Will Federer Ever win the French Open?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by The balls in your court., Jun 8, 2008.

?

Will Federer Ever win the French Open?

  1. NO Federer will never win the French Open

    164 vote(s)
    59.9%
  2. yes Federer will win the FO

    71 vote(s)
    25.9%
  3. Undecided

    39 vote(s)
    14.2%
  1. The balls in your court.

    The balls in your court. Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    798
    Will Federer Ever win the French Open?
     
    #1
  2. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    What do YOU think? If yes, you are one stubborn fella.
     
    #2
  3. The balls in your court.

    The balls in your court. Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    798
    No way in hell. I think its obvious now.
     
    #3
  4. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,784
    Location:
    Weak era
    I'm his big fan but I think not.He had his best chance in 2006,didn't use it then and now I think his chances of triumphing at the French are gone.I think he'll win more slams but it will be Wimbledon,USO and maybe AO,not the French Open.
     
    #4
  5. crawl4

    crawl4 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    334
    i say undecided..you cant rule out the possible goat
     
    #5
  6. KRFLegal

    KRFLegal Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    111
    No -- Federer has peaked, Nadal and Djokovic are still to peak...and there may be some other threats around the corner...three strikes at the Final, and Federer has struck out...time for a new batter...

    Probably shouldn't have had 'Undecided' in the poll...that's no fun for this type of question...
     
    #6
  7. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    After today this question should be officialy put to bed forever. Even if Nadal suffered some horrible career ending injury (and no that wont happen, there is only a 0.1% chance of that happening or something) then there would be Djokovic there to spank him on clay in the future. In future years there will be a few more, even though they arent there now.
     
    #7
  8. AM28143

    AM28143 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Messages:
    512
    Probably not. Definitely not if Nadal doesn't get injured or something. Federer is good on clay (better than his performance today would indicate), but Nadal is just that much better. If Nadal remains healthy, he'll win at least 3 more FOs.

    -Adam :)
     
    #8
  9. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    fededer's obstacle to winning the french open these past three years has been nadal. so, if nadal fails to compete in future french open due to some reason, federer will have a good chance of taking home the french open trophy.
     
    #9
  10. bagung

    bagung Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,397
    with the way nadal is playing, i doubt federer has a chance.....
    VAMOS RAFA
     
    #10
  11. Nadal_Freak

    Nadal_Freak Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,625
    Location:
    Harker Heights, Texas
    Nope. Clay is a surface for young players. 20-25 is usually the best age for Clay.
     
    #11
  12. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Please. Djokovic would have spanked Federer at the French Open the way both were playing. Federer is not the 2nd best clay courter at the moment, unless he re-raises his game drastically, and he only was in the final due to his joke draw of this years French. As todays final proved, he did not really even belong in that match.
     
    #12
  13. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    i don't know what would be the outcome of a federer-djokovic match. not sure who would come out on top but i don't think it would result in a blowout.

    in my view, federer likes the flat balls of djokovic much better then the high topspin balls of nadal. futhermore, nadal's a lefty and that bothers federer even more.
     
    #13
  14. Legend of Borg

    Legend of Borg Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    8,054
    Location:
    Pazardjik, Bulgaria
    Maybe it's his intimidating physique?
     
    #14
  15. Mick

    Mick Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    8,363
    haha. nadal is definitely a lot more muscular than djokovic :)
     
    #15
  16. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Fair enough but in the past Federer was strong enough to take Nadal to 4 sets regularly in best 3-of-5s on clay, even with Nadal's superiority on clay and any potential matchup issues. I dont think any matchup problems explain away how much more competitive Djokovic was vs Nadal then Federer. Djokovic at this French Open was just alot stronger then Federer. Maybe if they played it wouldnt have been a blowout, but Federer wouldnt have won a single set. I would bet money on that if a time machine could make it happen somehow.
     
    #16
  17. Legend of Borg

    Legend of Borg Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    8,054
    Location:
    Pazardjik, Bulgaria
    If Nadal had Ivanisevic's temper, he would be one frightening competitor.
     
