last couple opponents. That IMO came into play much more then he really isnt much better on clay.
     
    #33
  34. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,167
    I would have loved to see Kuerten in his prime against Fed now.Fed is getting the results on clay now, the biggest one of course is winning it.
     
    #34
  35. federerfanatic

    federerfanatic Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    3,046

    I am sorry to say I dont think Fed do well vs Kuerten in his prime on clay. Remember he was comfortably beaten by an injured detiorated kuerten in the 2004 French Open. Then again that is only 1 match and people read too much into only 1 match. Their other match on clay was in 2002. That was the year Kuerten first began to diminish with injuries but he was still probably closer to his prime then Federer at that point, and was definitely higher ranked, and Federer beat him in 3 sets in the best 2-out-3 with a pretty crushing 3rd set.

    I think he would have the odd win vs Kuerten, maybe moreso then Nadal, but he also would have gotten beaten more easily by Kuerten on certain days then he is by Nadal(Nadal's only straight sets win over Federer was only during Federer's big slump earlier this year). Kuerten did not perfect day in and day out at almost the same level like Nadal, but could reach a higher peak on clay on his best days too.
     
    #35
  36. ACE of Hearts

    ACE of Hearts G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,167
    When he was beaten by Kuerten, Roger didnt move as well on the clay.He is consistent now on it.I think he would give Kuerten a good run.Lets not forget that heavy topspin doesnt play a factor here and he is not a lefty.
     
    #36
  37. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    When was this 32 seeding started ?
     
    #37
  38. Moose Malloy

    Moose Malloy Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,924
    Started with 2001 Wimbledon. Ironically a wildcard ranked 125 won it that year.

    Well, there was only one 5 setter from the 4th round on at last years French as well. But there were many 5 setters in '05 so it may be luck.

    But I do agree with urban, there are no real claycourt specialists these days. Federer & Nadal are playing guys like Cipolla, Ascione, Montanes, in the early rounds. Not too long ago these guys were unseeded floaters:Norman, Arazi, Larsson, El Aynaoui, Medvedev, Blanco, DeWulf, Portas, Meligeni, Clavet, Gumy, Mantilla, Squillari.

    Kuerten played so many 4/5 setters when he was winning the French, while Federer & Nadal have played hardly any(and no 5 setters) the last 2 years, which I find a little odd, don't think they are that much better than him, some of that has to do with level of competition.

    I've never seen a FO where the 2 finalists so easily advanced to the final, like last year & this year.
     
    #38
  39. Rhino

    Rhino Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    7,498
    Location:
    South of London, west of Moscow
    That isn't really telling the whole story though is it? He was a former 3 time finalist.
    You said it. Never before has the tennis world seen such an enormous all round talent like Federer, and a clay court talent like Nadal. these guys are next-level. They are taking it to new heights that previous finalists could only dream of.
     
    #39
  40. RMB

    RMB Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Messages:
    275
    Well, take a look at the w. semis and tell me that they were competitive.
     
    #40
  41. tintin

    tintin Professional

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,438
    Location:
    none of your damn business
    the women's semis at Wimbledon last year had a lot more action than today's 2 matches:mad:
     
    #41
  42. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    I think it's also more physically demanding year around compared to past.

    You have to play longer rallies (at baseline) in genrally slowed down condition and
    you have to play more tournaments (best of 18 ranking system)
     
    #42
  43. fastdunn

    fastdunn Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,294
    There is no question about the talents of Federer and Nadal.
    But there were pretty considerable changes between 2001-2003
    in the professional tennis tour. I think it helped them a bit to dominate
    more.
     
    #43
  44. Einstand

    Einstand New User

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    10
    I am actually surprised that Federer was given a 6-1 set by Robredo and Nadal has dropped as many games as he did so far. I was expecting Nadal to come up with a Borg like performance where he dropped only 35 games or some such in 7 matches.

    Borg reached FO final several times without dropping a set and many fewer games than Nadal and Federer.

    Someone mentioned Kuerten dropped several sets .. that's no surprise considering that he had like only a 70% win rate on clay. He was even down a match point v Russel in one of the years he won .. can't imagine Russel-like player taking even a single set from Federer and especially not against Nadal.
     
    #44

Share This Page