    #17
  18. Milano

    Milano Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    268
    I think this year was Federers best chance to win it, now I think everything is going to go downhill for him (I still think he will take 2 more gs) but he may even lose wimbledon to nadal :shock: especially if you saw the replay of last years wimby today, nadal was shockingly close, a couple of points here and there and it would have gone the other way.
     
    #18
  19. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    I agree, back in 2006 I said that Fed would have 2 more chances to realistically win this thing. I think of his 4 matches with Nadal here this was so lopsided and non competitive that I can't imagine Fed doing anything to change the result in future encounters.

    Let's just think for a second here. If Fed continues his "subpar" year into Wimby and US Open and doesn't win a GS he will not finish #1 this year. He has an awful lot of points to defend from here on in. Wimby, Montreal final, Cincy, US Open, Madrid final, Shanghai. There's alot of points he could lose from here on to the end. Nadal doesn't have many points to defend after this Wimby. So if he continues his excellent playing for 2008 so far he has a real shot at #1, or at least continue as #2.
     
    #19
  20. whereisz

    whereisz Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    133
    He will when Nadal is injured or retired.
     
    #20
  21. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Nadal's biggest obstacle to the year end #1 is Djokovic. Djokovic is now the best hard court player in the world and most of the events remaining this year are hard courts. He is less then 100 points behind Nadal after the clay court season. To be honest Djokovic is a huge concern for Nadal for the year end #1, but it could go either way between them.
     
    #21
  22. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    Fed will retire first. If he's injured who's to say Fed is a lock? Joker is a serious threat now and others will become threats in the future. Fed is declining as he gets older, this much we know. If Nadal gets injured I can bet it won't happen during the FO. Maybe the US Open or Aussie, but not during his beloved Roland Garros. He'll play with one leg if he has to. I'd still like his chances even then.
     
    #22
  23. Mansewerz

    Mansewerz Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,164
    Location:
    Caught in No Man's Land
    You never know. A lot of the other winners were very unexpected when they did win. However, it is hard to think about it now.
     
    #23
  24. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    With Nadal around you won't be seeing unexpected winners at the FO, maybe some unexpected finalists. Not for a few years.
     
    #24
  25. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Djokovic has surpassed Federer on clay ability wise this year IMO. Just look at the semi and final matches of Nadal at this years French. So Federer is not even the 2nd best on clay anymore IMO. Yeah he beat Djokovic at Monte Carlo, but since then Djokovic has impressed more each time out on clay then Federer has. In future years a few others could also surpass him on clay, particularly if he continues to decline, especialy on that surface which does not favor age. So you are right if Nadal is injured Federer would no longer be the one to win the French, even in that case.

    Even if the haters who have been wrong on almost everything so far are miraceously right and Nadal suffers early burnout/retirement, etc.... it is still hard to believe Federer would be a huge force on clay by that point anyway. In the most extreme case scenario that would be 3 years from now, and Federer will be going on 30 then. Even if he is still at the top, he wont be on clay at that point.
     
    #25
  26. NikeWilson

    NikeWilson Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    683
    today's match should put an end to this question.

    also, Djokovic played better against Nadal than Federer did. therefore, Djokovic would've had the upper-hand against Federer too.
     
    #26
  27. FuriousYellow

    FuriousYellow Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,485
    After watching today's beatdown, I'm starting to think his first or second times playing Nadal were his best chances. Not only has he not figured out how to beat Nadal on clay, Nadal appears to have him completely figured out.
     
    #27
  28. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    That's such a good observation of you, because it looked like Nadal knew where Fed's shots were going to land even before he hit it. He looked like he knew one or two shots ahead of Fed. Fed hasn't and won't figure out Nadal on clay, ever. Watch out for Wimby too. Nadal might be figuring it out too. We'll see.
     
    #28
  29. edberg505

    edberg505 Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    6,074
    There I fixed that for you.
     
    #29
  30. BlahDow

    BlahDow Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    233
    Yes....If Nadal is injured and doesn't play in the tournament.
     
    #30
  31. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    You're on a roll.
     
    #31
  32. Morrissey

    Morrissey Guest

    It was music to my ears to hear 5,000 French people be silenced today.
     
    #32
  33. Alejandro D

    Alejandro D Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    747
    I think he'll never beat Rafa at RG. He might win the french if Nadal gets injured. Otherwise, no way.
     
    #33
  34. gj011

    gj011 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,548
    Location:
    Back from prison
    No. The window is closed now.
     
    #34
  35. TheTruth

    TheTruth G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,671
    I agree. Djokovic was way more convincing than Fed. Fed looked like he didn't want to be there from the first ball!
     
    #35
  36. robin7

    robin7 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,155
    No Way..... Sorry...
     
    #36
  37. lovecr717

    lovecr717 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2007
    Messages:
    321
    10 character
     
    #37
  38. Rob_C

    Rob_C Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,693
    Didn't Fed just beat Djokovic at Monte Carlo this year?? Did Djokovic improve that much in the few weeks, and Fed regress that much???

    I don't think you can put too much stock in one result, I think it's an aberration.

    Until that last set, Djokovic was looking pretty helpless against Nadal also. He was down 2 breaks in the last set, managed to tie it up.
     
    #38
  39. TheTruth

    TheTruth G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,671
    They were quiet because they were in shock, but the music to my ears was when Ted Robinson said late in the match, how the people were chanting Rafa's name during the changeover! JMac and Carillo didn't even respond.
     
    #39
  40. DarthMaul

    DarthMaul Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,306
    Location:
    Asuras
    Was Agassi young when he won the FO? He was 29 years old, if I am not wrong!
     
    #40
  41. Thor

    Thor Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    972
    Location:
    Valhala
    99 points ont the ATP RACE(which is 495 points in ranking points earned since the begining of the year).
    Nadal still leads by 360 points.
     
    #41
  42. crawl4

    crawl4 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    334
    sorry but im pretty sure federer beat him during the season and he made the final..
     
    #42
  43. daddy

    daddy Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,686
    Location:
    Moon Balls
    Speaking about Djokovic ? I think Fed would switch place with Djokovic right now and take the performance in semis vs Nadal over his performance in finals any day in the week.
     
    #43
  44. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,784
    Location:
    Weak era
    No question about that,in fact he would probably take Belucci's perfromance as well(although that was Nadal's first match this year at FO so I guess he wasn't fully in his clay machine mode yet).
     
    #44
  45. daddy

    daddy Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,686
    Location:
    Moon Balls
    Kid is underrated. He had a set point, he was playing excelent tennis and in the third set he fell apart which is expected ( Djokovic and Federer fell apart in the 2nd ). The fact that he went out in the very first round is killing the chance of people talking about him but if he was in any other part of the draw he'd go deeper.
     
    #45
  46. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,784
    Location:
    Weak era
    Yeah,Belucci has game I expect to see a lot more from him in the future along with Gulbis.
     
    #46
  47. PimpMyGame

    PimpMyGame Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,432
    I say undecided because given the right factors he can still do it.

    Next year the pressure will be on Nadal to win 5 in a row. By the next FO it's a reasonable assumption to say Federer might just be on 13 GSs. I think Fed will adjust his training to accommodate more and more clay court practice and strategy, if he really wants this title.

    In any case, I don't think Fed has to prove to anyone (apart from himself maybe) that he's the best tennis player of this generation, and one of the best (if not the best) of all time.
     
    #47
  48. daddy

    daddy Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,686
    Location:
    Moon Balls
    I do agree with the very first sentence, I think he's more than capable of winning the RG in couple of years to come. I dont agree with the sentence is bold as I strongly believe Fed will not be able to win if Rafa is in hos path - therefor the right factor for me is singular and it's the absence of Rafael.
     
    #48
  49. zagor

    zagor Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,784
    Location:
    Weak era
    Look,Nadal handles pressure of being the favourite probably better then any player I've ever seen and has reached another level on clay this year while Fed will be 28 next year.Fed's my favourite player of all time but let's be realistic here,I think Roger will equal or break Pete's record but his chances of winning FO are over IMO.
     
    #49
  50. drive

    drive Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2007
    Messages:
    720
    Location:
    Valencia
    it seems people forget that Djokovic got steamrolled by Nadal as well and only came back in the third set because of Rafa was so relaxed, it's obvious. No chance in hell for Djokovic to beat Nadal on clay, at the moment he is million miles away.
     
    #50

Share This Page